Skip to main content

⚽ When the Stadium Becomes a Sermon: Maccabi Tel Aviv and the Weaponization of Words




 Ah, the Maccabi Tel Aviv stadiumwhere football meets foreign policy, and chants echo louder than conscience.

From the stands that once roared for goals, now rise songs of vengeance. Fans waving flags, shouting slogans that flirt dangerously with hate — but don’t you dare call that “incitement.” Because when it’s Maccabi Tel Aviv fans chanting hate against Palestinians, it’s “passion.” But when a student, an artist, or a protester whispers From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” it’s apparently a call for genocide.

Funny, isn’t it?

From the river to the sea” — six simple words that suddenly become more dangerous than missiles, more criminal than occupation, and more scandalous than the daily bombings of children.

But when fans of Maccabi Tel Aviv chant songs glorifying the flattening of Gaza, mocking starving families, or cheering “there are no civilians in Gaza” — the moral referees of the world go silent. No statements from the Anti-Defamation League, no breathless CNN panels about “rising Jewish extremism,” no European Parliament condemnations. Just the same tired shrug: “They’re emotional. It’s war.”

So let’s decode this moral algebra, shall we?

  • From the river to the sea” = antisemitism, extremism, hate speech.
  • Wipe Gaza off the map = grief, trauma, and national pride.
  • Free Palestine = terrorism, threat, danger.
  • Flatten Rafah = “self-defense.”

It’s almost poetic — how the powerful have copyrighted pain and trademarked morality.




When Palestinian children paint “Free Palestine” on walls of ruins, it’s “radical.”
When Maccabi fans paint “Death to Arabs” on stadium walls, it’s “sports culture.”
When a pro-Palestine chant echoes in a university, it’s “hate speech.
When a pro-Israel mob burns Palestinian flags in Europe, it’s “solidarity.”



Even irony seems to have fled the scene.

The same commentators who say “From the river to the sea” erases Israel conveniently forget that Israel’s own leaders, from Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu, declared sovereignty from that same river to that same sea. The difference is that one vision imagines coexistence and freedom, the other, military control and checkpoints.

But apparently, history too has a preferred accent — it only speaks Hebrew when it wants to be believed.

The Maccabi Tel Aviv incident is not just about football — it’s about the normalization of hate when it comes wrapped in a flag, blessed by the narrative of “defense.” It’s about how antisemitism has been redefined to mean anti-occupation. How solidarity with Palestine has become a thought crime.



Meanwhile, the world that preaches about democracy in stadiums and “values on the field” still can’t muster the courage to say the simplest truth:

There is no moral red card for apartheid.

So the next time someone tells you “From the river to the sea” is antisemitic, remind them of the chants echoing through the Maccabi Tel Aviv stands — not of liberation, but of annihilation. Remind them how the world rushes to silence peace slogans while applauding the soundtrack of war.

Because if words can kill, then hypocrisy has already buried the truth.

And perhaps — just perhaps — “From the river to the sea” isn’t a threat.
It’s a heartbeat the world is too afraid to hear.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...