Skip to main content

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )



We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know.

From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility.

This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated. And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas.

Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi.

The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One

From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options—stay and starve, or leave.

This was not the language of counterterrorism. It was the language of population management.

When Israeli leaders spoke of cutting off food, fuel, water, and electricity—when they openly declared their intention to make Gaza “unlivable”—the target was not Hamas. Hamas does not drink from Gaza’s aquifers. Hamas does not rely on neonatal incubators. Hamas does not starve when bakeries are destroyed.

And when Prime Minister Netanyahu invoked the biblical command to “remember Amalek”—a command that explicitly calls for the destruction of every man, woman, child, and even livestock—the implication was unmistakable. This was not about armed militants. It was about a people.

Why South Africa Prosecuted Genocide, Not War Crimes

This is why South Africa’s case at the International Court of Justice mattered so profoundly.

South Africa did not accuse Israel of merely violating the laws of war. It did not call for meetings of Geneva Convention signatories to adjudicate breaches of international humanitarian law. It did something far more consequential: it charged Israel with the crime of genocide.

If one reads South Africa’s December 29, 2023 application carefully, one notices something striking—Hamas is barely mentioned.

Not because South Africa sought to excuse Hamas.

But because it understood that Hamas was irrelevant to what was unfolding.

From October 8 onward, the defining feature of Israel’s campaign was not combat, but destruction: saturated bombing, infrastructure annihilation, enforced starvation, and mass displacement. Hamas was not the object. Hamas was the pretext.

Genocide, as Norman Finkelstein argues, may not have been the declared objective—but it was the chosen method. The objective was ethnic cleansing. And Israel demonstrated a willingness to destroy part—or all—of Gaza’s population to achieve it.



The Fiction of Precision and the Myth of Numbers

Israel claimed, early on, that Gaza contained 20,000 Hamas fighters—a figure pulled from thin air, repeated without evidence, and never substantiated.

How could such a number be verified under conditions of carpet bombing?

Israel does not know how many Hamas members it killed. It cannot know. When entire neighborhoods are obliterated, the dead are labeled posthumously. Guilt is assigned by proximity. Presence becomes proof.

And yet, months later, Israel claimed that 20,000 Hamas fighters still remained.

The number never changes because its function is not factual—it is rhetorical. As long as Hamas exists in sufficient quantity, Israel can justify continued occupation, blocked aid, stalled reconstruction, and permanent siege.

Hamas, in this sense, becomes indispensable. It is the movable prop in an exterminatory enterprise.

Weaponizing Starvation and the Theater of Aid

International resolutions promised humanitarian relief. Six hundred aid trucks per day. Reconstruction plans. Boards of peace. Stabilization forces.

None of it was real.

Israel made clear it would admit no more than a “humanitarian minimum”—a calibrated quantity of aid designed not to alleviate suffering, but to prevent outright death while maintaining collective punishment.

Starvation was not a side effect of war. It was a method of warfare.

Projects like the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation revealed the underlying intent. Aid distribution sites were placed strategically—three of the four near the Egyptian border—designed to funnel desperate civilians toward expulsion routes.

The plan failed to produce a flood of refugees. Egypt resisted. International pressure mounted. Israel adjusted.

The strategy shifted from mass expulsion to slow attrition. From flood to trickle.

Reconstruction, meanwhile, was always a fantasy. After devoting years to turning Gaza into rubble, the notion that Israel would suddenly rebuild it alongside its survivors was not naïve—it was obscene.

A National Project, Not a Rogue Government

Perhaps the most uncomfortable truth exposed is this: the destruction of Gaza was not merely Netanyahu’s war.

Polling data inside Israel tells a damning story.

From the earliest days after October 7, approximately 95 percent of Jewish Israelis believed the army was using either sufficient force or too little force. Only five percent believed it was using too much.

One poll found that 47 percent of Israeli Jews supported killing everyone when the army enters a city.

Another found that 62 percent believed there are no innocents in Gaza—where roughly half the population are children.

This was not fringe extremism. It was societal consensus.

The genocide in Gaza was not simply a state project. It was a national project—endorsed, embraced, and executed by a citizen army.



