Skip to main content

The Price of Their Silence: How Islamophobia Became an Industry—and Muslims Its Global Collateral

 


🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 28, 2025


They bombed Iraq for democracy.
Tortured Afghans in the name of security.
Waterboarded bodies at Guantanamo and called it “enhanced interrogation.”
And now in Gaza—they bury children under rubble and whisper, self-defense.

This isn’t a war on terror. It’s a war on memory, on names, on brown bodies that pray in Arabic. And Islamophobia has been its golden engine—powerful, profitable, and protected.


🧠 Islamophobia: Not Just Prejudice—A $Billions Industry

Islamophobia is not just a bias—it’s a well-funded psychological operation. According to the Center for American Progress, over $42 million was channeled (2001–2011) into think tanks and media fronts to craft and normalize anti-Muslim sentiment. This isn’t random—it’s strategic.

The goal: keep the public afraid—of Muslims, of mosques, of immigrants, of something called Sharia Law.


📘 Sharia Law: The Manufactured Threat That Never Was

Let’s be clear: Sharia Law is not creeping into America. No U.S. court has ever enforced it, and no Muslim group is lobbying to replace the Constitution. Yet the myth of Sharia as a threat has become one of the most repeated—and weaponized—lies in Western politics.

Between 2010 and 2020, over 200 anti-Sharia bills were introduced in U.S. state legislatures—none based on any actual case of Sharia being imposed.

What’s more, this myth has created an entire sub-industry:

  • Books with titles like Shariah: The Threat to America.
  • Reports by well-funded organizations like:
    • The Center for Security Policy
    • ACT for America
    • Middle East Forum

These organizations, often led by former military or intelligence officials, push the absurd claim that Muslims are secretly plotting to replace democracy with Islamic law. This fearmongering has poisoned local town hall meetings, political campaigns, school boards, and police departments.

✍️ It’s not about law—it’s about control through fear. Sharia is just a stand-in for “Muslim threat.”

Meanwhile, those who actually live under siege—like Palestinians in Gaza or Iraqis who lost entire cities to war—are told they are a danger to the Western world.


💸 Donors: The Hidden Architects of Hatred

Behind these campaigns are elite donors who finance hate through back channels of philanthropy:

  • Donors Capital Fund
  • Richard Mellon Scaife Foundation
  • Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation

They fund research, political ads, lobbying, and books that make Islamophobia sound intellectual. And the kicker? These same donors get tax benefits for “supporting education.”

They built an empire that profits from paranoia—and Muslims pay the price.


📸 From Abu Ghraib to Gaza: The Continuum of Dehumanization

Whether it was naked prisoners in Abu Ghraib, innocents at Bagram, or civilians in Fallujah, Muslim bodies have long been targets of Western impunity. And today in Gaza, we witness the horrific continuation:

  • Over 60,000 killed (2023–2025), the majority women and children.
  • Hospitals bombed. Aid workers assassinated. Journalists targeted.
  • Entire families vaporized—and yet, the world’s moral institutions blink slowly, if at all.

Why? Because Islamophobia numbs the global conscience. Palestinians are cast as a security threat before they are even seen as human.


🔍 Case Study: Christchurch and the “Lone Wolf” Myth

When Brenton Tarrant massacred 51 Muslims in Christchurch mosques in 2019, he was portrayed as an isolated extremist. Despite referencing international white supremacist networks, the media called him a “lone wolf.” There was no global investigation. No coalition war on white extremism.

Meanwhile, Muslims suspected of far less are subject to drone assassinations, black sites, and indefinite detention.

The war on terror wasn’t about terrorism. It was about who gets to be afraid—and who gets to be destroyed.


Conclusion: This Isn’t Just Silence—It’s a Mass Grave

From the halls of Congress to corporate newsrooms, from courtroom benches to college campuses, Islamophobia operates like software—running silently in the background, managing every narrative, killing every outcry.

This silence justifies:

  • $3.8 billion/year in U.S. military aid to Israel.
  • Drone strikes across Muslim-majority countries.
  • The starvation of Gaza.
  • The erasure of history, accountability, and truth.

And while Muslims pray for justice, the world changes the channel.


🖋️ History will ask: What did you do when Gaza screamed?”
And too many will answer: We feared Sharia.”


Written by Malik Mukhtar
📌 ainnbeen.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...