Skip to main content

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace



There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced.

Reality is bad for business.

Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings.

No applause.

A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime:

“Don’t spoil the show. The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate. It’s all about business. No room for realism.”

That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century.



Phase II: Now With Billionaires

Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™, the investment opportunity.

Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction, announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the seriousness of a crypto launch. Jared Kushner urges the doubters to step aside. Give the plan a chance. Stop being negative. Stop noticing corpses.

After all, what’s a little mass death when beachfront property is on the line?

Alpher, to his credit, refuses to clap. He points out what everyone else pretends not to see: this is not Israel’s show anymore. It’s Washington’s. Israel is being managed. Palestinians are being administered. Gaza is being rebranded.

The Rafah Crossing will open—Israeli objections be damned. Turkey and Qatar will be integrated—Netanyahu’s tantrums notwithstanding. Hamas, inconveniently alive, will not be wished away by PowerPoint slides.

Reality, again, intrudes.

Hamas Is Still There (Awkward)

Israel promised “total victory.” It got total exhaustion.

After two years of pulverization, Hamas is not only alive—it is structurally unavoidable. Its bureaucracy, its local power, its social embeddedness all remain. Even Alpher, a former Mossad official, states the obvious without drama: Hamas will be integrated into whatever Gaza becomes.

This is treated as scandalous only because the lie has been repeated for so long.

Disarmament? Sure. On paper. By a “Gaza Stabilization Force” that does not exist, staffed by countries that have not volunteered, on a timetable that no one can name.

But don’t worry—there are committees. Executive boards. Acronyms. All the institutional décor of seriousness.

Economic Peace, Reheated

If this sounds familiar, it should.

We’ve seen this movie before: economic peace. التنمية بدل الحرية. Money instead of justice. High-rises instead of rights. Development as anesthesia.

Alpher lists the graveyard of Israeli fantasies with clinical precision:

  • Economic peace
  • Clan rule
  • Evangelical aid NGOs
  • Gazan resettlement schemes
  • Indonesian and Somaliland mirages
  • “Total victory”

All collapsed. Quickly. Quietly. Conveniently forgotten.

Now we’re asked to believe in Gaza 2035: per capita income of $12,000, Mediterranean beaches, and a docile population that forgot why its homes were flattened.

History, apparently, will be outsourced.

Security Without Strategy

Here’s where Alpher’s critique turns lethal.

What happens when the IDF withdraws, Hamas isn’t disarmed, Turkish forces arrive, and American developers break ground? What happens when Gaza becomes a hybrid of occupation, proxy politics, and venture capitalism?

Who draws the red lines?

Who enforces them?

Who listens to Israel when Washington has already said, “This is our show.”

Israel, Alpher notes with barely concealed contempt, has never had a viable Gaza strategy—only tactics, slogans, and denial. Netanyahu, having dismantled every alternative, now watches as a foreign power imposes a plan that negates even Israel’s own failed ideas.

This is not sovereignty. It is managed decline.



Peace as a Global Power Play

Zoom out, and the Gaza plan looks less like peace and more like Trump’s geopolitical theme park—alongside Greenland, Venezuela, and other assets awaiting “creative” resolution.

The same administration that flirts with war on Iran wants to rebuild Gaza. Alpher points out the contradiction politely. Reality is less polite: you can’t bomb the region and sell condos at the same time.

Houthis don’t respect master plans.

Hezbollah doesn’t care about investor confidence.

Bottom Line (Spoiler: It’s Grim)

Alpher ends where he began—with realism, the forbidden language of Davos.

When this scheme collapses—as so many Gaza schemes have—it will not be billionaires who pay the price. It will be Palestinians buried under rubble and Israelis dragged into the next round of bloodshed.

But until then, the show must go on.

Smile for the cameras. Trust the process. Don’t spoil the mood.

After all, optimism nourishes the investment climate.

And realism?

Realism is bad for business.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...
Post a Comment
Read more

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...
Post a Comment
Read more