Skip to main content

The Science of Fear: How Islamophobia Became a Campaign Strategy

 


When Zohran Mamdani stood before a roaring crowd and declared,

No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in Islamophobia and win an election,”
he wasn’t just celebrating victory — he was delivering a eulogy for a long, poisonous political playbook.

Because let’s face it — Islamophobia has never just been about prejudice.
It’s been a strategypolished, funded, and weaponized into one of the most successful vote-getting formulas in modern politics.


The Machinery of Fear

The arithmetic is simple — and sinister.
Take a minority that makes up barely 2% of the U.S. population.
Turn them into the symbolic threat for the other 98%.
Feed that fear with millions of dollars, wrap it in the flag, and sell it as “security.

According to a 2021 CAIR report, more than $105 million was funneled to just 26 anti-Muslim organizations between 2017 and 2019 — money laundered through “mainstream charitable” institutions.
That’s not democracy in action. That’s an industry of hatea factory that produces fear, prints division, and sells it wholesale every election season.

And it works. Because fear, when repeated enough, begins to sound like truth.


Funded Fear and Manufactured Panic

Researchers at Rutgers University call this the strategic logic of Islamophobic populism.”
Translation: Politicians don’t need a real problem when they can create a Muslim one.
Fewer Muslims in a country? Perfect. It means louder fear-mongering with fewer people to challenge it.

It’s electoral physicsfear expands to fill the vacuum where truth should live.
Why solve poverty, healthcare, or housing crises when you can invent a boogeyman and call it policy?

In Europe, the irony deepens — the EU even allocated €17 million to projects on “Islam, Sharia, and Islamophobia.”
Apparently, “studying Muslims” has become the West’s favorite academic pastime — a sort of 21st-century anthropology of paranoia.


Fear as a Political Currency

Every election cycle, the same theater plays out with clockwork precision:
Mosques become “security risks.”
Hijabs become “provocations.”
Halal food becomes “cultural infiltration.”
And suddenly, your Muslim neighbor — the doctor, the teacher, the Uber driver — is transformed into a national emergency.

The cruelty isn’t accidental; it’s calculated.
Because fear votes.
And as long as fear keeps voting, Islamophobia remains the cheapest, most efficient campaign slogan ever written.


Hate, Inc. — The Business of Bigotry

The Islamophobia Research & Documentation Project at UC Berkeley has already mapped this empire — a network of think tanks, pundits, and lobbyists who sell fear like it’s fast food.
It’s franchised, automated, and fully tax-deductible.

Hate, Inc. — now with global shipping.

Meanwhile, Gallup polls show most Muslims in Western nations feel they’re not respected in society.
Studies link Islamophobia to spikes in depression, anxiety, and hate crimes.
But sure — keep saying “it’s just politics.”


Mamdani’s Line in the Sand

So when Mamdani said, No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in Islamophobia and win an election,”
he wasn’t just speaking for New York — he was speaking for every city, every country, every generation trapped in the algorithm of hate.

His victory wasn’t just political — it was moral.
It told every Muslim child who’s been told to “blend in,every woman stopped for her scarf, every man whose name was treated like a threat:
You are no longer silent data in someone else’s fear campaign.

It told the political elite that their most reliable currency — fear — has expired.


The Ironic Aftermath

The irony, of course, is delicious.
Those who built their empires on fear are now the ones afraid — terrified of a world that’s learning to see through the lie.

Islamophobia, once a winning strategy, has become a mirrorexposing who truly fears whom.
Because the ones who dehumanize others are always the ones terrified of losing their own humanity.

So yes, Mr. Mamdani — enough.
No more Islamophobia to win elections.
No more moral bankruptcy disguised as patriotism.
No more democracy powered by division.

