Skip to main content

Unity, Inclusion, and Strategic Apathy: A Crystal-Clear Message for the EBU

 


The Trophy's Return: A Glittering Glimpse of the Moral High Ground

​Oh, darling. The drama! The sheer, unadulterated scandal!

​Our very own 2024 Eurovision winner, Nemo Mettler, has bravely returned their iconic glass microphone trophy to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). And why, you ask? Did the trophy clash with the new curtains? Was it too difficult to dust? No, sweetlings. It was for the much more quaint, old-fashioned reason of—gaspprinciple.

​The Swiss non-binary star has dared to suggest that hosting a global celebration of "unity" and "dignity for all" while simultaneously platforming a state that a UN body has tied to allegations of genocide in Gaza might, just might, constitute a "clear conflict."

The audacity!

The EBU's Stunning Performance of Strategic Apathy

​Let’s be honest, the EBU deserves an award of its own. Not for music, but for its stunning, decades-long performance of Strategic Apathy: The Non-Political Power Ballad.

​For years, we've all clapped along as they’ve sung their beautiful, soaring chorus: "Eurovision is NOT political! It's about music! It’s about love!" All while merrily banning Russian acts for geopolitical reasons, demanding specific lyrical changes, and generally treating the contest as a giant, glitter-soaked diplomatic minefield.

​But this year, facing a catastrophe described by international bodies as potentially genocidal, the EBU has truly outdone itself. They’ve clutched their pearls, shielded their eyes from the bloodshed, and proclaimed, with the stoic conviction of a particularly stubborn garden gnome: "Nope, nothing to see here. Carry on with the singing!"

​Five entire nations—Spain, Ireland, Iceland, Slovenia, and the Netherlands—have now announced they are boycotting the 2026 contest. Five! But fear not! The EBU, a true paragon of democratic process, decided a vote on Israel’s inclusion was unnecessary. Why let pesky things like member broadcaster opinion or mass civilian casualties get in the way of a perfectly good light show?

Nemo’s Cold Shower of Reality

Nemo, in their infinite wisdom, basically sent the EBU a note reading: "If the values we celebrate onstage aren't lived offstage, then even the most beautiful songs become meaningless."

Meaningless. Imagine!

​The return of that beautiful, delicate, microphone-shaped symbol of fleeting musical glory is the sound of a velvet glove slapping the EBU across the face. It’s a beautifully choreographed moral mic-drop. It says: "This is not just a song contest; it’s a distraction. And the price of that distraction is too high."

​So, the trophy is back in Geneva. Perhaps it can be placed on a pedestal labelled: "The Symbol of Our Collective Cognitive Dissonance." A glittering monument to the idea that a multi-billion dollar entertainment spectacle can simply hum a happy tune while the world outside is being bombed into dust.

​The EBU wanted unity? They've got it! Unity in the collective, eye-rolling cynicism of everyone watching them choose dazzling indifference over basic humanity.

​Bravo, Nemo. And to the EBU, enjoy your hollow glass relic. May its emptiness ring louder than any winner's song.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

  By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...