Gaza: Everybody is Mediating, Nothing is Happening.

August 18, 2025 — Guest column by Yossi Alpher

Welcome to the Gaza “peace process,” that never-ending circus where everybody’s a mediator and nobody’s making progress. Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, the U.S. — all ladling soup into a pot that’s already boiling over. And yet, somehow, dinner is never served.

🎭 Another Offensive, Because Why Not?

Israel’s brilliant plan? Another Gaza offensive. Scheduled for October, as if wars now come with calendar reminders. Supposedly this is “leverage” to make Hamas flexible.

Problem: the IDF has spent two years proving it doesn’t understand Hamas at all. Chief of Staff Zamir actually admits as much. He’d rather talk than march, which makes him sound more rational than half the government — a dangerous quality in today’s Israel.

Meanwhile, protesters fill the streets screaming what should be obvious: the war is spent, the hostages are dying, and Israel looks like the villain in a bad historical remake.

🍲 Too Many Cooks, Zero Soup

Let’s count: four mediators, two peace formulas, and still nothing. Why? Because messianic fanatics are running the show on both sides.

Hamas can’t imagine coexistence — their brand depends on permanent war.
Netanyahu’s babysitters, Smotrich and Ben Gvir, dream of biblical conquest and happily write off the hostages.

So Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, and Washington keep setting the mediation table, while the diners throw the food on the floor.

🪖 Draft Dodgers and Desertion

Inside Israel, the war machine is sputtering.

50,000 Haredi draft dodgers still exempt, still untouchable, still praying while others bleed.
Reservists are quitting, after spending hundreds of days away from families and jobs.

But sure, let’s launch another Gaza offensive. Because nothing says “unity” like a war nobody wants to fight.

📍 Lebanon? Syria? No Problem. Gaza? Impossible.

Israel somehow neutralizes Hezbollah in Lebanon. It even finds a modus vivendi with Syria’s Islamist regime. But Gaza? A black hole that swallows every strategy.

Israel has no plan for Gaza.
Palestinians have no functioning leadership for peace.

So we’re left with stopgap gimmicks: Egypt training 5,000 Palestinian policemen, and a West Bank businessman, Samir Hulileh, being auditioned as “Governor of Gaza.” Whether Hamas or Netanyahu ever sign off? Don’t hold your breath.

✈️ Forced Migration, the “New Idea” That’s Older Than Dirt

Here’s the latest brainstorm: move Gazans out. Where? South Sudan, Somalia, Somaliland, Indonesia — basically, wherever desperation can be bribed.

Trump sees beachfront real estate begging for luxury resorts.
Netanyahu’s messianists see divine destiny: Gaza without Arabs.
Egypt sees a demographic nightmare spilling toward Cairo.
Turkey & Qatar see a chance to keep Hamas alive.

Of course, forced transfer is immoral, illegal, and catastrophic. But since when has that stopped anyone?

🗳️ Netanyahu’s Real War: Against Elections

Behind all the noise, here’s the real plot twist: Netanyahu doesn’t want peace or victory. He wants time.

Elections are due within a year.
His coalition is wobbling, especially over the Haredi draft crisis.
Gaza, in his hands, becomes a political delaying tactic. Another offensive? Another negotiation round? Doesn’t matter — as long as it pushes elections further down the road.

🧩 The Gaza Puzzle That Nobody Wants to Solve

So, Gaza is many things, depending on who you ask:

For Hamas: permanent resistance.
For Netanyahu’s allies: the Promised Land minus Arabs.
For Trump: a seaside investment portfolio.
For Egypt: a demographic threat.
For Turkey & Qatar: a Muslim Brotherhood sanctuary.
For ordinary Gazans: just war, starvation, and exile.

Everybody is mediating. Nothing is happening. Because, in truth, nobody actually wants it to.

Comments

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog