Skip to main content

💔 One Eye for Gaza: Hannah Thomas and the Price of Speaking Truth



🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar
📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 29, 2025


She stood on the pavement—Hannah Thomas, lawyer, activist, former Greens candidate.
She stood—holding no weapon, only a banner and a conscience.
She stood—outside a factory that allegedly helps plate the steel for F-35 jets now raining hell on Gaza.
And for that—Australian police slammed her to the ground.
Now, she may never see from her right eye again.

Let that sentence burn into your mind:
“She may lose her sight—for standing against genocide.”


🇵🇸 In Gaza, Eyes Are Lost Forever

In Gaza, there are no surgeons left for eyes.
Eyes are buried beneath concrete. Eyes were starved shut. Eyes were blinded by phosphorus, smoke, dust. Children in Gaza have forgotten what it means to look up without fear. And still, the bombs fall.

From October 7, 2023 to now, tens of thousands dead—many torn apart by American-made weapons, polished and prepped by foreign contractors. The livestream genocide has not stopped. The world's silence has not cracked.

And those who dare raise a voice? Their silence is forced.


🇦🇺 Australia’s Iron Fist

On June 27, 2025, a peaceful protest erupted in Belmore, Sydney. Dozens of Australians gathered outside SEC Plating, a company accused of helping arm Israel’s war machine. The protest was vocal, but peaceful.

NSW Police ordered them to disperse. Under Section 197 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, police in New South Wales may issue a “move-on order” if they believe someone’s presence is obstructive or causing harassment. The bar is dangerously low. Vague terms like public safety or obstruction are invoked.

When Thomas refused to abandon her post—because Gaza cannot abandon its dead—police used force. Brutal, disproportionate force.

Photos show her bloodied face. The right side collapsed in purple-black swelling. Her eye sealed shut by trauma.
Doctors now say she may permanently lose sight in that eye.

What is the price of dissent in a democracy?
Apparently, vision.


⚖️ The Law, Weaponized

This isn’t about just one protest.
This is part of a wider crackdown—on voices for Palestine, on conscience, on protest itself.

Under NSW law, the Summary Offences Act and LEPRA (Law Enforcement Powers and Responsibilities Act) allow for charges like:

  • Unlawful assembly
  • Failing to comply with police directions
  • Obstructing traffic

All vague. All subjective. All ripe for abuse.

And what of justice for Hannah?
No officer has been suspended. No investigation deemed “critical.” She was arrested—but not charged—as if to wound her, and walk away clean.


🟢 Green Voices, Bloodied Faces

Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi said:

“This is brutal. This is unjust. There must be an investigation.”

Senator David Shoebridge echoed:

“Police violence cannot be swept under the rug. Peaceful protest is not a crime.”

Yet even as Greens leaders demand justice, the NSW Acting Police Minister refuses to classify this as a “critical incident.”
Apparently, near-blinding a woman in broad daylight isn’t serious enough.


🌐 Human Rights Are Not Selective

Where are the global watchdogs?
Where is the outrage from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the UN Human Rights Council?

They know this:

  • That Australia's suppression mirrors what is happening globally—
  • That pro-Palestinian advocacy is being criminalized across “liberal democracies”
  • That to speak out for Gaza is now seen as a threat to the status quo.

This is not democracy. This is manufactured consent enforced with batons.


🔥 One Eye Shut. Millions Turned Away.

Hannah Thomas is one person.
But she stood for millions.

She stood while others scrolled past death.
She stood while children in Gaza cried out.
She stood where governments refused to.

And now she may never see from her right eye again.
But we must see.
We must look harder. Deeper. More defiantly.
Because Gaza’s livestream genocide will not stop with bombs. It continues in silence. In cracked skulls. In blinded eyes. In shattered voices.


✊🏽 Call to Action

If you still have your voice, use it.
If you still have your eyes, open them.
If you still have your freedom, defend those who don’t.

Because today, it was Hannah.
Tomorrow, it could be you.

📎 Link to full coverage and updates at bottom of article.

🔗 ainnbeen.blogspot.com


Comments

Anonymous said…
I am horrified that Australia is directly comicit in this atrocity...and no longer surprised by our so called law enforcement officer's violence. We read about it on almost a daily basis. And what has happened Ed to Hannah is despicable. Where is our Albanese's voice and action to hold the cops responsible? Where is his protection of the right to protest peacefully?
Malik said…
Thank you for your powerful and heartfelt response.

You're absolutely right to be horrified. Australia's complicity—through silence, diplomatic cover, and suppression of peaceful dissent—raises deeply troubling questions about our national conscience. The treatment of Hannah is not just despicable; it's symptomatic of a growing intolerance toward protest and a dangerous erosion of civil liberties in so-called liberal democracies.

As you pointed out, law enforcement violence is no longer an anomaly but a pattern. And yet, the absence of leadership—from Prime Minister Albanese in particular—is deafening. When the state fails to defend the fundamental right to protest peacefully, it signals not neutrality, but complicity.

Your voice—and the voices of others who refuse to turn away—are critical in this moment. Thank you for standing up, for speaking out, and for holding power to account.

Warm regards,
Malik Mukhtar
✍️ www.ainnbeen.blogspot.com



Popular posts from this blog

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...