Skip to main content

The Razor-Wired Kindness of Humanitarian Occupation: Testimonies from a Disillusioned Green Beret

 


✍️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com


Meet Anthony Aguilar. Not a protestor. Not a UN diplomat. Not a journalist sipping lattes in Tel Aviv.

    Rtd. US Army Green Beret, Anthony       Aguilar.

He’s a retired U.S. Army Green Beret—a man who has seen war up close, who trained to neutralize threats, not to mourn the killing of barefoot children. In 2025, he signed up with UG Solutions, a U.S. contractor hired to provide “security” for the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Aguilar didn’t arrive in Gaza as a whistleblower. But Gaza changed him. Or more accurately, the West’s industrialized cruelty in Gaza did.

And when he finally spoke out, the world responded with predictable grace:
They fired him.
They called him a liar.
And then they buried his testimony beneath hashtags of “Never Again.”


The Boy Who Walked 12 km for Lentils

Anthony’s breaking point wasn’t the sound of mortar rounds raining on desperate civilians. Nor was it the M855 green-tip armor-piercing rounds issued to contractors—yes, you read that right: armor-piercing bullets at a food distribution site.

No. It was Amir—a 5-year-old Palestinian child, barefoot, dust-covered, who walked 12 kilometers just to get a small bag of rice and lentils.
He kissed Anthony’s hand.
Then moments later, Israeli forces fired tear gas, rubber bullets, and even live rounds into the desperate crowd.
Amir never made it home.

And let us pause to appreciate the irony: In the eyes of the Israeli military and its security contractors, a barefoot starving childwas the threat.


Aid Sites, or Death Traps in Disguise?

Anthony described the GHF sites not as sanctuaries, but as "designed death traps"built deliberately in combat zones, surrounded by razor wire, not barbed wire. Let’s be clear: razor wire is designed to maim, not manage crowds.

Wherever he looked, he saw violations of humanitarian law dressed in the language of “Western support.”
Israel wasn’t just in control—they were commanding the show.

Our client is the IDF,” he was told.
And when he objected to orders from Israeli liaisons to fire on civilians, including children, his morality was seen as a liability.


A Green Beret Calls It: War Crimes.

Let’s not mince wordsAguilar did not hesitate.

Without question, I witnessed war crimes.


 


This wasn’t a rogue unit. This was a systemic weaponization of hunger, where aid became bait, where food lines became killing fields, and where humanitarian work was repurposed as occupation with a PR makeover.

And while the world watched… they applauded.
The U.S. funded it.
The EU justified it.
And the Arab League?—held another conference.


When Heroes Tell the Truth, They Get Erased

After witnessing these atrocities, Aguilar went public.
GHF called him a disgruntled ex-employee.
They said he was "terminated for misconduct."
Because nothing says misconduct like trying to stop a sniper from targeting a hungry crowd.

He presented video evidence, metadata-verified and corroborated by multiple sources. But truth, it seems, is less compelling than a tidy press release from a think tank in Washington.


History Will Ask: Who Shot Amir?

Will it matter that Anthony Aguilar told the truth?
Will it matter that a boy walked for hours in hunger only to be killed for approaching food?

The shame is not that these things happened.
The shame is that we edited them out of the news.

Because in the Gaza of 2025, the world’s humanitarian conscience was fenced off behind razor wire—not to protect the starving, but to protect the lie.


🕊️ "Neutrality in the face of genocide is complicity. But when neutrality becomes policy—backed by drones, sniper rifles, and 30-second condemnations—it becomes a crime."

📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com
📢 Share. Mourn. Rage. But above all—don’t forget Amir.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...