Skip to main content

Trump’s Twenty Miracles: How to Rebrand a Quagmire as Civilization’s “Great Day”

 





By Malik Mukhtar | ainnbeen.blogspot.com


Introduction: A “New Gaza” or the Same Old Mirage?

Two years after Gaza was buried under its own ashes, the world is once again being asked to clap for “peace.”
Donald J. Trump, self-proclaimed peacemaker of the century, has unveiled his latest script — a 20-point plan to build a “New Gaza.It’s being hailed as a turning point in civilization, a triumph of diplomacy, a fresh dawn.

But scratch the gold plating, and it’s just the same machinery of  dressed in a new marketing campaign.
Yossi Alpher, a seasoned Israeli strategist, calls it what it is: another exercise in repackaging disaster as deliverance.


The Art of the Ceasefire Deal

Alpher breaks it down with surgical precision.
Trump’s points three through eight — ceasefire, partial withdrawal, hostage swaps, humanitarian corridors — might actually happen. Why? Because they’ve all happened before.

It’s déjà vu diplomacythe illusion of progress, choreographed by the same players who profit from the performance.
The victims remain the same. The ruins remain the same. Only the language changes.

Meanwhile, points one, two, and nine through twentythe lofty promises of “deradicalization,” “self-determination,” and “reconstruction” — belong to the museum of failed peace plans. Words polished smooth by repetition, emptied of meaning by time.




Spoilers, Convenient and Otherwise

In this tragic theater, every actor has a role.

  • Palestinian Islamic Jihad remains the catch-all villain.
  • Hamas is expected to surrender its arms and dignity simultaneously.
  • And Netanyahu’s Kahanist coalition? They cling to their seats, dreaming of “transfer” and “Riviera projects.”

If irony were a state policy, this would be Israel’s most successful export.


Trump’s Peace Theater

The casting is flawless.
Trump — the salesman-turned-savior demands applause for “ending” a war whose embers he helped fan. Netanyahu, humiliated yet unbroken, plays the reluctant actor pretending it was all his idea.

Meanwhile, Qatar and Turkey walk away as “regional winners,” not for championing justice, but for mastering the choreography of convenience. The Doha royals, now blessed with new U.S. guarantees, might as well hang a framed print of that infamous photoBibi apologizing, Trump smirking, and history sighing in the corner.

And then there’s Tony Blair, the ghost of Iraq’s destruction, resurrected to manage Gaza’s “reconstruction.” The same man who once preached democracy from a tank turret now promises reform through “stabilization.”

If absurdity were a development plan, this one would already be funded.


Israel’s Moral Defeat

Alpher’s verdict is chilling: Israel may have won militarily, but it has lost morally, internationally, and economically.

It’s a strange kind of victory — the kind that requires an apology to Trump, the loss of global sympathy, and a society unable to look its own reflection in the eye.

But the West has perfected the art of selective amnesia. The same capitals that armed the war now fund the “peace.” The same media that justified the famine now write about “hope.”



In the end, Gaza’s suffering is simply rebranded as another line item in the global charity ledger.





The Mirage of “New Gaza”

Let’s be clear: Gaza does not need a New Gaza.”
It needs justice, freedom, and a future not written by its oppressors.

No photo-op in Doha, no apology from Bibi, no handshake choreographed by Trump’s PR team can cleanse the rubble of its truth. What Gaza needs is not “stability” — it’s liberation from those who define stability as silence.



Trump’s twenty points might pause the bombs.
But if peace without accountability is the goal, then the plan is just another chapter in the long book of global hypocrisy.




Epilogue: The Repetition That Kills

Two years since October 7, the world still expects Gaza to rise from dust without demanding justice from those who made it dust.

Perhaps Trump will indeed make history.
But for Gaza, history has never been the problem.
It’s the repetition that kills.


Written by Malik Mukhtar
Activist, Writer, and Author of the upcoming book
“Grotesque Death of Zionism: Livestream in the Court of History.”

👉 Read more at ainnbeen.blogspot.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...