🧭 Core Argument Scheindlin’s central point is simple but powerful: 👉 Public support for the Iran war in Israel is already declining—much faster than expected. And more importantly: 👉 This war is not giving the political boost that wars usually give leaders. 📉 1. Rapid Decline in Public Support In most wars, there’s an initial “ rally around the flag” effect . But in this case, support started dropping within weeks , not months. Why? Israelis are seeing: No clear victory path High risks of escalation Uncertain objectives 👉 This creates early fatigue , not long-term unity. ⚠️ 2. Lack of Clear Strategic Goal Scheindlin highlights a key issue: 👉 People don’t understand what “ winning ” looks like. Is the goal: Destroy Iran’s nuclear program? Deter Iran regionally? Regime change? Without clarity: Public confidence erodes Skepticism replaces patriotism 🔥 3. Fear of Regional Escalation The war is not seen as contained. Israelis fear: Hezbo...
By Malik Mukhtar (for ainnbeen.blogspot.com) There are ceasefires that end wars. And then there are ceasefires that simply… rearrange them. What we are witnessing in the aftermath of the U.S.–Iran de-escalation effort is not peace. It is something far more sophisticated—and far more dangerous. It is the art of agreeing to stop a war… while continuing it elsewhere. And no one embodies this doctrine better than . The Moment Peace Almost Happened According to , something rare was unfolding behind the scenes. Washington and Tehran were closer than they had been in years Backchannel diplomacy—facilitated by Pakistan—was active Proposals were exchanged A ceasefire framework was emerging This wasn’t wishful thinking. It was a fragile but real diplomatic opening. Then came the rupture. 👉 An Israeli strike on Iran. Dar’s conclusion was blunt: The attack “triggered dangerous developments” and “severely damaged the peace process.” This is not rhetoric from a dista...