Skip to main content

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

 



There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect:
the dignity of the dead.

In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked.

Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.”
But graves?

What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones, tanks, and nuclear ambiguity?

Apparently, enough to be bulldozed.


Graves as Enemy Infrastructure

According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera, Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries. Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated. Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost. Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies.

This was not collateral damage.
This was not crossfire.
This was methodical excavation.

Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one Israeli soldier — a mission treated as sacred, urgent, inviolable. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Palestinian bodies remain under rubble, unnamed, unrecovered, unmourned.

Equality, Israeli-style:
One body deserves an army.
Thousands deserve oblivion.




Necroviolence: When Even Memory Is Targeted

Human rights organizations like Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor documented damage or destruction to over a third of Gaza’s cemeteries. Entire burial grounds were gouged open. Graves dating back decades were erased in minutes.

This is not just violence.
It is necroviolence — the systematic violation of the dead to terrorize the living.

Because cemeteries are not just where bodies lie.
They are where history rests.
Where lineage is anchored.
Where grief becomes memory instead of madness.

Destroy the graves, and you don’t just deny dignity — you erase continuity.


International Law: Clear, Ignored, Mocked

International humanitarian law is unambiguous:

  • The Geneva Conventions demand respect for the dead and their graves.
  • Customary international law prohibits desecration of burial sites.
  • The Rome Statute of the ICC recognizes outrages upon personal dignity — including the dead — as war crimes.

There is no footnote that says:

Except when the victims are Palestinian.”

And yet, enforcement magically evaporates when violations are committed by a U.S.-armed ally.

International law, it seems, is less a shield than a selective vocabularyinvoked against the weak, suspended for the powerful.




The West Bank: Desecration Without War

This is not limited to Gaza.

In the West Bank and East Jerusalem, cemeteries like Bab al-Rahma have been repeatedly damaged, restricted, or vandalized — sometimes by state forces, sometimes by settlers, often with total impunity.

Graves fenced. Funerals restricted. Mourners assaulted.

Because domination does not end with land.
It extends to death rituals themselves.


Mass Graves, Missing Names, Stolen Closure

As Gaza’s healthcare and civil infrastructure collapsed, mass graves became unavoidable. Bodies were buried hastily — not because Palestinians do not honor their dead, but because Israel ensured they had no choice.

Even worse, bodies returned from Israeli custody were often unidentifiable, decomposed, stripped of contextdenying families the most basic human right: knowing who they buried.

This is not a byproduct of war.
This is the architecture of dehumanization.




The Moral Gymnastics of the “Civilized World”

Western leaders express “concern.”
Media outlets say “allegations.”
Institutions call for “investigation.”

But graves stay destroyed.
Bodies stay missing.
Families stay shattered.

Apparently, dignity is conditional.
Humanity is tiered.
And death itself must pass a geopolitical filter.

If this were happening anywhere else — Ukraine, Europe, anywhere with the “right” skin tone — it would be called what it is: barbarism.

But here, it is sanitized. Rationalized. Normalized.



What Does It Say About a System That Fears the Dead?

When a state desecrates graves, it reveals something profound:

  • It fears memory.
  • It fears testimony.
  • It fears history that refuses to stay buried.

Because the dead cannot be interrogated.
They cannot be coerced.
They cannot be silenced.

And so their graves are crushed instead.


History Is Watching. And It Keeps Receipts.

Empires fall not only for what they do to the living
but for what they dare to do to the dead.

Bulldozers can erase graves.
They cannot erase judgment.

And long after the press releases fade, long after the talking points rot, one truth will remain:

A society that denies dignity in death has already forfeited its claim to moral life.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

  By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...