Skip to main content

When Hunger Becomes a Weapon: Gaza’s Starvation Is Not a Tragedy—It’s a Crime


       


✍️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com


There is a cruelty so sharp, so systematic, that even language itself recoils. What’s happening in Gaza is not a “crisis.” It is not “collateral damage.” It is not even merely a “failure of policy.”
It is deliberate.
It is calculated.
And it is criminal.

According to a damning new report by The New York Times (August 1, 2025), hunger in Gaza has not only deepened—it has turned into an executioner. Not metaphorically, but quite literally. Starvation has been weaponized.

Let’s stop pretending this is about “security.” Let’s stop rehearsing the stale script of Hamas smuggling aid, a narrative Israel repeats with zero evidence. The truth, as laid bare by Israel’s own data, is that less food is entering Gaza now than at almost any point during the war—a war that has already displaced, starved, and killed tens of thousands.

This isn’t war.
This is siege warfare masked as humanitarian coordination.
And it is playing out in broad daylight, livestreamed on social media and satellites, as the so-called civilized world looks away.


A Humanitarian System Designed to Fail

In May, Israel replaced the UN-coordinated aid system with one run by the Orwellian-sounding Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (G.H.F.). "Humanitarian," except it has four aid sites for a population of over 2 million. Some days, only one site is open. None are in northern Gaza.

Let that sink in. Families have to walk for hours through active war zones to get a box of food, dodging drones, tanks, and sniper fire—not as combatants, but as civilians, many of them elderly, children, or already malnourished.

Over 600 people have been killed trying to reach these sites, according to Gaza’s health ministry.

Israel calls them "isolated incidents."
Translation: Acceptable deaths.

G.H.F. denies responsibility for the chaos surrounding its fenced, barbed-wire food dumps. But videos tell the story they won’t: panic, stampedes, tear gas, American security contractors hurling grenades into trapped lines of starving people. In one instance, 20 people died in a stampede, and the excuse? Hamas provocateurs.

Of course. Always Hamas.


Aid as Bait, Starvation as Strategy

What do you call a system that announces food distributions 30 minutes before opening and closes within 15 minutes?

A trap.

People gather in the dead of night, not knowing when—or ifaid will arrive. The routes are unclear. The military lines are arbitrary. And the moment the crowd "disobeys" an invisible boundary, bullets fly.

This isn’t humanitarian assistance. This is a snare. A hunger game, where Gazans are forced to race, scramble, and bleed for the basic right to eat. If they don’t get killed in the line, they may die at home from malnutrition.

Hospitals report severe child starvation. One in three people isn’t eating for days. Aid trucks are blocked or delayed. And still, Israel blames the UN for not doing enough.

How does the world respond?

With airdrops.

Boxes falling from the sky like divine mercy, except some land in the sea, others in Israel, and a few on people’s headskilling them. It’s a PR stunt in parachutes. Not a solution.

Even the UK admitted:

“Only trucks can deliver at the scale needed.”

And yet, those trucks sit idle, locked behind Israeli gates.


Starving a Population Is Not a Counter-Terrorism Strategy

Let us be clear: Starvation is a war crime.
Under Article 54 of the Geneva Conventions, intentionally depriving civilians of food as a method of warfare is forbidden. It’s not debatable. It’s not conditional.

Yet, for months, this is exactly what has been done in Gaza—with international complicity.

The United States continues to arm the siege. European leaders deliver speeches about restraint, then sell surveillance drones. Arab regimes offer statements of “deep concern” while denying refugees and normalizing ties with the very government starving Palestinians.

The UN? Trapped. Gutted. Undermined.

What we are witnessing is the normalization of atrocity—where children are buried by famine, and the world debates the rules of engagement.


One of NYTimes reader respond from Tel Aviv at comments section of this Article. 


The Price of Bread Is the Price of Silence

Today, in Gaza, a kilo of tomatoes is $30. A kilo of sugar: $100.

But the true cost is higher.

It’s the price of the international community’s silence. The price of every "balanced" media headline. The cost of every vetoed UN resolution. The blood price of “neutrality.”

A mother selling her wedding ring to buy powdered milk. A father kissing a soldier’s boot for a bag of flour. A child with distended belly asking for water that isn’t poisoned.

This isn’t a crisis of aid. This is a crisis of conscience.




So What Now?

Don’t say you didn’t know.
Don’t say it’s too complicated.
Don’t say we must hear both sides.
There is only one side here: the side of the starving, the displaced, the besieged.

Call it what it is:
A blockade-engineered famine.
A humanitarian catastrophe by design.
A genocide enforced by hunger.

Let every bite denied, every bullet fired at a food line, every child’s grave dug in dry earth bear witness to this moral collapse.

And let us never again confuse silence with peace.


🕊️ Share. Speak. Shatter the myth of neutrality.
🖋️ Visit: ainnbeen.blogspot.com
📢 #GazaGenocide #HungerIsAWarCrime #EndTheSiege

       (Photo by NYTimes)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...