Skip to main content

Was 2025 a Good Year for Israeli Security? Why 2026 May Be Far Worse



( This analysis is based primarily on the strategic assessment and outlook of Israeli security analyst and former Mossad officer Yossi Alpher, expanded with recent data, regional developments and independent synthesis.)


At first glance, Israel’s security narrative for 2025 almost writes itself: decisive military pressure against Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran. Hostages returned from Gaza. Iran’s nuclear program set back. Borders that once seemed on the brink of explosion holding a cautious calm.

Set aside internal realities—and yes, by many superficial measures, 2025 looked like a year of suppressed threats and battlefield successes.

But when the smoke clears, the key question is not what was destroyed, but what was built. And the answer is: very little that actually strengthens Israel’s long-term security.

The Myth of Victory: Superficial Stability, Not Strategic Success

To be clear: Israel’s military maintained its edge. Hamas was battered. Iran’s nuclear ambitions were disrupted. Hezbollah was deterred for now.

But none of these outcomes amount to lasting peace — or even sustainable deterrence.

  • Hamas survives: It remains a political and military force and is reestablishing control over large swaths of Gaza, especially under Trump’s ill-defined postwar map.
  • No Palestinian alternative: Israel has blocked every credible Palestinian leadership development, locking in Hamas by default.
  • Iran and Hezbollah rebuild: The so-called victories of 2025 are fragile and reversible.

This is not a triumph. It’s a lull. A dangerous one.

The Hidden Crisis Within: The Collapse of Israel’s Military Backbone

All the military gains of 2025 are undermined by a deepening manpower and morale crisis within the Israel Defense Forces — the very institution that must hold the line in 2026.

Career Officer Exodus: A National Security Red Flag

Recent data reveals a historic collapse in the IDF’s core human capital:

  • Around 600 career military personnel — including senior officers and professional non-commissioned officers — have submitted requests for early retirement, citing burnout, poor conditions, and a lack of legislative support for promised benefits.
  • Competitive promotion pools have shrunk sharply: where once ~800 candidates competed for 400 lieutenant colonel slots, now only about 500 do — meaning anyone willing to stay is promoted, not just the best.
  • Surveys show a significant drop in career officers planning to stay in service — only 42% expressed willingness to remain, down sharply from earlier figures.

This is not a statistical glitch or isolated trend. It is a systemic breakdown of professional military commitment, the lifeblood of a modern defense force.

Why It Matters

  • Career officers are not just commanders — they are the mentors, trainers, planners, and institutional memory of the IDF.
  • The depletion of experienced leaders forces rapid, superficial promotions that weaken readiness and sacrifice competence for completion of rosters.
  • The loss of trust — between soldiers, leadership, and the state — corrodes morale just when it is needed most.

An army without its best does not deter; it deteriorates.

A Society at War With Itself

Israel’s internal condition in 2025 further corrodes its security:

  • Politicized security institutions: Senior positions in Shin Bet and Mossad have gone to loyalists rather than professionals, weakening institutional credibility.
  • Settler militias in the West Bank are increasingly acting with open encouragement from political leadership, undermining law and order while provoking new cycles of violence.
  • Erosion of social cohesion: More Israelis — especially secular and liberal ones — are leaving or contemplating departure, weakening societal resilience.

Israeli security is no longer just about borders and gun barrels — it’s about the cohesion of an entire society. On this measure, 2025 delivered losses far more profound than any battlefield win.

2026 Security Prospects: A Year of Rising Danger

As 2026 approaches, the structural fault lines in Israeli security widen:

Gaza: Chaos, Not Peace

President Trump’s Phase 2 plan calls for an international presence and reconstruction — but neither Israel nor Hamas enthusiastically supports it. Netanyahu’s historical record of undermining the second phase of agreements warns that Phase 2 may be a self-sabotaged illusion. International investment, foreign forces, and conditional governance will not substitute for genuine political solutions.

Expect Gaza in 2026 to remain volatile, unstable, and ultimately unresolved.

The West Bank: Escalation Brewing

As pressure mounts over Gaza schemes, right-wing elements within Israel’s government will likely accelerate settlement expansion and “Judaization” projects. This will fuel Palestinian resistance, spark more attacks, and widen friction with Jordan — raising the specter of a new multi-front crisis.

If another shock akin to October 7 is to occur, the West Bank is a likely flashpoint.

