If you ever wanted to witness how confusion, opportunism, theology, nationalism, and bigotry collide in real time — you didn’t need a medieval church council. You only needed to tune into a meeting of the . There, amid political loyalists and pop-culture appointees, a spectacle unfolded: Zionism was denounced, antisemitic conspiracies were flirted with, and centuries-old theological errors were recycled as if they were fresh revelations. But the deeper issue is not one controversial appointee. The deeper issue is this: What precisely is Zionism? And how does it intersect — or collide — with antisemitism? Because in today’s discourse, the two are either falsely merged or lazily separated without thought. Let us disentangle them carefully. 1. What Is Zionism — Precisely? Zionism , in its original and political form, is a 19th-century nationalist movement. It emerged in Europe not from theology, but from crisis. The father of modern political Zionism, , was not respon...
By Malik Mukhtar February 2026 It took only eight hours of indirect talks in Muscat to trigger alarm bells in Jerusalem. Within days, Israeli Prime Minister announced an emergency trip to Washington to meet U.S. President . Eight hours of diplomacy. An emergency flight across an ocean. This is not about scheduling. It is about fear — fear of exclusion, fear of miscalculation, fear that history might be moving without Israel at the table. The Trauma That Still Echoes Officially, Netanyahu insists that any negotiations with Iran must include limits on ballistic missiles and the dismantling of Tehran’s regional proxy network. That demand is not abstract. Missiles from Iran and its allies have left scars — visible and psychological. Northern Israeli towns remain partially displaced. The memory of rocket sirens is not theoretical; it is nightly lived experience. The strikes last summer during the so-called “12-Day War” were not distant battlefield statistics. They were direct h...