Demilitarization for Them, Impunity for Israel

International proposals demanded Gaza’s demilitarization, justified by October 7.

But this logic collapses under scrutiny.

If armed resistance disqualifies Palestinians from sovereignty, then what does genocide require of Israel?

International law is clear: people living under occupation are not debarred from armed resistance. Occupying powers, however, are prohibited from using armed force to suppress civilian populations.

Yet demilitarization is demanded only of the occupied. Never of the occupier.

The question is never asked: after October 8 onward, does Israel not also require demilitarization?

The silence is the answer.



The Illusion of a Political Roadmap

UN resolutions speak of Palestinian Authority “reform,” benchmarks, milestones, and credible pathways.

But reform according to whose standards?

Egypt? Jordan? Saudi Arabia? Authoritarian regimes that jail dissidents, crush opposition, and fear Palestinian self-determination more than Israeli domination?

Even total compliance offers no guarantee. The language is deliberately evasive: reform may lead to a credible pathway. A pathway to what? That will be decided by Israel.

In effect, Israel retains veto power over Palestinian self-determination, statehood, and even its own military withdrawal.

Rights become conditional. Justice becomes negotiable. International law is annulled.

Arm-Twisting and the Collapse of Diplomacy

Why did UN member states acquiesce?

Because Gaza has no power.

Its symbolic power—once central to Arab and Muslim political identity—has been eroded by decades of regional catastrophe: Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan.



With no material leverage and diminished symbolic resonance, Gaza became expendable.

Add to this the crude coercion of great powers. Threats of tariffs, sanctions, defunding, and economic ruin replaced diplomacy. Votes were extracted, not persuaded.

This was not consensus. It was submission.

What Comes Next

Israel has seized more than half of Gaza. Reconstruction is blocked. Aid is restricted to subsistence levels. Water is unsafe. Medical systems are shattered. Families live in ruins.

There are no grounds for optimism.

But despair is not an argument for silence.

History teaches only one certainly: however bad things are, they can always become worse.

Resistance, then, is not always about victory. Sometimes it is about refusal—refusal to lie, refusal to normalize, refusal to forget.

In a world trained to watch without feeling, bearing witness becomes an act of defiance.

And naming genocide, when genocide is unfolding, becomes a moral obligation—not a political choice.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Crusaders Go Digital: Old Wars, New Costumes, Same Bloodlust

History, it seems, has developed a dark sense of humor. After centuries of reflection, scholarship, and solemn declarations of “never again,” we now find elected officials—armed not with swords but with AI filters —cosplaying as Crusaders . Progress , apparently, means upgrading from iron armor to algorithmic propaganda. Let’s begin where this story actually starts—not in Washington, not in Tel Aviv, but nearly a thousand years ago, when Europe launched what it called “holy wars.” ⚔️ The Original Crusades: A Brief Reminder The Crusades (1095–1291) were not a single war but a series of campaigns initiated after Pope Urban II’s call at Clermont in 1095. His message was simple and devastatingly effective: reclaim Jerusalem, and God will reward you. What followed was not a clean clash of armies, but waves of violence that engulfed entire regions—from France and Germany through Hungary, into Byzantium, Antioch, and Palestine. Historians caution that medieval records are fragmented, but acro...
Post a Comment
Read more

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...
Post a Comment
Read more

Israel Running Critically Low on Missile Interceptors

  Israel–Iran War Day 15 Report Date: March 13, 2026 1. Israel Warns the U.S. of Interceptor Shortage According to reporting by , Israeli officials privately informed Washington that Israel’s stockpile of ballistic missile interceptors is being rapidly depleted as the war with continues. U.S. officials told Semafor that: Israel’s interceptor inventory is approaching critically low levels . The shortage involves missiles used to intercept Iranian ballistic missile attacks . The United States had already been aware of the risk for months . One U.S. official said: “It’s something we expected and anticipated.” The comment suggests that U.S. defense planners had already predicted that Israel’s defensive systems could face strain in a prolonged war. 2. Israel’s Missile Defense System Under Heavy Strain Israel’s air-defense architecture relies on several layers , including: 1. Iron Dome. Designed to intercept short-range rockets . Mainly used against rockets from ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...
Post a Comment
Read more