"Advanced Democracies” or Advanced Excuses? Netanyahu’s Global Hit List as Policy.

“I do not rule out renewed strikes on terrorists in foreign countries. This is what advanced democracies do.” — Sounds noble, until one stops laughing (or cries).

Look, there’s something deeply unsettling in the polished logic of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s latest sermon to the world: terrorists deserve no sanctuary, so countries that host them must either cough them up or be targets themselves. Because when one wields power, there’s no higher law than “might makes right.”

What he calls “what advanced democracies do,” let’s unpack that. Democracy, in many people’s hearts, promises justice, due process, limits on power—not a carte blanche for extraterritorial strikes. Yet here we have an argument that sovereignty should yield not to diplomacy, not to negotiation, but to the drone-strike, the missile, the secretive kill-mission conducted beyond public scrutiny. Because that, apparently, is the hallmark of maturity: to threaten and act across borders whenever, wherever.

The recent strike in Doha, Qatar, is the poster child of this philosophy: Hamas leaders allegedly there; mediation in motion; ceasefire on the table—but also, apparently, a kill list upstairs somewhere. Five Hamas members dead, a Qatari guard dead, negotiations either derailed or weakened, outrage erupting. Sovereignty trampled. Trust evaporated. Yet Netanyahu proclaims: this is statecraft. Advanced democracy.

And what of the alternative? Qatar’s protests that this was a violation of international law, “state terror,” a betrayal of mediation. Yeah, but—they’re the ones who hosted the so-bad ones, right? So why be upset when Israel takes “justice” into its own hands?

Let’s also talk about consistency. When the U.S. hunted down bin Laden, there was fallout, yes—but there was also a narrative: the 9/11 trauma, the moral panic, sympathetic audiences. Here, it's a different neighborhood, a different massacre (October 7), but the logic somehow must be accepted without question. When Netanyahu says “wherever they hide,” the thought unspoken is: wherever we decide to shoot first, ask questions later.

Here’s the cruel arithmetic not on his podium: mis-targets, civilian suffering, destroyed lives—not just of “terrorists,” but innocents caught in the radius of your bombs. The diplomatic cost, the regional hatred, the undermining of rule of law—it adds up. But “advanced democracy” does risk these things, perhaps. Just with more PR polish.

This is the real question we have to demand answers to, not more speeches: What standard of evidence? What accountability? Who defines the “terrorist” so that the rest of us—millions of people—don’t disappear into their list?

Because in the name of “doing what advanced democracies do,” one might end up claiming moral high ground while stomping over every principle that makes democracy—not dictatorship—bearable.

So yes: strike. Hunt. Pursue. But if you’re going to call yourself “advanced,” make sure you also carry the weight of restraint, transparency, law, and the humanity that doesn’t check out when bombs drop.

Comments

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog