🔴 From Paris to Gaza: Will Macron Stand Trial for Complicity in Genocide?"

✍️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍ainnbeen.blogspot.com

“Neutrality in the face of genocide is complicity. But when neutrality becomes policy—backed by weapons, drones, and vetoes—it becomes a crime.”

In a bold and unprecedented move, French lawyers and human rights organizations have taken a step that many thought unthinkable—they’re calling for international justice to pierce the veil of Western impunity. At the heart of this legal earthquake is none other than French President Emmanuel Macron.

Yes, the same Macron who champions liberté, égalité, fraternité now faces accusations of complicity in war crimes and genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

The French NGO EuroPalestine has formally filed a complaint before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), demanding an investigation into the role of Macron and other top French officials in enabling Israel’s military campaign—a campaign that, according to international aid organizations and UN bodies, has turned Gaza into a slaughterhouse.

But this isn't just about moral outrage. It’s about material complicity.

France supplied weapons, surveillance drones, and military technology that were reportedly used in Israeli bombing campaigns. French airspace and diplomacy shielded Israel’s aggression while Macron performed the familiar political ballet of “humanitarian concern” for cameras, and arms deals for cabinet rooms.

It was France that championed the ICC’s warrant for Vladimir Putin, applauding international law—until that same law turned its gaze toward Israel’s Netanyahu. Then suddenly, Macron’s administration claimed “head of state immunity”, contradicting ICC precedent and effectively undermining the very principles it invoked in Ukraine’s case.

In a world gasping under the weight of hypocrisy, this is what legal colonialism looks like: Where justice is fast-tracked for enemies, but stalled for allies—even when the bodies of 15,000+ Palestinian children lie beneath the rubble.

And now, as famine-induced deaths in Gaza mount by the hour, the silence from the Élysée Palace isn’t just deafening—it’s lethal.

Let’s be clear: This legal challenge isn’t symbolic. It signals a tectonic shift in global accountability. No longer will Western leaders hide behind the shield of “strategic alliances” and humanitarian doublespeak while they fuel the machinery of annihilation.

Human rights lawyers are demanding that the International Criminal Court (ICC) and ICJ examine Macron’s complicity not only as a passive enabler but as an active participant in a campaign that bears all the hallmarks of genocide, as noted by international legal scholars, UN officials, and even Israeli and Jewish human rights voices.

📌 This isn’t politics. It’s principle.

If Macron’s government aided and abetted a war effort that systematically starved, bombed, and ethnically cleansed a captive civilian population—then he must be held to the same standards as any other world leader. Justice must not be Western or Eastern. It must be universal—or it is nothing.

Because when lawyers in Paris risk their careers to indict their own president, they’re not just seeking accountability.
They’re reclaiming the soul of justice.

🧾 References:

🕊️ Justice delayed is complicity extended. France must choose: Will it stand with law and humanity, or with bombs and silence?

#GazaGenocide #MacronComplicity #EuroPalestine #InternationalJustice #EndImpunity #ICC #ICJ #ainnbeen

Comments

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog