Skip to main content

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

 


There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language.

Gaza is living inside such a moment.

The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary. And in the modern age, vocabulary is power. If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience.

First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war, despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it.

This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack.

The Illusion of Restraint

A slowed rate of killing is not mercy. It is strategy.

An average of six Palestinians are killed each day under the so-called ceasefire — down from hundreds before. But death by attrition is still death. Hunger, disease, exposure, untreated wounds, and psychological collapse do not register as spectacular violence, yet they are no less lethal. Genocide does not require gas chambers when starvation and displacement do the work just as efficiently.

Aid trucks trickle in — just enough to keep people alive, not enough to restore life. Reconstruction is prohibited. Cement is banned. Steel is blocked. Water systems remain shattered. Electricity is a memory. Gaza is being preserved not as a society, but as a humanitarian exhibit of controlled decay.

This is not accidental. It is policy.

Law Reduced to Theater

International law has not failed because it was powerless. It has failed because it was abandoned.

Binding orders from the International Court of Justice are ignored with impunity. The Genocide Convention is treated as an inconvenience. Advisory opinions are dismissed as noise. What remains is a new doctrine: law applies only to the weak. Power alone determines truth.

When the U.N. Security Council endorses a peace plan that excludes the very people being destroyed, it does not broker peace — it launders violence. When powerful states abstain rather than oppose, they perform a ritual of moral cowardice. Silence, dressed up as diplomacy, becomes complicity.

This is how empires behave in their decline: they no longer bother to justify their crimes. They simply rename them.

The Colonial Future on Offer

The fantasy now being sold is obscene in its audacity.

A “Gaza Riviera.” A “special economic zone.” A territory ruled by private investors and enforced by mercenaries. Palestinians are invited to exchange land for digital tokens, dignity for displacement, history for exile. Colonialism, once again, promises development as it perfects dispossession.

The language is familiar. It has always been familiar. Indigenous peoples everywhere have been offered “modernization” in exchange for disappearance. Gaza is merely the latest laboratory.

The word voluntary is doing heavy lifting here. There is nothing voluntary about leaving a land turned uninhabitable by design.

The Moral Collapse Within

Perhaps the most chilling aspect of this genocide is not only the bombs, but the applause.

Surveys show widespread support within Israeli society for ethnic cleansing and mass killing. Social media platforms overflow with incitement, mockery, and celebration of Palestinian suffering. Golden nooses are worn as political symbols. Death penalties are proposed with casual cruelty.

When a society begins to aestheticize annihilation, when suffering becomes entertainment, when cruelty becomes identitythe descent is complete.

This is not security. It is moral disintegration.

Slow Motion Erasure

Gaza is being compressedphysically, politically, morally — into a shrinking cage. Arbitrary lines shift. Those who cross them are shot. Children wander into death zones because hunger does not recognize military maps.

Ninety percent of homes are damaged or destroyed. Millions of tons of toxic rubble bury the dead and poison the living. Corpses decay beneath the ruins while the world debates semantics.

This is what genocide looks like in the age of livestreams and euphemisms.

The Lie That Sustains It All

The greatest lie is not that this will bring peace.

The greatest lie is that we do not know.

We know. We have watched. We have scrolled. We have refreshed our feeds and gone to sleep. History will not ask whether the evidence was sufficient. It will ask why language mattered more than life.

Genocide does not end when the killing slows. It ends when the intent is dismantled, when the machinery is stopped, when the perpetrators are restrained, and when the victims are allowed to live — not merely survive.

Until then, Gaza is not post-war.

It is post-illusion.

And the crime continues — rebranded, and carried out in plain sight.



📊 Help Improve This Blog (30-Second Survey)

Dear reader,
I've noticed many readers come from Singapore and Hong Kong. To better serve your interests, I'd appreciate knowing:

1. What brings you to this blog?




2. How did you first find this blog?




3. Optional: Your main field/interests?

All responses anonymous

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

  By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...