Skip to main content

The Israeli Connection: A Reckoning With a Global Arms Empire

 



In a world shaped by military might and geopolitical maneuvering, few works have penetrated the architecture of modern militarism as courageously as Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi’s The Israeli Connection: Who Israel Arms and Why. Written in 1987, this book is not merely an academic study — it is a moral confrontation with how a state once preoccupied with survival became deeply implicated in global networks of repression and control.

Beit-Hallahmi forces us to ask uncomfortable questions: What happens when the tools of survival at home become the instruments of domination abroad? What worldview is embedded in the arms sold to distant regimes, and at what cost to human dignity?


“Exporting the Experience of Zionism”

Beit-Hallahmi cuts to the core of his argument with a striking assertion:

What Israel is doing in the Third World is simply to export the Middle East experience of Zionism — not just a technology of domination, but a worldview that undergirds that technology.”

This quote is more than theory; it reveals how military ideology becomes a lens for understanding foreign relations — one rooted not only in commerce but in a logic of control. Israel didn’t only sell weapons; it sold the logic of dominance, implicitly teaching how populations can be controlled, insurgencies crushed, and order imposed.


From Small Nation to Arms Powerhouse

Beit-Hallahmi’s analysis highlights an almost paradoxical development: a small country with minimal natural resources rose to become a major arms exporter within a few decades. He observes that:

“… it is almost unimaginable that one of the smallest states on earth … could become a leading armaments exporter within a few decades.”

This was no random outcome. The militarization of Israeli society was shaped by the realities of settler-colonial conflict and the belief that military strength was central to national survival — a belief that later turned outward into global arms markets.


Arms and Alliances: A Moral Crossroads

Beit-Hallahmi doesn’t shy away from naming clients that defy comforting narratives. In his book, he identifies military ties with authoritarian forces, from Latin American juntas to African strongmen, as part of this exported experience — a connection between domestic militarism and foreign repression.

For example, he details how Israel sold arms to Chile’s Pinochet regime, revealing diplomatic and military backing that sustained a government known for brutal suppression.

These connections were not peripheral but central to Israel’s foreign military trade, raising enduring ethical questions about whose freedom is served by these deals.


Parallels at Home and Abroad

One of the book’s most chilling insights is the parallel drawn between internal occupation and external support for repression. Beit-Hallahmi suggests that the same logic used to dominate and control populations within historic Palestine found its way into how Israel approached its military partners abroad — a perspective that implicates ideology, not just economics, in the spread of militarism.

The export of weapons was therefore not simply commerce; it was the projection of a security paradigm that saw force as the definitive solution to resistance.


Why This Matters Today

Beit-Hallahmi’s work is decades old — yet it feels eerily relevant to our present. Around the world, militarized responses to insurgencies and social unrest have become normalized. The global arms trade continues to fuel conflicts, and the normalization of military solutions remains deeply entrenched in international politics.

Beit-Hallahmi’s radical insight — that arms are not merely tools but carriers of ideology — challenges readers to think more deeply about how violence is exported and normalized.


Questions for Reflection

  • What is the moral responsibility of arms-producing nations toward the societies that receive those weapons?
  • How do ideologies travel with technology in global militarism?
  • Can a state that has itself experienced occupation participate ethically in an international arms market?

These questions are not relics of the Cold War — they are pressing ethical dilemmas of our time.


Authenticated Reliable Sources

  1. Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi’s The Israeli Connection: Who Israel Arms and Why (Pantheon Books, 1987).
  2. Review and synopsis in Books on Palestine (1950–2025) — detailing the arms trade and global impact.
  3. Excerpts describing Israel’s export of military domination and worldview.
  4. Documentation of Israel’s military arms advancement and societal shift toward militarization.
  5. Historical reference to Israel’s arms ties with regimes like Pinochet’s Chile from archived analysis.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...