Skip to main content

Trump is an accomplice to genocide. This forum is a mute witness to a genocide.” Gustavo Petro.

 



Trump, Gaza, and the Sword of Bolívar: Gustavo Petro’s Bold Indictment at the UN

Trump is an accomplice to genocide. This forum is a mute witness to a genocide.
Gustavo Petro, President of Colombia, UN General Assembly 2025

Colombian President Gustavo Petro did what few leaders of the so-called “international community” have dared: he broke the suffocating silence. From the UN podium, his words tore through the sterile language of “conflict management” and “peace processes,” stripping away the diplomatic varnish to name what is unfolding in Gaza with unmistakable clarity — genocide.

Petro did not stop there. He declared that diplomacy had failed, words were no longer enough, and called for the creation of an international armed force of nations “that do not accept genocide.” Unlike the traditional UN peacekeeping missions paralyzed by Security Council vetoes, Petro’s proposal was radical: a moral coalition prepared to act where global institutions have collapsed into complicity.

In a fiery invocation of Latin America’s liberator, he reminded the world of Simón Bolívar’s cry: Liberty or death.” For Petro, Gaza is not just a humanitarian tragedy — it is a test of humanity’s will to resist tyranny and empire.

This was more than a speech; it was an indictment. Not only of Trump and the United States, whose weapons and vetoes sustain Israel’s war, but of the United Nations itself — which Petro accused of being a silent accomplice to mass slaughter. His words resonated because they pierced the veil of neutrality, the polite silence of Western powers, and the moral cowardice of leaders who wring their hands while famine, bombardment, and mass displacement annihilate an entire people.

Petro’s boldness matters. It signals a new rupture in the global order: voices from the Global South refusing to be muted, refusing to bow to the dictatorship of Western vetoes. His call is not merely rhetorical — it is a challenge to nations to choose sides, to decide whether they will stand with genocide or with life.

History will not remember the UN’s silence with kindness. But it may remember Petro’s speech as a line drawn in the sand — the moment a leader dared to say, with Bolívar’s sword raised high: enough.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“They Came Home Broken":The Brutal Truth Behind the October 2025 Palestinian Releases

  They walked free —yet came home with broken bodies , shattered spirits , and scars that cannot be erased. On October 13, 2025, nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees were released from Israeli custody in return for hostages freed by Hamas. Many rejoiced; families wept with relief. But behind those scenes, a darker story surfaced—one of systemic abuse, medical neglect, and a betrayal of human dignity. The Faces Behind the Numbers Among those finally returned was Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya , a beloved hospital doctor in Gaza, whose ordeal reveals the brutality that many are still too afraid to speak about. He arrived having lost more than 20 kg in just two months , with fractured ribs from interrogation , a worsening heart condition denied proper medical attention , and the scars of solitary confinement and torture. He is not alone. In the landmark “ Welcome to Hell ” report, 55 formerly held Palestinians shared chilling testimonies : starvation diets, savage beatings, r...

The World as Gaza: Necropolitics and the Calculus of Survival

  “ The ultimate expression of sovereignty resides in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die.” — Achille Mbembe, “Necropolitics” There are philosophies that dissect history, and there are philosophies that bleed through it. Achille Mbembe’s Necropolitics belongs to the latter — it is not an academic exercise, but a diagnosis of the world’s moral decay. In his words, modern sovereignty is no longer about governing life — it is about managing death . It decides who is allowed to breathe, who must suffocate, and who will exist in the space between. Nowhere is this calculus of death more visible, more technologically refined, and more ethically bankrupt than in Palestine . The siege of Gaza has transformed necropolitics from theory into geography — a place where the architecture of control and the arithmetic of survival intersect. The Right to Kill, the Duty to Let Die In Necropolitics , Mbembe extends Foucault’s biopower — the power to “...

How to Oppose Annexation Without Actually Opposing It: The Trump Doctrine of Elegant Hypocrisy

  The Art of Saying No While Handing Over the Keys: Trump’s De Facto Annexation Gift to Israel Ah yes — the era of “ principled diplomacy.” The Trump administration, that self-proclaimed guardian of “fairness” in the Middle East, will forever be remembered for its masterclass in political double-speak — a rare performance where the United States verbally opposed Israel’s annexation of the West Bank while physically laying down the red carpet for it. It’s like saying, “ Please, don’t steal the car,” while quietly tossing over the keys, disabling the alarm, and complimenting the thief’s driving skills. The Great Paradox — or Just the Great Performance? Let’s call it what it was: a paradox of diplomacy , or perhaps more accurately , a farce performed for global consumption . In words , the Trump administration urged restraint — telling Netanyahu that annexation should be “coordinated,” “negotiated,” and “timed wisely.” In reality , it was busy dismantling every legal and dip...

The Science of Fear: How Islamophobia Became a Campaign Strategy

  When Zohran Mamdani stood before a roaring crowd and declared, “ No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in Islamophobia and win an election,” he wasn’t just celebrating victory — he was delivering a eulogy for a long, poisonous political playbook. Because let’s face it — Islamophobia has never just been about prejudice. It’s been a strategy — polished, funded, and weaponized into one of the most successful vote-getting formulas in modern politics. The Machinery of Fear The arithmetic is simple — and sinister . Take a minority that makes up barely 2% of the U.S. population . Turn them into the symbolic threat for the other 98%. Feed that fear with millions of dollars , wrap it in the flag , and sell it as “security. ” According to a 2021 CAIR report , more than $105 million was funneled to just 26 anti-Muslim organizations between 2017 and 2019 — money laundered through “ mainstream charitable ” institutions. That’s not democracy in action. That’...

The Leak That Broke the Mirror: Israel’s Moral Collapse at Sde Teiman

  n R It was not the torture that shocked Israel. It was the fact that someone leaked it. Welcome to Sde Teiman — the desert detention camp that became a mirror to Israel’s moral decay, and to the world’s selective blindness. The Scene of the Crime The story begins, like most horror stories do these days, with a camera. On July 5, 2024, security footage inside the Sde Teiman military base caught what it was never meant to record: a Palestinian prisoner, blindfolded, bound, and dragged across the floor by Israeli soldiers. Moments later, the soldiers raised shields to block the camera — and behind that human wall, the real Israel revealed itself. When the shields dropped , the man lay broken: seven fractured ribs, a punctured lung, and a torn rectum so severe it required surgery and a colostomy. The anatomy of cruelty was complete. The Scandal That Wasn’t You would think such a crime would set off national outrage. But in Israel’s political universe , torture is an...