Skip to main content

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.



So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “recognises the State of Palestine.” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption. It’s theatre.

1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration

Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future.

On 2 November 1917, Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared:

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

Notice that phrase: “civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities”. It’s a clause written in ink on paper. But it never protected much else. Because what followed was displacement, dispossession, marginalisation. The “non-Jewish communities” were never treated as equals. Britain’s promise of “best endeavours” becomes grotesque when civilians become targets, when rights are “prejudiced”, when lives are seen as incidental.

2. Reinventing Complicity: UK Parliamentary Records, Today

Fast forward to today. Recognise Palestine, we do. But let’s look at what Britain is doing while recognition is tagged on like a ribbon.

Below are direct quotes from Hansard debates and recent parliamentary proceedings.

A. Arms Export Licences Debate (12 December 2023)

From Arms Export Licences: Israel:

Zarah Sultana (Coventry South):
“More than 18,000 Palestinians, including more than 7,000 children, have been killed. More than 80% of the population — 1.8 million people — has been displaced. Almost 100 journalists have been killed … Behind those horrifying statistics are real people … getting this debate about getting the Government to commit to ending these arms licences so that we are not complicit in war crimes.”

She also mentioned:
“We know that we have issued arms licences to the Israeli Government worth £474 million since 2015. Included in those licences are parts for F-35 fighter jets — stealth aircraft that are currently unleashing hell on Gaza.”

B. Responses from the Government in that Debate

Greg Hands (Minister for Trade Policy) said:
“We must not forget how this conflict started. … A massacre that rightly appalled the world. Barbarism, brutality and inhumanity are not words that we should use lightly … Israel has a clear right to defend itself, while of course complying with international law. … it is only right that we continue to engage with Israel to ensure that its campaign is targeted against Hamas combatants and military infrastructure.”

Translation: “Yes, people are dying. But we’ll stay engaged with the killer, provided it claims to comply with international law.” As though that breathing, fragile claim gives licence to everything else.

C. Arms & Military Cargo Export Controls (Debate, 2 June 2025)

Steve Witherden (Labour MP) rose in that debate with this indictment:
“Since 7 October, Israel has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians. As a father, the thought of the loss of a single child is heartbreaking; the estimate of more than 50,000 children killed or injured in the Gaza strip is inconceivable.”

Warinder Juss added:
“The exports have included items such as bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and similar munitions of war. … Since October 2023 there have been at least 14 shipments of military goods from the UK to Israel. Those include over 8,500 munitions, bombs, grenades, missiles, and 146 armoured vehicle parts. In October 2023 alone, the UK exported 150,000 bullets.”

D. Government’s Claimed Safeguards

From these debates:

Zarah Sultana asked:
“It is an absolute duty on our Government … where arms or components used in arms are used in violation of international law … there must be an immediate suspension of exports and a review.”

And the response from the Government side:

On 30 November 2023, Secretary of State for Business and Trade said:
“Export licences are kept under careful and continual review as standard, and we are able to amend licences or refuse new licence applications if they are inconsistent with the strategic export licensing criteria.”

3. Piecing It Together: Recognition vs. Action

Now, you have this set of truths:

  • Britain in 1917 promised to “facilitate” a national home for Jewish people in Palestine, while preserving rights of non-Jewish inhabitants. Balfour’s caveat has long been shredded.

  • In 2023-2025, UK Parliament acknowledged arms licences worth hundreds of millions to Israel, F-35 parts, shipments of bombs, grenades, etc., even while thousands of children and civilians are being killed in Gaza.

  • The Government claims constant review, licensing criteria, and international law compliance — but in practice, many of the items exported may well be used in operations in Gaza or against civilians.

  • Recognition of statehood by Britain is being celebrated — yet at the same time, Britain continues to provide the tools of war.

4. Sharpened Sarcasm

Let’s sharpen this:

“We recognise Palestine,” says Britain.
“But we will continue licensing bombs, stealth-fighter parts, surveillance, intelligence, trade in weapon-components, training.”


 

So it recognises, while arming. It recognises, while enabling. It recognises, while profiting, while facilitating, while shielding. It recognises, while the smoke, the ruin, the children’s graveyards pile up.




Recognition without meaningful action? That is complicity. Recognition with a handshake to the killer, while you keep sharpening his knife? That is hypocrisy.

5. What Would True Recognition Look Like

Let this be clear: recognition means nothing unless it is backed by brave, real, painful decisions. These are not soft asks; they are moral imperatives.

  • Immediate suspension of all arms export licences to any end-user in Israel / IDF, especially for items that could or do facilitate operations in Gaza, drone strikes, fighter-aircraft parts, etc.
  • Full transparency in the licensing process, with public disclosure of what is going where, through which companies, who is responsible.
  • Cease intelligence & surveillance support that can be used for targeting Palestinian civilian areas.
  • Stop all military training that enhances operational capacity of units involved in operations in Gaza or the West Bank.
  • Push for independent investigations into alleged violations of international humanitarian law; support accountability via international courts.

