Skip to main content

Accepting Hamas’ Survival is Only Path Forward for Gaza. Gideon Levy. Key Points

 


Detailed overview of Gideon Levy's latest article on Gaza and Palestine. 

---

Article Title: "Accepting Hamas’ Survival is Only Path Forward for Gaza"

Published: March 14, 2025, in Haaretz (republished in The Palestine Chronicle) .  

---

Key Arguments & Overview 

1. Hamas Cannot Be Eliminated Militarily 

- Levy argues that despite 17 months of brutal war, Israel has failed to destroy Hamas.  

- Casualties & Destruction: Over tens of thousands of Gazans killed, yet Hamas remains politically entrenched.  

- Quote: 

  > "After the deaths of hundreds of Israeli soldiers and tens of thousands of Gazans, Hamas remains. After destruction on the scale of Dresden, Hamas remains." .  

2. Political Reality: Hamas is Gaza’s Only Governing Force 

- Levy dismisses proposals to replace Hamas with the Palestinian Authority (PA) or an international administration as unrealistic.  

- Key Point: 

  > "The king of Gaza will be from Hamas, or anointed with its consent.".  

- Hamas, though militarily weakened, has gained political strength by recentering the Palestinian cause globally.

3. Critique of Israel’s Failed Strategy 

- Israel’s reliance on "barbaric force" has only deepened Hamas’ legitimacy.

- Historical Failure: Israel’s 2005 Gaza disengagement lacked a long-term political vision, leading to today’s crisis.  

4. Call for Direct Negotiations with Hamas

- Levy urges Israel and the U.S. to accept Hamas as a political actor and engage in talks.  

- Controversial Stance:

  > "We need to talk to the organization. Even, or in fact especially, after October 7."  

5. Rejection of Alternative "Day After" Plans

- Levy critiques proposals like Trump’s "Riviera Plan" (mass displacement of Gazans) as fantastical and immoral.  

- Reality Check: 

  > "There is no day after Hamas and presumably there won’t be one anytime soon.".  

---

Broader Implications

- Military Futility: Prolonged war only strengthens Hamasideological appeal.  

- Political Stalemate: Without Hamas’ inclusion, no governance model for Gaza is viable.  

- International Law: Levy condemns Israel’s starvation tactics and collective punishment as violations .  

---

Related Context from Other Recent Levy Interviews 

1. On Ceasefire Violations (March 2025): 

   - Israel halted Phase 2 of the ceasefire, blocking aid and hostage releases .  

2. On the "Two-State Solution":

   - Levy declares it dead, citing 700,000+ settlers making partition impossible .  

3. On Media Bias: 

   - Israeli media erases Palestinian suffering, focusing only on soldiers and hostages .  

---

Conclusion  

Levy’s article is a scathing indictment of Israel’s Gaza policy, asserting that military solutions have failed and diplomatic engagement with Hamas is unavoidable  His stance challenges mainstream Israeli and Western narratives, calling for a radical shift in strategy.  


For the full article, see: [The Palestine Chronicle](https://www.palestinechronicle.com/accepting-hamas-survival-is-only-path-forward-for-gaza-gideon-levy/) .  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

  By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...