Skip to main content

When the World Gives Permission: From Gaza’s Rubble to the West Bank’s Maps

 




There are moments when history does not announce itself with explosions—but with paperwork.

On paper, Israel’s approval of 19 new settlements in the occupied West Bank is framed as an administrative decision. In reality, it is a cartographic act of violence: borders redrawn without consent, futures erased without headlines, and international law treated as background noise.

This is not an isolated policy choice. It is the logical continuation of a world that watched Gaza burn—and learned nothing.

A Timeline of Forewarning, Ignored

December 11, 2025
Israel’s security cabinet quietly approves 19 new Jewish settlements across the occupied West Bank. The decision remains largely under wraps.

December 20–24, 2025
The news becomes public. Fourteen countries—including the UK, France, Germany, Canada, and Japan—issue a joint appeal urging Israel to reverse the decision, warning it violates international law and undermines any remaining possibility of a two-state solution.

Israel’s response?
A flat rejection.

Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar dismisses the appeal as “foreign interference,” declaring that “foreign governments will not restrict us.” The settlements proceed.

History records this moment not as a dispute—but as a warning ignored in real time.

Reading the Map: How Settlements Kill States Without Bombs

The newly approved settlements are not clustered near Israel’s borders. They are strategically dispersed across the West Bank, penetrating deep into Palestinian territory:

  • Northern West Bank (Jenin region): Re-establishment of settlements dismantled in 2005, such as Ganim and Kadim.
  • Central West Bank (near Nablus and Ramallah): Legalization of previously “unauthorized” outposts like Esh Kodesh and Givat Harel.
  • Southern West Bank (Bethlehem and Hebron areas): Expansion near Palestinian population centers.
  • Jordan Valley: Strategic control of agricultural land and borders.

This is not random growth. It is territorial fragmentation by design.

Each settlement slices Palestinian land into disconnected enclaves, turning villages into islands and roads into checkpoints. The result is a geography where a Palestinian state exists only on diplomatic slides—not on the ground.

Maps don’t just show reality. They create it.

What International Law Actually Says (And Why It’s Being Ignored)

The legal position on settlements is not ambiguous.

  • The West Bank is occupied territory, under international law, since Israel captured it in 1967.
  • Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly prohibits an occupying power from transferring its civilian population into occupied territory.
  • UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016) states that Israeli settlements have “no legal validity” and constitute a “flagrant violation under international law.”
  • The International Court of Justice has repeatedly affirmed that settlement construction in occupied Palestinian territory is illegal.

Israel rejects this interpretation, arguing historical claims and security needs. But legality does not bend to power—it erodes when power goes unchallenged.

And the challenge, today, is theatrical at best.

From Gaza to the West Bank: The Architecture of Permission

What connects Gaza’s devastation to West Bank settlement expansion is not ideology alone—it is impunity.

Gaza demonstrated a brutal truth:
Mass suffering can be livestreamed, condemned, and then normalized.



Once that lesson is learned, expansion becomes easier. Not because the world agrees—but because it has proven it will do nothing meaningful.

This is how ethnic cleansing unfolds in the 21st century:

  • Not only through bombs, but through zoning approvals.
  • Not only through military orders, but through international statements that stop at “deep concern.”
  • Not only through force, but through fatigue.

The West Bank is being erased one settlement at a time, while the world debates wording.



The Real Impact: Life Under Expanding Settlements

For Palestinians, settlements are not abstract legal debates. They mean:

  • Land confiscation without recourse
  • Restricted movement through checkpoints and settler-only roads
  • Increased settler violence, often protected or ignored by the military
  • Economic strangulation and forced displacement

For Israelis who oppose this system, the cost is moral isolation and internal repression.

For the international community, the cost is credibility.

The End of Pretending

Let us be honest:
The two-state solution is not being “undermined.” It is being methodically buried.

What remains is a single regime governing the land between the river and the sea—one with unequal rights, unequal laws, and unequal futures.

To continue calling this a “peace process” is no longer diplomacy. It is fiction.

Final Word: History Is Watching, Even If Governments Aren’t

When future generations ask how this happened, the answer will not be found only in Israeli cabinet meetings.

It will be found in:

  • Statements without consequences
  • Laws without enforcement
  • Maps redrawn while the world scrolled

Gaza showed us what unrestrained power looks like.
The West Bank shows us what comes next when that power is rewarded with silence.

And silence, history reminds us, is never neutral.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...
Post a Comment
Read more

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...
Post a Comment
Read more