By Malik Mukhtar — ainnbeen.blogspot.com
Two years of blood and rubble later, Israel’s war on Gaza has ended not with victory parades but with an exhausted exhale — and a fresh moral hangover.
Among the wreckage, a strange question lingers like smoke after a fire:
What happens to Israel’s “friends” inside Gaza — those Popular Forces, those hastily armed “Anti-Terror” auxiliaries, those who bet their lives on serving the occupier’s script?
The Frankenstein Files
In the ruins of Rafah and Khan Younis, Israel’s internal intelligence service, the Shin Bet, built a small army of convenience — men with grudges, ambition, or desperation. They were told they were the future of Gaza: the new “anti-Hamas,” the “security partners,” the “civil order.”
For months, they helped identify targets, pass intelligence, and even guard IDF-controlled zones. Some were given money, others weapons. A few were promised “protection” — a promise now as worthless as the rubble beneath their feet.
Because the war is over, the cameras have moved on, and the people who created them have suddenly developed a case of moral amnesia.
Shin Bet’s Dilemma: Protect the Puppets
Inside Tel Aviv’s security meetings, the Shin Bet reportedly begged the government to relocate these fighters — the very men who served Israel’s cause — into secure army camps.
Not out of compassion, of course, but self-interest. Dead collaborators make poor informants.
But the Israeli government refused.
“Too messy,” said the army.
“Too political,” said the ministers.
“Too visible,” said the diplomats.
The country that razed Gaza to “eliminate terrorism” suddenly found itself allergic to the smell of its own creation.
The Moral Refugee
So where will they go, these men of the “Popular Forces”?
They cannot return home — Hamas will hunt them.
They cannot flee — no one wants them.
They cannot stay — Israel has washed its hands.
They are the moral refugees of a war that claimed to be about purity — left to rot between the walls of denial and the borders of hypocrisy.
This, perhaps, is the final obscenity of the war: the army that prides itself on “no one left behind” has left behind its own mercenaries.
The Silence of Accountability
What does it say about a state that creates militias, arms them, uses them — and then refuses to protect them once the mission is over?
It says what we already knew: that the occupation has no loyalty, no ideology, no allies — only temporary tools.
The Popular Forces were not partners. They were human sandbags in Israel’s war narrative.
Now that the ceasefire has arrived, those sandbags are no longer needed.
They can be quietly buried — not in official graves, but in the footnotes of “security analysis.”
The Political Necropolis
Meanwhile, the ceasefire agreement reads like a eulogy disguised as diplomacy.
The “buffer zones,” the “deconfliction corridors,” the “security vetting” — all bureaucratic synonyms for forgetting.
Israel’s generals may have lost the war of deterrence, but they have mastered the art of deletion.
Delete the partners who helped them.
Delete the civilians they starved.
Delete the very history that contradicts the story of “self-defense.”
And when the next war comes — as it surely will — they’ll recruit another batch of desperate men and call them heroes until they become liabilities.
The Final Irony
If there’s poetry left in this tragedy, it’s this:
The men who believed they were on the winning side now know what it feels like to be Gazan.
Abandoned, disposable, and expendable in someone else’s security doctrine.
History won’t remember their names.
It will remember the silence that followed them — and the country that built its power on betrayal, one collaborator at a time.
Epilogue: The Orphans of Occupation
Every empire leaves behind orphans — the translators, the informants, the soldiers-for-hire — who discover too late that loyalty has no currency in colonial arithmetic.
Gaza’s “Anti-Terror Service” now joins that grim lineage.
And somewhere, amid the ashes of a shattered land, the echo of their folly mingles with the cries of the innocent — both victims of the same master.
Authenticated Sources & References
-
Haaretz – “Shin Bet Warns Government Over Fate of Gaza Collaborators After Ceasefire” (Haaretz, Oct 2025)
Reveals internal debate within Israeli security cabinet over protection or transfer of local militias formed in Gaza. -
The Guardian – “Israel’s Shadow Militias in Gaza: Inside the Anti-Hamas ‘Popular Forces’” (Oct 2025)
Detailed investigation into Israel-backed local fighters, their creation, operations, and current vulnerability. -
Al Jazeera Investigations – “The ‘Anti-Terror Service’: Israel’s New Gaza Militias and Their Uncertain Future” (Oct 8, 2025)
Examines the clandestine training and subsequent abandonment of pro-Israel Gazan units. -
Reuters – “Israeli Security Sources: Shin Bet Proposed Relocating Gaza Allies to Army Zones; Cabinet Rejected” (Oct 2025)
Confirms the Shin Bet recommendation to move collaborators for their safety and intelligence preservation. -
+972 Magazine – “How Israel Created and Disowned Gaza’s Collaborator Networks” (Sept 2025)
Explores the political and moral collapse of Israel’s proxy strategy inside Gaza. -
BBC News – “Ceasefire Raises Questions Over Israel’s Local Allies in Gaza” (Oct 10, 2025)
Analyzes the policy debate within Israel and risks of reprisals against pro-Israel Gaza militias. -
The Intercept – “The Ghost Armies of Gaza: How Intelligence Wars Breed Disposable Allies” (Oct 2025)
Investigative account on the long-term consequences of Israel’s informal militias for Gaza’s postwar order.
By Malik Mukhtar
📖 Read more at ainnbeen.blogspot.com
✒️ A record of conscience in a world that has forgotten its own.
Comments