By Malik Mukhtar | ainnbeen.blogspot.com They called it the most sophisticated surveillance system ever built. A web of eyes that never blinked, sensors that never slept, and drones that never missed. Israel’s generals sold it as omnipotence wrapped in fiber optics — a “God’s view” over Gaza. They said: “ Nothing moves in Gaza without us knowing.” And then, everything moved . When the smoke of war thinned and Gaza’s ruins began to whisper, something strange happened. Under the pulverized concrete, beneath what Israel thought was just rubble, lay its pride — a labyrinth of spying devices, listening nodes, and micro-drones — all crushed by the very destruction they engineered. The so-called invincible surveillance grid — the “ eyes of Zion ,” as some in Tel Aviv bragged — turned out to be blind, battered, and, worst of all, captured . The irony writes itself: The rubble Israel left behind now shelters its own secrets. According to reports emerging from Gaza’s securi...
On 5 February 2024, a British Employment Tribunal delivered what may become a landmark ruling. In Dr David Miller v University of Bristol , the Tribunal held that Miller’s anti-Zionist beliefs are a protected philosophical belief under section 10 of the Equality Act 2010, and that his dismissal from Bristol was an act of direct discrimination and unfair dismissal . But beyond these legal labels lies something deeper: a moment when critique, in the face of taboos, was affirmed as a space of conscience. The following is not a sterile recounting, but a weaving of law and moral argument—an invitation to read the judgment’s own words, and to feel what they might spell out for resistance, academic freedom, and dissent. “The claimant’s anti-Zionist beliefs qualified as a philosophical belief …” Right at the outset, the Tribunal states: “The claimant’s anti-Zionist beliefs qualified as a philosophical belief and as a protected characteristic pursuant to section 10 Equality Act 2...