The North: The Only Tentative Hope

On the northern front, there is some cautious ground for optimism. Direct talks with Lebanon and Syria have started, backed by active U.S. engagement. Progress will be slow, uneven, and fraught — but incremental movement toward more stable borders is possible.

This may be the one area in 2026 where Israel’s security is not deteriorating.

Global Fallout: Isolation and Anger

Internationally, 2026 may bring more of the same:

  • Increased global criticism and antisemitism, partly fueled by Israel’s conduct in Gaza.
  • Trump’s volatile alliance, offering support but demanding policy compliance.
  • European disengagement and growing diplomatic isolation.

Friends in authoritarian capitals may offer transactional ties, but these are not stable foundations for genuine security or legitimacy.

Violence Will Persist

Israeli policy still assumes that killing militant leaders reduces terrorism — an assumption consistently disproven by decades of global experience. Islamist extremists, meanwhile, continue to believe that killing Jews advances their aims — ensuring that violence, terror attacks, and retaliatory cycles remain part of 2026’s reality.

The Bottom Line: What Will Determine 2026

Israel’s security prospects for 2026 hinge on two variables:

  1. President Trump’s unpredictable policies, and
  2. Israel’s elections and governance choices.

If political leadership prioritizes ideology over competence, avoids internal reckoning, and doubles down on division rather than reconciliation, then 2026 will be far worse than 2025.

Victory isn’t defined by what was destroyed in 2025 — but by whether Israel builds anything stronger, wiser, and more unified going forward.

Because an army without its leaders, a society without cohesion, and a security policy without reflection is not secure at all.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

  There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...
Post a Comment
Read more

When a Constitution Becomes a Decorative Document America’s Latest War, and the Curious Death of Accountability

  There is an imperial comedy unfolding before the world — dark enough to be tragedy, absurd enough to be satire. This is, after all, the very “model democracy” United States  has spent decades promising to export to humanity — by missile, by occupation, by sanctions, by “shock and awe,” by solemn lectures on liberty delivered from polished podiums standing atop broken nations. This was the sermon preached to Iraq. Imposed on Afghanistan. Invoked amid the destruction of Libya . Entangled in the agony of Syria. Echoed through the devastation of Yemen.  The doctrine was always wrapped in noble language: Rule of law. Democratic institutions. Constitutional order. Checks and balances. How magnificent those words sound — right up until power decides they are optional at home. What a remarkable export product: A democracy where Congress yields, courts hesitate, executive power expands, wars begin first and legal arguments arrive later — wrapped in flags, marketed...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

  There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth. Not because conscience triumphs. Not because morality suddenly awakens. But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.” That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable: “ Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilize d the Middle East.” Read that again. Not they . We. Not Israel alone . We have been part of it. That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history. For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the Readers Move Ahead of the Columnist

  There is something quietly seismic happening—not in the corridors of power, not in carefully worded opinion columns, but in the comment sections beneath them. While attempts to diagnose where Israel “lost its way,” the readers seem to be asking a far more unsettling question: What if it didn’t lose its way at all? What if this is the way? For decades, the comforting narrative was simple: the problem was leadership. Replace , and the moral arc would gently correct itself. Peace would again become plausible. Restraint would return. The “real Israel” would re-emerge. But the readers are no longer convinced. They are pointing to something deeper—something less convenient. Not a deviation. A pattern. Not an exception. A structure. Because when policies persist across decades, across governments, across crises—at what point do we stop calling them mistakes and start calling them design? The Quiet Collapse of a Narrative One reader puts it bluntly: Palestinians have alr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Europe’s Moral Geometry: When Genocide Is Debated, Delayed, and Diplomatically Diluted

There are moments in history when silence is loud. And then there are moments like this—when everyone is speaking , issuing statements, holding summits, drafting resolutions… and yet the bombs keep falling, the children keep starving, and the moral center keeps shrinking. Welcome to Europe’s finest performance: Outrage in words. Paralysis in action. The Open-Air Prison, Now Under Famine In Gaza, the siege has evolved into something colder, more clinical— a system . Food is not merely scarce; it is withheld . Water is not merely contaminated; it is denied . Fuel is not merely limited; it is strategically restricted . Medicine is not merely delayed; it is blocked at the gates of survival . What emerges is not an accidental crisis but a designed collapse —a famine so severe it edges toward Category 5 classification , where starvation is no longer a byproduct of war but a method of it . And yet, across Europe, the language remains exquisitely careful: “Humanitarian concern.”...
Post a Comment
Read more