Skip to main content

💔 One Eye for Gaza: Hannah Thomas and the Price of Speaking Truth



🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 29, 2025


She stood on the pavement—Hannah Thomas, lawyer, activist, former Greens candidate.
She stood—holding no weapon, only a banner and a conscience.
She stood—outside a factory that allegedly helps plate the steel for F-35 jets now raining hell on Gaza.
And for that—Australian police slammed her to the ground.
Now, she may never see from her right eye again.

Let that sentence burn into your mind:
“She may lose her sight—for standing against genocide.”


🇵🇸 In Gaza, Eyes Are Lost Forever

In Gaza, there are no surgeons left for eyes.
Eyes are buried beneath concrete. Eyes were starved shut. Eyes were blinded by phosphorus, smoke, dust. Children in Gaza have forgotten what it means to look up without fear. And still, the bombs fall.

From October 7, 2023 to now, tens of thousands dead—many torn apart by American-made weapons, polished and prepped by foreign contractors. The livestream genocide has not stopped. The world's silence has not cracked.

And those who dare raise a voice? Their silence is forced.


🇦🇺 Australia’s Iron Fist

On June 27, 2025, a peaceful protest erupted in Belmore, Sydney. Dozens of Australians gathered outside SEC Plating, a company accused of helping arm Israel’s war machine. The protest was vocal, but peaceful.

NSW Police ordered them to disperse. Under Section 197 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, police in New South Wales may issue a “move-on order” if they believe someone’s presence is obstructive or causing harassment. The bar is dangerously low. Vague terms like public safety or obstruction are invoked.

When Thomas refused to abandon her post—because Gaza cannot abandon its dead—police used force. Brutal, disproportionate force.

Photos show her bloodied face. The right side collapsed in purple-black swelling. Her eye sealed shut by trauma.
Doctors now say she may permanently lose sight in that eye.

What is the price of dissent in a democracy?
Apparently, vision.


⚖️ The Law, Weaponized

This isn’t about just one protest.
This is part of a wider crackdown—on voices for Palestine, on conscience, on protest itself.

Under NSW law, the Summary Offences Act and LEPRA (Law Enforcement Powers and Responsibilities Act) allow for charges like:

  • Unlawful assembly
  • Failing to comply with police directions
  • Obstructing traffic

All vague. All subjective. All ripe for abuse.

And what of justice for Hannah?
No officer has been suspended. No investigation deemed “critical.” She was arrested—but not charged—as if to wound her, and walk away clean.


🟢 Green Voices, Bloodied Faces

Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi said:

“This is brutal. This is unjust. There must be an investigation.”

Senator David Shoebridge echoed:

“Police violence cannot be swept under the rug. Peaceful protest is not a crime.”

Yet even as Greens leaders demand justice, the NSW Acting Police Minister refuses to classify this as a “critical incident.”
Apparently, near-blinding a woman in broad daylight isn’t serious enough.


🌐 Human Rights Are Not Selective

Where are the global watchdogs?
Where is the outrage from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the UN Human Rights Council?

They know this:

  • That Australia's suppression mirrors what is happening globally—
  • That pro-Palestinian advocacy is being criminalized across “liberal democracies”
  • That to speak out for Gaza is now seen as a threat to the status quo.

This is not democracy. This is manufactured consent enforced with batons.


🔥 One Eye Shut. Millions Turned Away.

Hannah Thomas is one person.
But she stood for millions.

She stood while others scrolled past death.
She stood while children in Gaza cried out.
She stood where governments refused to.

And now she may never see from her right eye again.
But we must see.
We must look harder. Deeper. More defiantly.
Because Gaza’s livestream genocide will not stop with bombs. It continues in silence. In cracked skulls. In blinded eyes. In shattered voices.


✊🏽 Call to Action

If you still have your voice, use it.
If you still have your eyes, open them.
If you still have your freedom, defend those who don’t.

Because today, it was Hannah.
Tomorrow, it could be you.

📎 Link to full coverage and updates at bottom of article.

🔗 ainnbeen.blogspot.com


Comments

Anonymous said…
I am horrified that Australia is directly comicit in this atrocity...and no longer surprised by our so called law enforcement officer's violence. We read about it on almost a daily basis. And what has happened Ed to Hannah is despicable. Where is our Albanese's voice and action to hold the cops responsible? Where is his protection of the right to protest peacefully?
Malik said…
Thank you for your powerful and heartfelt response.

You're absolutely right to be horrified. Australia's complicity—through silence, diplomatic cover, and suppression of peaceful dissent—raises deeply troubling questions about our national conscience. The treatment of Hannah is not just despicable; it's symptomatic of a growing intolerance toward protest and a dangerous erosion of civil liberties in so-called liberal democracies.

As you pointed out, law enforcement violence is no longer an anomaly but a pattern. And yet, the absence of leadership—from Prime Minister Albanese in particular—is deafening. When the state fails to defend the fundamental right to protest peacefully, it signals not neutrality, but complicity.

Your voice—and the voices of others who refuse to turn away—are critical in this moment. Thank you for standing up, for speaking out, and for holding power to account.

Warm regards,
Malik Mukhtar
✍️ www.ainnbeen.blogspot.com



Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...