Because the beast they’ve been feeding for decades — the one fattened on hate, fear, and ignorance — is finally choking on its own lies.
And the world, at last, is watching — not afraid, but awake.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ceasefire of Exhaustion: When Empires Collapse from Within

  By Malik Mukhtar — ainnbeen.blogspot.com Two years after Gaza was first set on fire , the war that began with biblical vengeance has stumbled to an exhausted ceasefire . On October 9, 2025 , Israel and Hamas — after endless carnage, famine, and rubble — have signed the first phase of a ceasefire agreement mediated in Sharm el-Sheikh . Trump called it a “ historic peace plan. ” History may call it a truce of attrition — a war that collapsed under the weight of its own hubris. What the Ceasefire Says — and What It Doesn’t Under the agreement, Israeli forces are to pull back to a designated “yellow line” within 24 hours of cabinet ratification. Hamas, in turn, will release all remaining hostages — alive or dead — within 72 hours after the withdrawal. Israel will free about 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, though it made sure to exclude political figures like Marwan Barghouti , whose freedom would remind the world that Palestine still breathes. Humanitarian convoys — food,...

“They Came Home Broken":The Brutal Truth Behind the October 2025 Palestinian Releases

  They walked free —yet came home with broken bodies , shattered spirits , and scars that cannot be erased. On October 13, 2025, nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees were released from Israeli custody in return for hostages freed by Hamas. Many rejoiced; families wept with relief. But behind those scenes, a darker story surfaced—one of systemic abuse, medical neglect, and a betrayal of human dignity. The Faces Behind the Numbers Among those finally returned was Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya , a beloved hospital doctor in Gaza, whose ordeal reveals the brutality that many are still too afraid to speak about. He arrived having lost more than 20 kg in just two months , with fractured ribs from interrogation , a worsening heart condition denied proper medical attention , and the scars of solitary confinement and torture. He is not alone. In the landmark “ Welcome to Hell ” report, 55 formerly held Palestinians shared chilling testimonies : starvation diets, savage beatings, r...

How to Oppose Annexation Without Actually Opposing It: The Trump Doctrine of Elegant Hypocrisy

  The Art of Saying No While Handing Over the Keys: Trump’s De Facto Annexation Gift to Israel Ah yes — the era of “ principled diplomacy.” The Trump administration, that self-proclaimed guardian of “fairness” in the Middle East, will forever be remembered for its masterclass in political double-speak — a rare performance where the United States verbally opposed Israel’s annexation of the West Bank while physically laying down the red carpet for it. It’s like saying, “ Please, don’t steal the car,” while quietly tossing over the keys, disabling the alarm, and complimenting the thief’s driving skills. The Great Paradox — or Just the Great Performance? Let’s call it what it was: a paradox of diplomacy , or perhaps more accurately , a farce performed for global consumption . In words , the Trump administration urged restraint — telling Netanyahu that annexation should be “coordinated,” “negotiated,” and “timed wisely.” In reality , it was busy dismantling every legal and dip...

The Orphans of Occupation: Israel’s Forgotten Militias After the Ceasefire

By Malik Mukhtar — ainnbeen.blogspot.com Two years of blood and rubble later , Israel’s war on Gaza has ended not with victory parades but with an exhausted exhale — and a fresh moral hangover. Among the wreckage, a strange question lingers like smoke after a fire: What happens to Israel’s “friends” inside Gaza — those Popular Forces , those hastily armed “ Anti-Terror” auxiliaries , those who bet their lives on serving the occupier’s script? The Frankenstein Files In the ruins of Rafah and Khan Younis, Israel’s internal intelligence service, the Shin Bet , built a small army of convenience — men with grudges, ambition, or desperation . They were told they were the future of Gaza : the new “anti-Hamas,” the “security partners,” the “civil order.” For months, they helped identify targets, pass intelligence, and even guard IDF-controlled zones. Some were given money, others weapons. A few were promised “ protection ” — a promise now as worthless as the rubble beneath their fee...

The World as Gaza: Necropolitics and the Calculus of Survival

  “ The ultimate expression of sovereignty resides in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die.” — Achille Mbembe, “Necropolitics” There are philosophies that dissect history, and there are philosophies that bleed through it. Achille Mbembe’s Necropolitics belongs to the latter — it is not an academic exercise, but a diagnosis of the world’s moral decay. In his words, modern sovereignty is no longer about governing life — it is about managing death . It decides who is allowed to breathe, who must suffocate, and who will exist in the space between. Nowhere is this calculus of death more visible, more technologically refined, and more ethically bankrupt than in Palestine . The siege of Gaza has transformed necropolitics from theory into geography — a place where the architecture of control and the arithmetic of survival intersect. The Right to Kill, the Duty to Let Die In Necropolitics , Mbembe extends Foucault’s biopower — the power to “...