Skip to main content

Arab League’s Declaration: Disarmament Demands Amid Death, Drought, and Decay

 


✍️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com



In Gaza, Category Five famine is not a looming threat. It’s a daily death sentence.
Hospitals have collapsed. Water is poison. Bread is a memory.
And as mothers cradle the brittle bones of their starving babies, the Arab League stands tall—not with the people, but with the paper.

On July 31, 2025, in an air-conditioned conference hall far from the smell of decaying bodies and bombed-out maternity wards, 22 Arab states signed a declaration at the UNnot to end the siege, not to demand an airlift of food or medicine, but to ask Hamas to disarm.

Let that sink in.
Not a single binding demand to stop the Israeli airstrikes.
Not a word on the siege that has turned Gaza into a caged famine zone.
Not a sentence on the white phosphorus, the starvation campaign, or the mass graves.

Instead, the League decided to publicly parrot the talking points of Tel Aviv and Washingtonblaming the last remaining resistance for daring to survive.

Hamas must end its rule in Gaza,” the declaration reads,
while Gaza’s children end their lives in the dust, dehydrated and voiceless.

How courageous.

This declaration—endorsed by the full cast of "Arab Moderates™," co-signed by the European Union and 17 others—comes during a UN conference supposedly about peace. But let’s be clear: this is not peace. This is performance.

A temporary international stabilization force” is proposed to enter Gaza—but only if Hamas hands over its weapons.
And what will they stabilize?
The hunger? The mass graves? The drone-bombed hospitals?

No.
They will stabilize the illusion of progress
.
They will stabilize the occupation, rebranded.
They will stabilize a Palestinian Authority so spineless it can't even govern Ramallah without Israeli permission.

Meanwhile, Israel continues its rampage.
Washington vetoes every attempt at accountability.
And Arab regimes, many of whom rule with iron fists and foreign military bases on their soil, have finally found their voice—not to shout against genocide, but to whisper for disarmament.

Hamas responded, rightfully, that the “Palestinian situation is an internal affair.” But that’s not what this is about anymore. This is not just an occupation. It is liquidation. And the so-called “New York Declaration” is not a road map to statehood—it’s a eulogy delivered with a smile.

Where was the Arab League when premature babies died from lack of oxygen?
Where were these 22 states when UN trucks were turned back at gunpoint?
Where was this historic unity when mass graves were uncovered in Khan Younis and Deir al-Balah?

But now—now they unite. To ask the besieged to surrender.
To ask the caged to hand the keys to their jailers.
To ask the wounded to crawl to the operating table on their own and smile while they’re dissected.

This is not diplomacy.
This is betrayal in a business suit.
This is Abu Ghraib politics, with Arabic subtitles and a European accent.

Let’s not forget the optics:
The world watches, half-blind and wholly hypocritical, as Gaza burns and babies starve—and Arab leaders talk about elections and arms control.

“Talk about integrating the Zionist entity into the region is a reward to the enemy for its crimes,” Hamas said.
For once, the world should listen.

Because in Gaza, the real disarmament already happened.
They were disarmed of food.
Disarmed of water.
Disarmed of hope.

But not yet of memory.
Not yet of truth.

And never of resistance.


🔻 To the children of Gaza, no declaration can replace bread. No stabilization force can bury your pain. But history will remember who raised their voices—and who handed the murderers more ink for their pen.
We will not forget. We will not forgive silence dressed in suits.
📍ainnbeen.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famine by design, Silence by Choice: 90,000 children are dying and still the UN can't find it's Spine.

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 22, 2025 📍 From the graveyard of global morality: Gaza Let’s be clear. If a three-month-old baby named Yehia dies of starvation in his mother’s arms at Nasser Hospital, that should be enough for the world to say: “Enough.” But in today’s U.N., apparently 90,000 malnourished children, daily starvation deaths, and food rotting at the Gaza border still don’t meet the “technical ” threshold for famine . Welcome to the age of data-driven genocide , where unless a corpse is tagged with the right IPC Level 5 barcode , it's not really dead enough to matter. 📉 No Data? No Problem. Just Ignore the Bones. Let’s break this down. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) — a bureaucratic tool forged in the fires of humanitarian intention — tells us that famine exists when: 20% of households face extreme food shortage, Acute malnutrition in children exceeds 30%, Deaths exceed 2 per 10,000 per day. But wait — Gaza’s under siege, aid...

🏗️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

📅 July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  📰 The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com 📅 July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Café Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

“Starving to Death, But Very Politely” — Gaza’s Famine and the Theater of Moral Collapse

📍Blog: ainnbeen.blogspot.com ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 25, 2025 Let us all pause and thank the New York Times . After 21 months of bombing , blockade, and bullets , we finally have permission — no, confirmation — from America’s journal of record that yes, Gazans are, in fact, dying of starvation. The paper even sent reporters to Haifa, Jerusalem, and London — not Gaza, of course — to deliver the news. Skeletal toddlers, lactating mothers without milk, IV drips rationed like treasure — all neatly documented, sanitized, and wrapped in diplomatic passive voice. But fear not. The famine is not the fault of any one side. It's simply the result of “human failings , ” the report says. Ah yes, the tragedy of equal blame . A little siege here, a little looting there — and voilà! Starvation appears like a natural disaster . Like a famine tsunami . No perpetrators. Just poor little victims. Meanwhile, Israel, the world’s most moral occupier™ , is gallantly uploading videos of...

🩸 "If It Were Really Genocide, Wouldn’t More People Be Dead?" — The Cruel Logic of Bret Stephens

  ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar | July 23, 2025 So let’s all take a moment to appreciate the cold brilliance of Bret Stephens , New York Times columnist and self-appointed moral compass for the apocalypse. In his latest masterstroke of ethical reasoning , he argues that the claim of genocide in Gaza rings hollow — not because tens of thousands haven’t been killed , but because not enough have. “It may seem harsh to say, but there is a glaring dissonance to the charge that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” “If the Israeli government’s intentions and actions are truly genocidal — if it is so malevolent that it is committed to the annihilation of Gazans — why hasn’t it been more methodical and vastly more deadly?” Ah yes, the ol’ “ not genocidal enough” defense — a timeless classic. You see, according to Stephens, genocide must be more “ methodical ,” more “ deadly .” A mere 60,000 deaths (as reported by Gaza’s health ministry) over two years of war doesn’t meet the qu...