Skip to main content

🇩🇪 Germany’s Tears – Not for the Starving, But for Israel’s Isolation

 



✍️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com


While one million Palestinians in Gaza edge toward famine, while hundreds of thousands of children cry themselves to sleep with bloated bellies and empty bowls, we are finally told what keeps German officials up at night.

Not the starvation. Not the corpses. Not the blockade.

But the diplomatic isolation of Israel.

Yes, you heard right. As the streets of Gaza reek of death and desperation, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul is disturbed—not by the genocidal siege—but by the possibility that the global community might start treating Israel like the apartheid regime it has chosen to become.

"The situation must fundamentally improve for the people in the Gaza Strip," he says—
But not because people are dying.
Because it might make Israel look bad.

For Mr. Wadephul, starving children are not a moral red line. They are a PR disaster. The flattened hospitals, the deliberate targeting of aid convoys, the UN’s latest report that famine in Gaza has officially reached IPC Phase 5 (Catastrophic Famine)none of that was enough to shake the West’s ironclad allegiance.

Until now.

Now, the concern is not "How do we stop this engineered famine?"
It’s "How do we stop Israel from being isolated?"

"This cannot leave Germany indifferent," Wadephul says.

No, of course not. The death of 18,592 children in Israeli airstrikes apparently could. The destruction of Gaza’s health system? The denial of baby formula and IV fluids? Indifference is policy. But isolation of Israel? Now you’ve got Berlin’s attention.

Chancellor Friedrich Merz, equally troubled, now hints that the German government may “soon decide” its next steps. No urgency. No condemnation. Just a little chin-stroking and a weekend wait for Wadephul’s trip report, as if this were a tourism review, not a war zone where humanitarian agencies are warning that children are dying of starvation at unprecedented rates.

Let’s be clear: Germany is not worried about Palestinians. It’s worried about the optics of complicity. Worried that the mask of Western “values” is slipping too fast. That too many are noticing the hypocrisy of a continent that once said “Never Again” with tears and candles—only to now arm and shield a regime committing those same atrocities in real-time.

Wadephul wants a ceasefire—not for peace, but to manage perception. He wants hostages released—not to save lives, but to ease pressure on an ally now openly accused of genocide by the International Court of Justice.

It’s a shameful moment for a nation that could have led with moral clarity. Instead, Germany clutches its alliance while Gaza clutches the bodies of children bloated with hunger and buried in rubble.






Every time a Western official speaks of "concerns" while Palestinians are being starved and slaughtered, a new chapter is written—not in the history of diplomacy, but in the history of betrayal.

Germany has chosen its side.
It is not with the hungry.
It is not with the truth.
It is not with the victims.

It is with the architect of the famine.

And history, as it always does, will remember.


📌 Follow for more unfiltered truth: ainnbeen.blogspot.com
📸 Image idea: German foreign minister standing with Israeli leaders while a child behind barbed wire holds an empty bowl.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

đź“… July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  đź“° The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com đź“… July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from CafĂ© Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilĂ ! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...