Bulldozers of “Security”: How to Make Refugees Disappear Without Calling It Ethnic Cleansing.

There is something almost admirable about the consistency. When Israel issues a new demolition order for a Palestinian refugee camp, it does so with the calm precision of a bureaucracy that knows it will never be meaningfully challenged. This week’s announcement targeting Nur Shams camp in the northern West Bank is not a shock. It is a reminder. A reminder that devastation, when repeated often enough, is rebranded as “routine security policy.”

Twenty-five buildings are scheduled for demolition starting 18 December. Hundreds of Palestinians—already displaced, already waiting, already exhausted—will once again be told to pack what little remains of their lives. This, we are assured, is not punishment. It is “military necessity.” The phrase functions like holy water: sprinkle it on rubble and the crime dissolves.

Satellite imagery shows that nearly half the camp—48 percent—was already damaged or destroyed before this latest order. In any other context, this would be called saturation destruction. Here, it is called restraint.

Control, Not Security—But Say It Softly

Roland Friedrich of UNRWA said the quiet part out loud: these demolitions aim at long-term control, permanently altering the camps’ topography. Translation: make return impossible, memory inconvenient, and permanence Palestinian-proof.

The camps are not being “secured.” They are being redesigned—bulldozed into submission, reshaped into absence. Walls and streets are replaced with cleared zones where history once lived. Maps are edited not with pens but with Caterpillars.

And yet we are asked, with straight faces, to believe that destroying homes makes people safer. Safer for whom? The children sleeping in borrowed rooms? The elderly counting months of exile? Or the state that fears the mere existence of a refugee who remembers where home used to be?

Operation Iron Wall: Branding Brutality

The Israeli military named its campaign “Operation Iron Wall.” Subtlety has officially been retired. What began in Jenin expanded neatly into Tulkarm, Nur Shams, and El Far’a—because when displacement works once, why stop?

More than 32,000 Palestinian refugees in the northern West Bank have been forcibly displaced. Many have waited 11 months to return home. Eleven months of hope stretched thin, only to be crushed again—this time with formal paperwork and a demolition schedule.

Every strike of the bulldozer answers their waiting with clarity: you are not meant to return.

Schools, Clinics, and the Crime of Existing

Nur Shams camp is not a “terrorist hub.” It is a living place. It has schools—two of them—serving over 1,500 children. It has a health center providing immunizations, reproductive care, infant health services. In other words, it commits the gravest offense imaginable: it sustains Palestinian life.

And so it must be erased.

Because erasing infrastructure is easier than erasing people. And erasing people is easier when the world pretends not to see.

International Law, Gently Ignored

At the UN Security Council, Deputy Special Coordinator Ramiz Alakbarov spoke with the weary politeness of international diplomacy. Israeli operations, he said, have caused high fatalities, mass displacement, and large-scale destruction, especially in refugee camps. Continued military presence, he reminded everyone, contravenes international law.

This includes Resolution 2334, which Israel has ignored with impressive dedication, and the International Court of Justice advisory opinion of July 2024, which obliges Israel to halt settlements, evacuate settlers, and end its unlawful occupation.

Israel’s response so far has been admirably concise: no.

Record Settlements, Record Silence

Settlement expansion has reached its highest level since UN tracking began nearly a decade ago. Settler violence is rising. Olive trees are burned. Farmers are assaulted during harvest. Land is taken while diplomats issue statements “expressing concern.”

Apparently, ethnic cleansing progresses fastest when accompanied by strong words and zero consequences.

The Final Irony

Refugee camps exist because of displacement. Destroying them does not solve the refugee question—it attempts to bury it. If the camps vanish, perhaps the refugees will too. Or so the logic goes.

But history is stubborn. Rubble remembers. And refugees, even when scattered, carry maps no bulldozer can erase.

Nur Shams is not being demolished because it is dangerous. It is being demolished because it refuses to disappear quietly.

And the world, once again, is watching closely—doing absolutely nothing—while calling it balance.

Comments

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...

Our Genocide: When Silence Becomes Complicity

The world watches. The bombs fall. And a human tragedy of unfathomable scale unfolds. On July 28, 2025, B’Tselem , Israel’s foremost human rights organization, issued a report titled Our Genocide — a document that shatters decades of euphemism and denial. For the first time, a major Israeli human rights group did not merely describe violence in Gaza as disproportionate or unlawful — it named it for what it is: genocide . “ A coordinated attack to destroy Palestinian society” B’Tselem did not arrive at this conclusion lightly. The report painstakingly documents the consequences of nearly 22 months of war — cities erased, families obliterated, a society made into rubble. “An examination of Israel’s policy in the Gaza Strip and its horrific outcomes, together with statements by senior Israeli politicians and military commanders about the goals of the attack, leads us to the unequivocal conclusion that Israel is taking coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian societ...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog