Skip to main content

⚖️ The EU on Trial: A Historic Reckoning for Complicity in Gaza’s Genocide

 





By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com
🗓️ July 29, 2025


For the first time in the European Union’s history, its own institutions now stand accused—not by political activists or journalists, but by a coalition of seasoned international lawyers—of complicity in genocide.

Yes, you read that right. The European Commission and Council, long cloaked in diplomatic polish and bureaucratic ambiguity, are now the defendants in a legal action filed before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Their alleged crime? Silence, inaction, and ongoing cooperation with a regime accused of exterminating the people of Gaza.

This isn't just a legal case. It’s a moral trial of Europe’s soul.


🔥 From Never Again to Again and Again

Europe, the continent that birthed the Genocide Convention after the horrors of the Holocaust, now faces the haunting question: What is the value of international law when it is applied selectivelywhen the victims are not white, not Western, not geopolitically useful?

While Israeli bombs flattened homes, schools, hospitals, and UN shelters; while starvation was weaponized through aid blockades; while children were executed in their mothers' arms and journalists buried under rubblethe EU responded not with sanctions, but with applause.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen even flew to Tel Aviv in October 2023 to declare unwavering support for “Israel’s right to defend itself—days into the mass killing of civilians, before the first war crimes were even documented.


📜 The Legal Grounds: A Case of Cowardice

The lawsuit—filed by the Association of Jurists for the Respect of International Law (JURDI)—accuses the EU of failing to fulfill its legal obligations under:

  • The Genocide Convention (1948), which demands not just punishment after genocide, but prevention before it happens;
  • EU law, which prohibits arms exports where there is a “clear risk” of misuse in crimes against humanity;
  • And Article 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, which holds EU institutions accountable when they fail to act where they are legally required to.

Let us be clear: The EU has not just failed to act. It has continued to finance, arm, and legitimize the very machinery accused of perpetrating genocide.


🧩 A Pattern of Complicity

  • German Leopard tanks, French surveillance tech, and Italian drone parts have all reportedly found their way to the occupation battlefield.
  • The EU–Israel Association Agreement, which facilitates trade and research cooperation, remains intact—despite being contingent on “respect for human rights.”
  • At the United Nations, EU states either voted against or abstained on calls for ceasefire and accountability, while watching Gaza be turned into a graveyard.

And when the International Court of Justice issued provisional measures in January 2024 to prevent genocide in Gaza, the EU did nothing to enforce or support them.


🕊️ Justice or Just Apologies?

Europe loves to remember genocide. Museums. Memorials. Marches. “Never again” is etched into the walls of parliaments and plazas. But what happens when the very mechanisms built to prevent such horrors are ignored for political convenience?

This case will test not only the legality of EU actions—but the legitimacy of European human rights rhetoric.

If the EU Commission and Council are found to have violated their legal duty to act in the face of genocide, it will mark a seismic shift. It will say, unequivocally: international law is not a trophy for victors—it is a mirror for all.


🧱 Will the Wall Crack?

This case isn’t just symbolic—it’s strategic. It exposes the EU’s institutional cowardice and ethical collapse. It demands more than statements. It demands consequences:

  • Suspend all cooperation agreements with Israel until full compliance with international law.
  • Impose targeted sanctions on Israeli officials and settler entities responsible for mass atrocities.
  • Support full investigations by the ICC and ICJ, without political interference.

Anything less is not diplomacy. It is collusion.


✍️ A Final Word

The children of Gaza don’t need Europe’s tears. They needed its action—months ago.

As the EU’s top bodies stand trial in Luxembourg, let this not be seen merely as a legal moment. Let it be remembered as a moral reckoning—a point in history where the high priests of human rights were forced to answer for their silence.

Justice delayed is injustice compounded.

Let Europe now choose: history’s witness or history’s accomplice?


🔗 Read more at: ainnbeen.blogspot.com
#GazaGenocide #EUComplicity #InternationalLaw #HumanRights #JusticeForPalestine #NeverAgainIsNow

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...