Skip to main content

Guns, God, and Grabbed Land: How Ben Gvir Armed the Apocalypse in the West Bank

 


🕯️

📍By Malik Mukhtar | ainnbeen.blogspot.com
🗓️ June 29, 2025


They’re not soldiers.
They’re not police.
But they carry rifles, wear flak jackets, and bur
n villages—under a government badge.

This is not fiction.
This is not wartime Gaza.
This is the West Bank in 2025—where settlers have become a state-backed militia, and Palestinians are being pushed off their ancestral land at gunpoint.


🔥 A State-Sanctioned Militia Disguised as “Self-Defense”

Under the directive of Israel’s far-right National Security Minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, more than 9,000 semi-automatic rifles, assault weapons, and tactical gear have been distributed to Jewish settlers across the occupied West Bank since October 2023.

Let that sink in.
Nine thousand rifles.
To civilians.
Settlers.
Vigilantes.

In a region under military occupation, this is not security—it’s a blueprint for ethnic cleansing.

Ben Gvir calls them Civilian Security Squads.”
But these are not “squads.” These are armed cells, spread across more than 400 illegal settlements and outposts, armed and emboldened by state policy.


🧷 What Are They Armed With?

According to Israeli press (Haaretz, +972 Mag) and verified reports:

  • M16 and M4 assault rifles
  • Semi-automatic Ruger rifles
  • Beretta and Glock handguns
  • Body armor, helmets, radios, drones
  • Tactical gear supplied by Ben Gvir’s ministry and settler-aligned NGOs

And yes—all with state approval.


⚠️ The Numbers That Haunt

  • Over 950 “civil defense squads have been formally established or reactivated.
  • More than 6,000 settlers were fast-tracked for gun licenses in just 6 months.
  • The majority of weapons went to settlers in flashpoint areas: Huwara, Hebron Hills, Nablus, and Silwad, among others.
  • Some units were even trained by former IDF commandos.

This is not law and order.
This is a civilian militia, tailored for one purpose:
Intimidate. Expel. Replace.


🏚️ The Aftermath: Villages Burn, Families Flee

Since early 2024, more than 16 Palestinian communities in Area C have been completely emptied due to settler violence and threats.

Entire hamlets—Ras al-Tin, Ein Samiya, Wadi al-Siq—have been erased from the land without a single tank rolling in.
Just settlers.
Guns.
And silence.

In some cases, settlers opened fire while IDF troops looked on—or stood beside them.
Ben Gvir defended it all: “They’re protecting Jewish lives.

But who protects the Palestinian child shot in the chest while grazing sheep?
Who shelters the grandmother whose house was burned while soldiers laughed?


🗺️ A Map Redrawn in Blood

This is not random violence.
It is a system.
Backed by laws.
Fueled by racism.
Executed with state-issued rifles.

Palestinians are not just being oppressed.
They are being erased—village by village, tree by tree, name by name.


✊🏽 Resistance Isn’t Terrorism—It’s Survival

If your home was torched…
If your child was hunted by men with M16s on stolen hills…
If your very existence was a target…

Would you not resist?

Let it be clear:
This is not a “conflict.”
This is settler colonialism, militarized by a fanatical ideology and funded with impunity.


🕯️ A Final Word

The world’s gaze may be fixed on Gaza, but the West Bank is bleeding quietly, methodically—beneath a fog of bureaucracy, barbed wire, and Ben Gvir’s rifles.

In the words of one displaced father from Ein Samiya:

“They didn’t come with tanks. They came with paper, guns, and smiles. And they told us to leave—or die.”

This isn’t security.
This isn’t defense.
This is a war on existence—and the weapons are already in their hands.


📢 Read. Share. Resist. Silence is complicity.
✍️ Malik Mukhtar
🔗 ainnbeen.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...