6. Conclusion: Britain, You Were There, You’re Still There

Britain lit the fuse:

  • The Balfour Declaration didn’t simply announce support. It planted the seeds of dispossession, displacement, injustice.
  • Under the Mandate, British forces suppressed Palestinian resistance, controlled land, immigration, civil rights.
  • In 1948, Britain’s withdrawal didn’t end the colonial project — it handed over the structure.
  • Since then, Britain has traded with, armed, trained, allied with Israel — even when serious allegations of war crimes stood stand.

Recognising Palestine now without ceasing your role in the machinery of war is like a doctor declaring themselves against sickness while still infecting patients.

Britain is not absolved by wrapping recognition in flowery words. Recognition must mean something. If not, it is just Britain saying: we see the victim, we call them a state — while giving the aggressor tools to kill them longer.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“They Came Home Broken":The Brutal Truth Behind the October 2025 Palestinian Releases

  They walked free —yet came home with broken bodies , shattered spirits , and scars that cannot be erased. On October 13, 2025, nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees were released from Israeli custody in return for hostages freed by Hamas. Many rejoiced; families wept with relief. But behind those scenes, a darker story surfaced—one of systemic abuse, medical neglect, and a betrayal of human dignity. The Faces Behind the Numbers Among those finally returned was Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya , a beloved hospital doctor in Gaza, whose ordeal reveals the brutality that many are still too afraid to speak about. He arrived having lost more than 20 kg in just two months , with fractured ribs from interrogation , a worsening heart condition denied proper medical attention , and the scars of solitary confinement and torture. He is not alone. In the landmark “ Welcome to Hell ” report, 55 formerly held Palestinians shared chilling testimonies : starvation diets, savage beatings, r...
Post a Comment
Read more

The World as Gaza: Necropolitics and the Calculus of Survival

  “ The ultimate expression of sovereignty resides in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die.” — Achille Mbembe, “Necropolitics” There are philosophies that dissect history, and there are philosophies that bleed through it. Achille Mbembe’s Necropolitics belongs to the latter — it is not an academic exercise, but a diagnosis of the world’s moral decay. In his words, modern sovereignty is no longer about governing life — it is about managing death . It decides who is allowed to breathe, who must suffocate, and who will exist in the space between. Nowhere is this calculus of death more visible, more technologically refined, and more ethically bankrupt than in Palestine . The siege of Gaza has transformed necropolitics from theory into geography — a place where the architecture of control and the arithmetic of survival intersect. The Right to Kill, the Duty to Let Die In Necropolitics , Mbembe extends Foucault’s biopower — the power to “...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Oppose Annexation Without Actually Opposing It: The Trump Doctrine of Elegant Hypocrisy

  The Art of Saying No While Handing Over the Keys: Trump’s De Facto Annexation Gift to Israel Ah yes — the era of “ principled diplomacy.” The Trump administration, that self-proclaimed guardian of “fairness” in the Middle East, will forever be remembered for its masterclass in political double-speak — a rare performance where the United States verbally opposed Israel’s annexation of the West Bank while physically laying down the red carpet for it. It’s like saying, “ Please, don’t steal the car,” while quietly tossing over the keys, disabling the alarm, and complimenting the thief’s driving skills. The Great Paradox — or Just the Great Performance? Let’s call it what it was: a paradox of diplomacy , or perhaps more accurately , a farce performed for global consumption . In words , the Trump administration urged restraint — telling Netanyahu that annexation should be “coordinated,” “negotiated,” and “timed wisely.” In reality , it was busy dismantling every legal and dip...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Science of Fear: How Islamophobia Became a Campaign Strategy

  When Zohran Mamdani stood before a roaring crowd and declared, “ No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in Islamophobia and win an election,” he wasn’t just celebrating victory — he was delivering a eulogy for a long, poisonous political playbook. Because let’s face it — Islamophobia has never just been about prejudice. It’s been a strategy — polished, funded, and weaponized into one of the most successful vote-getting formulas in modern politics. The Machinery of Fear The arithmetic is simple — and sinister . Take a minority that makes up barely 2% of the U.S. population . Turn them into the symbolic threat for the other 98%. Feed that fear with millions of dollars , wrap it in the flag , and sell it as “security. ” According to a 2021 CAIR report , more than $105 million was funneled to just 26 anti-Muslim organizations between 2017 and 2019 — money laundered through “ mainstream charitable ” institutions. That’s not democracy in action. That’...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Leak That Broke the Mirror: Israel’s Moral Collapse at Sde Teiman

  n R It was not the torture that shocked Israel. It was the fact that someone leaked it. Welcome to Sde Teiman — the desert detention camp that became a mirror to Israel’s moral decay, and to the world’s selective blindness. The Scene of the Crime The story begins, like most horror stories do these days, with a camera. On July 5, 2024, security footage inside the Sde Teiman military base caught what it was never meant to record: a Palestinian prisoner, blindfolded, bound, and dragged across the floor by Israeli soldiers. Moments later, the soldiers raised shields to block the camera — and behind that human wall, the real Israel revealed itself. When the shields dropped , the man lay broken: seven fractured ribs, a punctured lung, and a torn rectum so severe it required surgery and a colostomy. The anatomy of cruelty was complete. The Scandal That Wasn’t You would think such a crime would set off national outrage. But in Israel’s political universe , torture is an...
Post a Comment
Read more