Skip to main content

When Violence Becomes the Language of the State Israel’s Internal Crisis and the Brutality Long Normalized in the West Bank

 



The image of prosecutor Salah Khalil Na’ameh’s battered face shocked many Israelis because it shattered a dangerous illusion: that state violence lmk can remain confined to Palestinians indefinitely without eventually consuming Israeli society itself.

For Palestinians, especially in the occupied West Bank, such scenes are tragically familiar.

A man beaten bloody by armed forces.
Masked officers storming homes.
Security forces accused of fabricating narratives later contradicted by video evidence.
Citizens pleading for protection while police either stand aside or participate.

What shocked many Israelis was not merely the brutality itself — but the identity of the victim. Na’ameh was not a villager from Hebron or a shepherd from Masafer Yatta. He was an Arab citizen of Israel. A state prosecutor. A man who worked within the Israeli legal system itself.

And even he allegedly found himself helpless before a police force critics increasingly describe as politicized, radicalized, and intoxicated with impunity.

Under the leadership of Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s police have become the center of growing domestic outrage. Protesters, academics, journalists, Arab citizens, anti-war activists, and even elderly Holocaust survivors now describe encounters with police in language once reserved for authoritarian regimes.

But the deeper story is not simply about police misconduct.

It is about what happens when a society spends decades normalizing domination, humiliation, and unchecked violence against another people.

The West Bank: A Laboratory of Impunity

For years, human rights groups, former Israeli officials, UN observers, and even some Israeli military commanders warned that violence in the occupied West Bank was spiraling out of control.

Palestinian communities have endured:

  • Armed settler raids
  • Arson attacks on homes and farms
  • Destruction of olive groves
  • Physical assaults on farmers and shepherds
  • Mosque vandalism
  • Shootings
  • Forced displacement campaigns

Much of this violence has occurred under the watch of Israeli soldiers and police.

The most infamous extremist networks are the so-called “Hilltop Youth” — radical settler groups that established illegal outposts across West Bank hilltops while embracing an ideology of territorial conquest and Palestinian intimidation.

The U.S. Treasury officially designated the Hilltop Youth as a violent extremist organization, accusing it of killings, arson, intimidation campaigns, and attacks designed to terrorize Palestinian civilians and drive them from their land.

These groups became notorious for so-called “price tag attacks”: burning homes, torching vehicles, uprooting olive trees, spray-painting racist slogans, and attacking entire villages in retaliation for any perceived obstacle to settlement expansion.

Critics increasingly argue that the problem is no longer isolated extremism.

It is institutional tolerance.

Violence Under Military Protection

Again and again, reports emerged describing settlers attacking Palestinian communities while Israeli soldiers either failed to intervene or actively protected the attackers.

From villages near Ramallah to shepherd communities in South Hebron, Palestinians describe a reality where armed settlers arrive first — and the military follows later, not to stop them, but to secure the aftermath.

Recent international reporting documented Palestinian families forced from burial grounds, villages torched, and farmers assaulted while settlers operated with near-total impunity.

Even Israeli military officials have acknowledged unequal enforcement.

Leaked remarks by Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth reportedly admitted that Palestinians accused of stone-throwing were routinely shot, while violent Jewish settlers committing similar acts were treated differently because of the “societal consequences” of enforcing the law equally.

Such admissions are devastating because they confirm what Palestinians have argued for decades: that there are effectively two legal systems operating in the same territory.

One punitive and lethal.
The other permissive and protective.

The Spillover Into Israeli Society

For years, analysts warned that violence normalized in the occupied territories would not remain geographically contained.

Occupation does not merely affect the occupied.

It reshapes the occupier.

The militarized mindset cultivated in the West Bank — where force becomes routine and accountability weakens — eventually migrates inward into police culture, politics, and civilian life.

Now many Israelis themselves are beginning to experience what Palestinians long described:

  • aggressive policing
  • arbitrary violence
  • suppression of dissent
  • extremist vigilantism
  • political intimidation

The assault on Salah Khalil Na’ameh has therefore become symbolic far beyond one case.

If a prosecutor representing the Israeli state can allegedly be beaten nearly to death in his own home while officers reportedly ignore his pleas, what protection remains for ordinary citizens?

The Rise of Lawlessness

Israel is simultaneously experiencing:

  • record homicide rates
  • rising gang violence
  • growing youth extremism
  • increasingly violent policing
  • politicization of law enforcement
  • vigilante settler militancy

The murder of Yemanu Binyamin Zelka by teenagers in Petah Tikvah horrified Israelis because it exposed another societal fracture: public violence occurring openly while authorities appeared slow or ineffective.

