The initial question is simple, stark, and loaded: "Israel has two million Arab citizens. Name any Arab country that has two million Jews population."
On its surface, this rhetorical question—often deployed in public discourse—attempts to frame Israel as a bastion of tolerance and diversity by highlighting the presence of a large minority group, while simultaneously chastising Arab states for their near-total lack of Jewish populations.
But this comparison is less a balanced equation and more a deliberate apples-to-oranges fallacy. It fundamentally ignores the crucial distinction between having a minority population and granting that minority group genuine, equitable citizenship in a state defined by the majority's identity.
The Flaw in the Comparison
When we look at the Arab-Israeli population, we are talking about Palestinian citizens of Israel—a remnant population that remained within the 1948 borders of the newly declared state. They are not immigrants; they are indigenous to the land.
The correct counter-question, which exposes the rhetorical trick, is to ask: Do those two million Arab citizens enjoy true, equal belonging?
For many, the answer is a resounding no.
The state of Israel is legally defined by its Jewish character, most recently enshrined in the controversial 2018 Nation-State Law, which defines the exercise of "national self-determination in the State of Israel" as unique to the Jewish people and effectively demotes Arabic from an official language. This legal foundation means that while Palestinian citizens have the right to vote and hold Israeli passports, their national and cultural identity is systematically marginalized.
The Real Threat: Repression, Not Rhetoric
The idea that Arab citizens are merely "in continual under threat" is not just rhetorical; it's a daily, lived reality, particularly in times of conflict. The statistics gathered since the October 7, 2023, attacks reveal the nature of this threat: it is overwhelmingly institutional and punitive.
Since the start of the conflict, the state has wielded its power to silence and punish. The "attacks" on Arab citizens are less often physical confrontations and more often systemic repression driven by hyper-vigilance and fear of dissent:
- The Censorship Wave: The most severe crackdown has been on freedom of expression. Legal centers like Adalah have documented over 645 arrests of Palestinian citizens for speech-related offenses on social media—posts deemed "incitement" or "support for terrorism." These arrests were often made for seemingly minor acts, such as expressing solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza or changing a profile picture.
- Economic and Academic Purges: This institutional pressure extended into daily life. Over 100 workers were reportedly fired or suspended, and at least 108 students faced disciplinary measures, including outright expulsion from universities. The crime? Social media posts that deviated from the official Israeli narrative. Doctors, nurses, and teachers lost their livelihoods for expressing private political views, illustrating a clear pattern of state-sanctioned persecution against citizens.
- Suppression of Assembly: Furthermore, police actively prevented and dispersed protests organized by Arab citizens, suppressing their legal right to assembly and voice dissent against the conflict.
The question of why Arab states do not have two million Jewish citizens is one tied to historical expulsions, the rise of Arab nationalism, and the political reality of the Arab-Israeli conflict. But it should never be used to distract from the reality faced by Palestinian citizens of Israel.
The issue is not the number of citizens from a minority group, but the quality of their citizenship. When a state's foundational law and its swift actions during a crisis prioritize one national identity over another, the minority—despite possessing a passport—is relegated to a position of constant vulnerability, where their very identity is deemed a security threat.
Comments