Skip to main content

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

 



There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth.

Not because conscience triumphs.
Not because morality suddenly awakens.
But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.”

That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable:

Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilized the Middle East.”

Read that again.

Not they.
We.

Not Israel alone.
We have been part of it.



That single phrase — “we have been part of it”may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history.

For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as “self-defense,” and marketed devastation as strategic necessity.

Now, from inside that same establishment, comes a confession:

We were part of it.

And yet — here is where moral clarity is strangled by imperial reflex — Sherman follows this extraordinary admission with another declaration:

“It is critical that Israel remains an ally of the U.S., and we protect the right of a Jewish state.”

And there it is.

The confession.
The caveat.
The bloodstain
followed immediately by a signature on the next weapons package.



Washington’s foreign policy, condensed into one breathtaking contradiction:

Yes, we helped create what is, in essence, genocide
…and yes, we must continue supporting it.

Imagine applying this logic anywhere else:

We acknowledge mass atrocity — therefore continued military support is essential.

It is a sentence so morally inverted it feels like satire.

But it is not satire.

It is doctrine.




Sherman tries, as seasoned diplomats do, to soften the legal edge:

“I can’t make the legal analysis about whether it is literally a genocide, but there is no doubt that Gaza was demolished.”

This is the language of carefully managed honesty.

Not denying horror.
Not embracing legal responsibility.
Naming catastrophe — while stepping delicately around culpability.

Diplomatic truth often speaks in whispers when screams are warranted.

Yet even in caution, her words are devastating:

“There is no doubt that Gaza was demolished.”

Demolished.

An entire society reduced to rubble, grief, starvation, amputated childhoods, mass graves, broken hospitals, orphaned generations, and cities turned into archaeological ruins of the present.

And the world’s greatest democracy debates terminology.




Sherman also offered another quiet indictment:

Democrats and Republicans “have not dealt with the Middle East in a way that’s helped create stability and peace.”

That is diplomatic language for:

We have spent decades setting fires and calling ourselves firefighters.

Iraq.
Libya.
Syria.
Yemen.
Afghanistan.
And now Gaza —
where America’s bombs, diplomacy, and veto power have become inseparable from the destruction itself.

What extraordinary political theater this is:

First fund catastrophe.
Then lament catastrophe.
Then explain why funding catastrophe must continue.

A moral ouroboros — empire swallowing its own conscience.


The deepest irony is not Sherman’s admission.

It is that truth is finally being spoken only after Gaza has been flattened.

Only after hunger became policy.
Only after children became statistics.
Only after humanitarian law became optional.
Only after the unbearable became routine.

Now establishment voices begin whispering what millions have shouted for years.

Too late for the dead.
Too late for the buried.
Too late for the children whose names will never be spoken in press briefings.


History may remember this moment not as awakening — but as confession without consequence.

An empire looked at devastation.

Called it devastation.

Admitted complicity.

And chose continuity.

That is not tragedy alone.

That is civilizational hypocrisy in its purest modern form.

And perhaps the most chilling line is still the smallest:

“We have been part of it.”

Three words.

A confession.

An indictment.

And unless policy changes — a promise of repetition.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overview of the threat to the banking industry, with examples from recent bank collapses and persistent future risks:

1. Increasing cyber-attacks targeting financial data:  Cyber-attacks like the 2017 Equifax breach (a) expose sensitive financial data, leading to significant financial and reputational damage. 2. Rising competition from fintech and non-traditional financial institutions: Companies like PayPal and Square are disrupting traditional banking by offering innovative financial services. (b) 3. Regulatory changes impacting operations and profitability: The Dodd-Frank Act imposed stricter regulations on banks, affecting their operations and profitability. (c) 4. Economic downturns affecting loan repayment and default rates: The 2008 financial crisis saw a spike in loan defaults, leading to the collapse of major banks like Lehman Brothers. 5. Interest rate volatility impacting margins: Rising interest rates in 2023 led to significant losses in banks' securities portfolios, contributing to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank². 6. Technological disruptions in payment systems and banking te...

Anatomy of a Moral Collapse A Critical Appraisal of Malik Mukhtar’s Five-Book Series

There are books that inform. There are books that persuade. And then there are books that accuse. Malik Mukhtar’s Anatomy of Moral Collapse series does not ask for your agreement—it puts you on trial. Across five tightly interwoven volumes, Mukhtar attempts something unusually ambitious: not merely to document the catastrophe in Gaza , but to construct a broader theory of how modern systems—political, humanitarian, digital, and psychological — have converged to normalize human suffering . This is not conventional analysis. It is a moral autopsy of our time. And like any autopsy, it is unsettling. A Theory of Collapse, Not Just a Chronicle of War What distinguishes this series is its refusal to remain confined to events. Mukhtar is not just describing what is happening—he is asking why it has become acceptable . The central argument unfolds with relentless clarity: modern systems no longer fail to prevent suffering—they produce, manage, and normalize it . Institutions meant t...

Man does not stand alone by A Cressy Marrison

The American scientist, A Cressy Morrison, Head of the Science Academy   in New York, says in his book "Man Does Not Stand Alone": Birds have the homing instinct. The robin that nested at your door may go south in the autumn, but will come back to his old nest the next spring. In September, flocks of many of our birds fly south,often over a thousand miles of open sea, but they do not lose their way. The homing pigeon, confused by new sounds on a long journey in a closed box, circles for a moment then heads almost unerringly for home. The bee finds its hive while the wind waving the grasses and trees blots out every visible guide to its whereabouts. This homing sense is slightly developed in man, but he supplements his meagre equipment with instruments of navigation.  We need this instinct and our brain provides the answer. The tiny insects must have microscopic eyes, how perfect we do not know, and the hawks, the eagle and the condor must have telescopic vision. Here...

Zionism and Post-Holocaust Christian Theology: A Jewish Perspective. Mark Braverman

     Introduction of Mark Braverman: Mark Braverman is a Jewish-American psychologist, theologian , and prominent voice in the interfaith justice movement for Palestine . Raised in a strong Zionist tradition , Braverman underwent a personal and moral transformation after witnessing the realities of the Israeli occupation . He is the Executive Director of Kairos USA , an organization that mobilizes American Christians to support Palestinian rights. Braverman focuses on the intersection of theology, justice, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His work critiques both Jewish and Christian theological frameworks that support Zionism and calls for a prophetic response rooted in human rights and reconciliation. His major works include Fatal Embrace: Christians, Jews, and the Search for Peace in the Holy Land and numerous essays on interfaith theology and justice. Mark Braverman. Opening Note: In the wake of the Holocaust , Christian theology took a new direction — see...

Which CEO Characteristics and Abilities Matter?

Steven N. Kaplan, Mark M. Klebanov, and Morten Sorensen* Abstract We exploit a unique dataset to study individual characteristics of CEO candidates for companies involved in buyout and venture capital transactions and relate these characteristics to subsequent corporate performance. CEO candidates vary along two primary dimensions: one that captures general ability and another that contrasts communication and interpersonal skills with execution skills. Subsequent performance is positively related to general ability and to execution skills. The findings expand our view of CEO characteristics and types relative to previous studies. SOURCE: http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/steven.kaplan/research/kks.pdf