Meanwhile, critics accuse the government of focusing heavily on suppressing anti-war dissent while failing to address organized criminal violence or escalating settler extremism.

The pattern increasingly resembles a society losing faith in the neutrality of its own institutions.

A Warning Ignored

Palestinians warned for decades that a system built on permanent domination could not remain morally compartmentalized.

You cannot normalize military occupation for generations without transforming the psychology of the state itself.

You cannot allow mobs to terrorize villages while calling it “security” without weakening the meaning of law.

You cannot empower extremists politically and expect institutions to remain democratic indefinitely.

Even some veteran Israeli figures now openly fear this trajectory.

Former diplomat Colette Avital argued that the violence imposed on Palestinians is now seeping back into Israeli society itself, warning that Israel risks losing its democratic character entirely.

Her words carry particular weight because they come not from external critics, but from within Israel’s own establishment.

The Moral Reckoning

The tragedy unfolding inside Israel today is not disconnected from the West Bank.

It is connected intimately.

A culture of impunity cultivated under occupation has begun eroding the institutions supposedly designed to protect Israeli citizens themselves.

The same system that ignored Palestinian suffering for years is now generating fear among Israelis who once believed the violence would never reach them.

The photograph of Salah Khalil Na’ameh is therefore more than an image of police brutality.

It is a mirror.

And many Israelis are beginning to see, perhaps for the first time, the reflection of a system Palestinians have lived under for generations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

  There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Endurance War: When Pain Becomes Strategy

  There are wars fought with missiles. There are wars fought with money. And then there are wars like this one— where the real battlefield is human endurance , and the real weapon is pain tolerance . The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is being presented as a masterstroke by —a clean, calculated move to choke Iran’s economic lifeline. But beneath the polished language of “strategic pressure” lies a far simpler, far more uncomfortable truth: This is not a test of power. It is a test of who can suffer longer. And in that contest, Washington may have chosen the wrong opponent. The Fantasy of Economic Collapse The theory is elegant: Strangle oil exports Collapse revenue Trigger unrest Force surrender It is also, historically speaking, remarkably ineffective . A major study by RAND Corporation on coercive economic strategies concluded that: “ Economic sanctions alone rarely achieve major political objectives, particularly against regimes with strong internal sec...
Post a Comment
Read more

When a Constitution Becomes a Decorative Document America’s Latest War, and the Curious Death of Accountability

  There is an imperial comedy unfolding before the world — dark enough to be tragedy, absurd enough to be satire. This is, after all, the very “model democracy” United States  has spent decades promising to export to humanity — by missile, by occupation, by sanctions, by “shock and awe,” by solemn lectures on liberty delivered from polished podiums standing atop broken nations. This was the sermon preached to Iraq. Imposed on Afghanistan. Invoked amid the destruction of Libya . Entangled in the agony of Syria. Echoed through the devastation of Yemen.  The doctrine was always wrapped in noble language: Rule of law. Democratic institutions. Constitutional order. Checks and balances. How magnificent those words sound — right up until power decides they are optional at home. What a remarkable export product: A democracy where Congress yields, courts hesitate, executive power expands, wars begin first and legal arguments arrive later — wrapped in flags, marketed...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

  There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth. Not because conscience triumphs. Not because morality suddenly awakens. But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.” That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable: “ Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilize d the Middle East.” Read that again. Not they . We. Not Israel alone . We have been part of it. That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history. For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the Readers Move Ahead of the Columnist

  There is something quietly seismic happening—not in the corridors of power, not in carefully worded opinion columns, but in the comment sections beneath them. While attempts to diagnose where Israel “lost its way,” the readers seem to be asking a far more unsettling question: What if it didn’t lose its way at all? What if this is the way? For decades, the comforting narrative was simple: the problem was leadership. Replace , and the moral arc would gently correct itself. Peace would again become plausible. Restraint would return. The “real Israel” would re-emerge. But the readers are no longer convinced. They are pointing to something deeper—something less convenient. Not a deviation. A pattern. Not an exception. A structure. Because when policies persist across decades, across governments, across crises—at what point do we stop calling them mistakes and start calling them design? The Quiet Collapse of a Narrative One reader puts it bluntly: Palestinians have alr...
Post a Comment
Read more