Skip to main content

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

 



There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth.

Not because conscience triumphs.
Not because morality suddenly awakens.
But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.”

That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable:

“Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilized the Middle East.”

Read that again.

Not they.
We.

Not Israel alone.
We have been part of it.



That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history.

For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as “self-defense,” and marketed devastation as strategic necessity.

Now, from inside that same establishment, comes a confession:

We were part of it.

And yet — here is where moral clarity is strangled by imperial reflex — Sherman follows this extraordinary admission with another declaration:

“It is critical that Israel remains an ally of the U.S., and we protect the right of a Jewish state.”

And there it is.

The confession.
The caveat.
The bloodstain
— followed immediately by a signature on the next weapons package.



Washington’s foreign policy, condensed into one breathtaking contradiction:

Yes, we helped create what is, in essence, genocide…
…and yes, we must continue supporting it.

Imagine applying this logic anywhere else:

We acknowledge mass atrocity — therefore continued military support is essential.

It is a sentence so morally inverted it feels like satire.

But it is not satire.

It is doctrine.




Sherman tries, as seasoned diplomats do, to soften the legal edge:

“I can’t make the legal analysis about whether it is literally a genocide, but there is no doubt that Gaza was demolished.”

This is the language of carefully managed honesty.

Not denying horror.
Not embracing legal responsibility.
Naming catastrophe — while stepping delicately around culpability.

Diplomatic truth often speaks in whispers when screams are warranted.

Yet even in caution, her words are devastating:

“There is no doubt that Gaza was demolished.”

Demolished.

An entire society reduced to rubble, grief, starvation, amputated childhoods, mass graves, broken hospitals, orphaned generations, and cities turned into archaeological ruins of the present.

And the world’s greatest democracy debates terminology.




Sherman also offered another quiet indictment:

Democrats and Republicans “have not dealt with the Middle East in a way that’s helped create stability and peace.”

That is diplomatic language for:

We have spent decades setting fires and calling ourselves firefighters.

Iraq.
Libya.
Syria.
Yemen.
Afghanistan.
And now Gaza —
where America’s bombs, diplomacy, and veto power have become inseparable from the destruction itself.

What extraordinary political theater this is:

First fund catastrophe.
Then lament catastrophe.
Then explain why funding catastrophe must continue.

A moral ouroboros — empire swallowing its own conscience.


The deepest irony is not Sherman’s admission.

It is that truth is finally being spoken only after Gaza has been flattened.

Only after hunger became policy.
Only after children became statistics.
Only after humanitarian law became optional.
Only after the unbearable became routine.

Now establishment voices begin whispering what millions have shouted for years.

Too late for the dead.
Too late for the buried.
Too late for the children whose names will never be spoken in press briefings.


History may remember this moment not as awakening — but as confession without consequence.

An empire looked at devastation.

Called it devastation.

Admitted complicity.

And chose continuity.

That is not tragedy alone.

That is civilizational hypocrisy in its purest modern form.

And perhaps the most chilling line is still the smallest:

“We have been part of it.”

Three words.

A confession.

An indictment.

And unless policy changes — a promise of repetition.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Price Tag Attackers: Extremist Settler Violence in the West Bank.

  Year-by-year breakdown of documented " Price Tag" attacks in the West Bank and Israel , based on reports from UN OCHA , B’Tselem , Yesh Din , and Israeli media (Haaretz, Times of Israel). Introduction to "Price Tag" Attackers  "Price Tag" attackers are extremist Israeli settlers , primarily affiliated with radical right-wing groups, who carry out violent acts agains Palestinians, Israeli security forces, and left-wing activists  in retaliation for perceived threats to Jewish settlements in the West Bank . The term refers to the " price " they seek to impose for actions like outpost demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Israelis.   - Vandalism, arson, or violence by extremist settlers against Palestinians, Israeli security forces, or left-wing activists.      - Often involves graffiti (e.g., "Price Tag," "Revenge," or "Arabs Out").     - Retaliation for Palestinian attacks, outpost demolitions, or Israeli gover...

The Politicization of Antisemitism: Randy Fine, AIPAC, and the Fight Over Anti-Israel Speech

  Randy Fine.  Brief introduction of Randy Fine.  Randy Fine is a U.S. Representative-Elect for Florida's 6th Congressional District and a former Florida State Senator . Born on April 20, 1974, in Tucson , Arizona , Fine holds degrees from Harvard College and Harvard Business School . He began his political career in 2016 as a member of the Florida House of Representatives and later served in the Florida Senate. Fine is known for his strong pro-Israel stance, earning him the nickname " Hebrew Hammer, " and his socially conservative views . He has been involved in contentious legislation and has faced both support and criticism for his policies and rhetoric. Detailed overview of Randy Fine 's stance and legislative efforts related to criminalizing the distribution of anti-Israel flyers, along with broader context about his political agenda and controversies : --- 1. Randy Fine’s Legislative Efforts Against Anti-Israel Flyers - Florida’s Hate Crime Law (2023): ...

The Price of Their Silence: How Islamophobia Became an Industry—and Muslims Its Global Collateral

  🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 28, 2025 They bombed Iraq for democracy. Tortured Afghans in the name of security. Waterboarded bodies at Guantanamo and called it “enhanced interrogation.” And now in Gaza—they bury children under rubble and whisper, self-defense . This isn’t a war on terror. It’s a war on memory, on names, on brown bodies that pray in Arabic. And Islamophobia has been its golden engine—powerful, profitable, and protected. 🧠 Islamophobia: Not Just Prejudice—A $Billions Industry Islamophobia is not just a bias—it’s a well-funded psychological operation . According to the Center for American Progress , over $42 million was channeled (2001–2011) into think tanks and media fronts to craft and normalize anti-Muslim sentiment. This isn’t random—it’s strategic. The goal: keep the public afraid —of Muslims, of mosques, of immigrants, of something called Sharia Law . 📘 Sharia Law: The Manufactured Threat That Never Was Let’s be c...

The Media Sold the War. We Watched It Happen.

What Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide reveals—and what the question of digital witnessing forces us to confront There is a disturbing question at the heart of the Gaza catastrophe that cannot be answered simply by asking what governments did, what armies did, or even what the media reported. There is another question: What did the world do while watching? Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide: The Media’s Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza, published by Pluto Press, approaches Gaza through the machinery of mainstream American media. His investigation examines how some of the most influential institutions in the Western information system—including The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC—framed the destruction of Gaza. It is an important question because wars are not fought only with weapons. They are also fought through language. Before bombs become statistics, they become headlines. Before civilian deaths become numbers, they become narratives. Before dest...

Zionism, Antisemitism — and the Grotesque Death of a Political Theology

  If you ever wanted to witness how confusion, opportunism, theology, nationalism, and bigotry collide in real time — you didn’t need a medieval church council. You only needed to tune into a meeting of the . There, amid political loyalists and pop-culture appointees, a spectacle unfolded: Zionism was denounced, antisemitic conspiracies were flirted with, and centuries-old theological errors were recycled as if they were fresh revelations. But the deeper issue is not one controversial appointee. The deeper issue is this: What precisely is Zionism? And how does it intersect — or collide — with antisemitism? Because in today’s discourse, the two are either falsely merged or lazily separated without thought. Let us disentangle them carefully. 1. What Is Zionism — Precisely? Zionism , in its original and political form, is a 19th-century nationalist movement. It emerged in Europe not from theology, but from crisis. The father of modern political Zionism, , was not respon...