Skip to main content

When Dissent Became a Crime: Australia, Isaac Herzog, and the Crushing of Protest

 



In early February 2026, Australia presented itself to the world as a democracy committed to free expression, human rights, and the rule of law. Yet in its streets — particularly in Sydney — those ideals were tested, strained, and for many protesters, violently denied.

The occasion was the official visit of Israeli President Isaac Herzog. The response was one of the largest, most forcefully policed pro-Palestinian mobilisations in recent Australian history.

What unfolded was not merely a protest against a visiting head of state. It was a confrontation between citizens demanding accountability and a state determined to shield power from dissent.

Why Herzog’s Visit Sparked Outrage

Isaac Herzog arrived in Australia for a high-profile visit framed by the government as an act of solidarity following the December 2025 Bondi Beach attack, in which civilians were killed at a Jewish community event. The visit included meetings with political leaders, memorial events, and appearances with Jewish community representatives.

For many Australians, however, Herzog is not a neutral figure of mourning.

As Israel’s president during the 2023–2025 Gaza war, Herzog repeatedly issued statements portraying the conflict as a collective struggle, remarks widely cited by human-rights groups and genocide scholars as contributing to the dehumanisation of Palestinians. Protesters argued that welcoming Herzog without accountability amounted to normalising mass civilian death, starvation, and displacement in Gaza.

The central message echoed across cities was blunt:

“War criminals are not welcome.”

Nationwide Protests: From Sydney to Melbourne

Large demonstrations took place across Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Canberra, organised by coalitions including:

  • Palestine Action Group
  • Students for Palestine
  • Muslim community organisations
  • Jewish anti-Zionist groups
  • Civil-liberties advocates and trade unionists

Protesters carried Palestinian flags, placards demanding Herzog’s arrest under international law, and banners condemning Australia’s diplomatic support for Israel amid mounting evidence of war crimes.

But it was Sydney — the focal point of Herzog’s visit — that became the epicentre of confrontation.

The Legal Weaponisation of “Public Order”

Before protesters even reached the streets, the NSW government moved to neutralise dissent.

Herzog’s visit was declared a “major event” under the NSW Major Events Act, a designation usually reserved for sporting tournaments or large festivals. This extraordinary step granted police sweeping powers, including:

  • Vast exclusion zones across Sydney’s CBD
  • Stop-and-search authority without warrant
  • “Move-on” orders carrying fines of thousands of dollars
  • Restrictions on march routes and assembly points

When the Palestine Action Group challenged these powers in court, arguing they were designed to suppress political protest rather than ensure safety, the challenge was dismissed.

The message was clear: protest was technically legal — but only if it was invisible, contained, and obedient.

February 9, 2026: Policing by Force

On February 9, thousands gathered near Sydney Town Hall in defiance of the restrictions.

What followed shocked many Australians.

Pepper Spray and Physical Violence

Police deployed in riot gear used pepper spray against protesters at close range. Video footage and eyewitness accounts documented officers:

  • Spraying indiscriminately into dense crowds
  • Punching and dragging protesters, including those with hands raised
  • Kettling demonstrators, trapping them before forcibly dispersing them
  • Disrupting Muslim prayer during the rally

Many protesters described the violence as unprovoked, stating that they were attempting to comply or peacefully regroup when police advanced.

Arrests and Intimidation

At least 27 protesters were arrested. Police accused organisers of incitement and protesters of breaching restricted zones — zones that critics argued had been deliberately drawn to make meaningful protest impossible.

Civil-liberties groups warned that the policing tactics resembled crowd-control methods used against unrest, not democratic protest.

Official Response: Blame the Protesters

NSW Police leadership defended the actions as necessary to maintain order and protect a visiting dignitary. Senior officials characterised protesters as aggressive and irresponsible.

But for many observers, this framing collapsed under the weight of visual evidence.

Human-rights lawyers, journalists, and community leaders questioned how a democracy could justify chemical spray against peaceful demonstrators, especially when the protest concerned alleged crimes against civilians abroad.

What Australia Revealed About Itself

The Herzog protests exposed several uncomfortable truths:

1. Free Speech Has Conditions
When dissent targets powerful allies, protest rights become fragile — conditional on silence and compliance.

2. International Politics Now Shape Domestic Policing
The defence of a foreign leader accused of war crimes was prioritised over the bodily safety of Australian citizens.

3. Moral Outrage Is Being Criminalised
To protest mass civilian suffering is increasingly treated not as conscience, but as disruption.

A Defining Moment

These protests were not about antisemitism, nor about violence. They were about accountability, equality before the law, and the right to say no — even when power demands applause.

Australia’s streets in February 2026 did not erupt because of chaos. They erupted because too many people refused to pretend that genocide can be politely ignored.

History will not ask how well the visit was secured.

It will ask why peaceful dissent had to be beaten back to protect a narrative of innocence.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

  By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...
Post a Comment
Read more

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...
Post a Comment
Read more