Skip to main content

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

 



There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth.

Not because conscience triumphs.
Not because morality suddenly awakens.
But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.”

That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable:

“Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilized the Middle East.”

Read that again.

Not they.
We.

Not Israel alone.
We have been part of it.



That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history.

For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as “self-defense,” and marketed devastation as strategic necessity.

Now, from inside that same establishment, comes a confession:

We were part of it.

And yet — here is where moral clarity is strangled by imperial reflex — Sherman follows this extraordinary admission with another declaration:

“It is critical that Israel remains an ally of the U.S., and we protect the right of a Jewish state.”

And there it is.

The confession.
The caveat.
The bloodstain
— followed immediately by a signature on the next weapons package.



Washington’s foreign policy, condensed into one breathtaking contradiction:

Yes, we helped create what is, in essence, genocide…
…and yes, we must continue supporting it.

Imagine applying this logic anywhere else:

We acknowledge mass atrocity — therefore continued military support is essential.

It is a sentence so morally inverted it feels like satire.

But it is not satire.

It is doctrine.




Sherman tries, as seasoned diplomats do, to soften the legal edge:

“I can’t make the legal analysis about whether it is literally a genocide, but there is no doubt that Gaza was demolished.”

This is the language of carefully managed honesty.

Not denying horror.
Not embracing legal responsibility.
Naming catastrophe — while stepping delicately around culpability.

Diplomatic truth often speaks in whispers when screams are warranted.

Yet even in caution, her words are devastating:

“There is no doubt that Gaza was demolished.”

Demolished.

An entire society reduced to rubble, grief, starvation, amputated childhoods, mass graves, broken hospitals, orphaned generations, and cities turned into archaeological ruins of the present.

And the world’s greatest democracy debates terminology.




Sherman also offered another quiet indictment:

Democrats and Republicans “have not dealt with the Middle East in a way that’s helped create stability and peace.”

That is diplomatic language for:

We have spent decades setting fires and calling ourselves firefighters.

Iraq.
Libya.
Syria.
Yemen.
Afghanistan.
And now Gaza —
where America’s bombs, diplomacy, and veto power have become inseparable from the destruction itself.

What extraordinary political theater this is:

First fund catastrophe.
Then lament catastrophe.
Then explain why funding catastrophe must continue.

A moral ouroboros — empire swallowing its own conscience.


The deepest irony is not Sherman’s admission.

It is that truth is finally being spoken only after Gaza has been flattened.

Only after hunger became policy.
Only after children became statistics.
Only after humanitarian law became optional.
Only after the unbearable became routine.

Now establishment voices begin whispering what millions have shouted for years.

Too late for the dead.
Too late for the buried.
Too late for the children whose names will never be spoken in press briefings.


History may remember this moment not as awakening — but as confession without consequence.

An empire looked at devastation.

Called it devastation.

Admitted complicity.

And chose continuity.

That is not tragedy alone.

That is civilizational hypocrisy in its purest modern form.

And perhaps the most chilling line is still the smallest:

“We have been part of it.”

Three words.

A confession.

An indictment.

And unless policy changes — a promise of repetition.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Price Tag Attackers: Extremist Settler Violence in the West Bank.

  Year-by-year breakdown of documented " Price Tag" attacks in the West Bank and Israel , based on reports from UN OCHA , B’Tselem , Yesh Din , and Israeli media (Haaretz, Times of Israel). Introduction to "Price Tag" Attackers  "Price Tag" attackers are extremist Israeli settlers , primarily affiliated with radical right-wing groups, who carry out violent acts agains Palestinians, Israeli security forces, and left-wing activists  in retaliation for perceived threats to Jewish settlements in the West Bank . The term refers to the " price " they seek to impose for actions like outpost demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Israelis.   - Vandalism, arson, or violence by extremist settlers against Palestinians, Israeli security forces, or left-wing activists.      - Often involves graffiti (e.g., "Price Tag," "Revenge," or "Arabs Out").     - Retaliation for Palestinian attacks, outpost demolitions, or Israeli gover...

💔 One Eye for Gaza: Hannah Thomas and the Price of Speaking Truth

🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 29, 2025 She stood on the pavement—Hannah Thomas, lawyer, activist, former Greens candidate. She stood—holding no weapon, only a banner and a conscience. She stood—outside a factory that allegedly helps plate the steel for F-35 jets now raining hell on Gaza. And for that—Australian police slammed her to the ground. Now, she may never see from her right eye again. Let that sentence burn into your mind: “She may lose her sight—for standing against genocide.” 🇵🇸 In Gaza, Eyes Are Lost Forever In Gaza, there are no surgeons left for eyes. Eyes are buried beneath concrete. Eyes were starved shut. Eyes were blinded by phosphorus, smoke, dust. Children in Gaza have forgotten what it means to look up without fear. And still, the bombs fall. From October 7, 2023 to now, tens of thousands dead—many torn apart by American-made weapons, polished and prepped by foreign contractors. The livestream genocide has not stopped. The...

The Flood spare no time.

"You have taken back your rights and what we have begun can not go back.... We have one main demand: the end of the regime and the beginning of a new stage, a new Egypt.... I bow to the people of Egypt in respect. I ask of you patience, change is coming in the next few days." This is the speech of Mr. Hosni Mubarak to Protesters. " Bowing to the peoples of Egypt in respect" why so much preassure, why so much frustration. Whether all this was unexpected at all, completely ignoring the power of masses or trusting, enormous trust at "system" that is "leading" the masses?

"Decision point" by George W Bush

The book is written thematically, not chronologically. This is important because it gives the book a much different flavor than one that is written month by month, and year by year. This book was not ghost written. This is his hand and his words, and it comes through on every page - all 512 of them. I had no expectations when I opened the cover other than to enjoy the book. I found it was written with a wonderful light hand, Bush being a story teller, no question about it. And he pulls no punches, he tells you the real deal and he does not filter it. Other people will write pro and con on this book depending upon their political filters. There will be none of that here. I am only interested in enjoying a book and telling you that you will also or maybe not. I am going to give you a flavoring of the book and you will know immediately if this is for you: * In the Presidency there are no do-over's * Quitting drinking was one of the toughest decisions he ever made * It wouldn't be ...