Skip to main content

The Architecture of Erasure

 



Francesca Albanese. 

“The common enemy of humanity is the system that has enabled the genocide in Palestine — including the financial capital that funds it, the algorithms that obscure it, and the weapons that enable it.

It is a system that normalizes destruction as security, occupation as defense, starvation as policy, and silence as diplomacy. It is sustained not only by bombs and bullets, but by boardrooms, media narratives, diplomatic shields, and public indifference.

The tragedy is not only that Palestinians are being erased — it is that international law is being hollowed out in plain sight. When accountability becomes optional for the powerful, humanity itself becomes collateral damage.

The question before us is not merely about Palestine. It is about whether the world still believes in justice, or whether power has finally replaced principle as the highest law.”


The System Is the Crime

There is something deeply unsettling about what said.

Not because it is radical.
Not because it is inflammatory.
But because it is precise.

“The common enemy of humanity is the system…”

Not a people.
Not a religion.
Not a nation.

A system.

And that distinction changes everything.


Beyond Bombs: The Invisible Architecture of Destruction

Wars are not sustained by rage alone. They are engineered.

They require:

  • Banks to finance them.
  • Corporations to manufacture weapons.
  • Politicians to authorize transfers.
  • Media narratives to soften the language.
  • Algorithms to suppress uncomfortable footage.
  • Diplomatic vetoes to shield accountability.

Bombs fall from planes.
But systems decide where they fall.

When hospitals are reduced to rubble, when food convoys are struck, when entire neighborhoods disappear from maps — this is not chaos. It is administration.

It is paperwork.

It is policy.


The Machinery of Normalization

The most dangerous part of a system is not its violence.

It is its normalization.

Language is cleaned:

  • “Civilian casualties” instead of children.
  • “Security operations” instead of siege.
  • “Collateral damage” instead of families erased.

Financial flows are sanitized. Arms deals are described as “defense cooperation.” Censorship is framed as “content moderation.”

And slowly, horror becomes procedural.


Algorithms as Modern Gatekeepers

In previous genocides, silence required physical distance.

Today, silence is engineered digitally.

Images disappear.
Accounts are shadow-banned.
Words trigger moderation filters.

The violence happens in high definition — yet the narrative is blurred.

When algorithms decide which suffering trends and which suffering disappears, they become participants.

Not by pulling triggers.
But by muting witnesses.


The Hollowing of International Law

International law was built on the ashes of World War II.

“Never again” was meant to be universal.

But what happens when accountability depends on geopolitics?

When the powerful are immune from consequence, the law does not merely fail — it decays.

And when law decays, morality becomes selective.

If siege, starvation, and collective punishment can be justified under the banner of security, then the precedent is global.

Palestine becomes a laboratory.


This Is Bigger Than One Territory

Albanese’s warning is not territorial. It is systemic.

If:

  • Financial capital can fund devastation without scrutiny,
  • Media ecosystems can shape perception to neutralize outrage,
  • Governments can shield allies from investigation,

Then the system is telling us something chilling:

Power has replaced principle.

And once that shift is complete, no population is truly safe.


The Real Question

The real question is not whether one agrees with every word spoken.

The real question is this:

If international law applies selectively, is it still law?

If human rights are negotiable, are they still rights?

If entire populations can be besieged in full global view — and nothing changes — what exactly have we built since 1945?


The System Thrives on Indifference

Systems do not require hatred from everyone.

They require apathy from enough.

They require distraction. They require fatigue. They require people to say, “It’s complicated.”

But some things are not complicated:

Children should not starve. Hospitals should not be bombed. Civilians should not be collectively punished.

If stating those principles becomes controversial, the system has already succeeded.


A Moral Crossroads

History rarely announces itself in the present tense.

But moments come when the architecture of power is laid bare.

This may be one of them.

When a UN Special Rapporteur speaks of a system enabling atrocity, she is not merely describing policy — she is issuing a warning.

The erosion of accountability in one place corrodes justice everywhere.


Final Reflection

The common enemy of humanity is not identity.

It is impunity.

It is the normalization of cruelty. It is the monetization of suffering. It is the digital filtering of conscience.

And unless that system is confronted — legally, politically, and morally — the phrase “never again” will remain what it has too often become:

A slogan.

Not a shield.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...

Noam Chomsky and the Silence That Broke a Generation

There are betrayals that anger us. And then there are betrayals that leave us quiet. Noam Chomsky belongs to the second kind. For more than half a century, Chomsky stood as a moral compass in an age without direction . He taught generations how power lies, how empires manufacture consent, how language itself becomes a weapon in the hands of elites. He spoke for the voiceless when it was costly, unfashionable, and dangerous . For many of us, he was not merely an intellectual —he was a refuge . Proof that clarity could survive corruption. Proof that integrity could endure. Which is why this moment does not feel like scandal . It feels like mourning . Chris Hedges is right to frame the association between Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein not as gossip or moral theater, but as a rupture —a crack in something we believed was unbreakable . Epstein was not simply a criminal. He was the embodiment of everything Chomsky spent his life exposing : elite impunity, predation disguised as ...