Skip to main content

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.



So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “recognises the State of Palestine.” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption. It’s theatre.

1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration

Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future.

On 2 November 1917, Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared:

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”

Notice that phrase: “civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities”. It’s a clause written in ink on paper. But it never protected much else. Because what followed was displacement, dispossession, marginalisation. The “non-Jewish communities” were never treated as equals. Britain’s promise of “best endeavours” becomes grotesque when civilians become targets, when rights are “prejudiced”, when lives are seen as incidental.

2. Reinventing Complicity: UK Parliamentary Records, Today

Fast forward to today. Recognise Palestine, we do. But let’s look at what Britain is doing while recognition is tagged on like a ribbon.

Below are direct quotes from Hansard debates and recent parliamentary proceedings.

A. Arms Export Licences Debate (12 December 2023)

From Arms Export Licences: Israel:

Zarah Sultana (Coventry South):
“More than 18,000 Palestinians, including more than 7,000 children, have been killed. More than 80% of the population — 1.8 million people — has been displaced. Almost 100 journalists have been killed … Behind those horrifying statistics are real people … getting this debate about getting the Government to commit to ending these arms licences so that we are not complicit in war crimes.”

She also mentioned:
“We know that we have issued arms licences to the Israeli Government worth £474 million since 2015. Included in those licences are parts for F-35 fighter jets — stealth aircraft that are currently unleashing hell on Gaza.”

B. Responses from the Government in that Debate

Greg Hands (Minister for Trade Policy) said:
“We must not forget how this conflict started. … A massacre that rightly appalled the world. Barbarism, brutality and inhumanity are not words that we should use lightly … Israel has a clear right to defend itself, while of course complying with international law. … it is only right that we continue to engage with Israel to ensure that its campaign is targeted against Hamas combatants and military infrastructure.”

Translation: “Yes, people are dying. But we’ll stay engaged with the killer, provided it claims to comply with international law.” As though that breathing, fragile claim gives licence to everything else.

C. Arms & Military Cargo Export Controls (Debate, 2 June 2025)

Steve Witherden (Labour MP) rose in that debate with this indictment:
“Since 7 October, Israel has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians. As a father, the thought of the loss of a single child is heartbreaking; the estimate of more than 50,000 children killed or injured in the Gaza strip is inconceivable.”

Warinder Juss added:
“The exports have included items such as bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and similar munitions of war. … Since October 2023 there have been at least 14 shipments of military goods from the UK to Israel. Those include over 8,500 munitions, bombs, grenades, missiles, and 146 armoured vehicle parts. In October 2023 alone, the UK exported 150,000 bullets.”

D. Government’s Claimed Safeguards

From these debates:

Zarah Sultana asked:
“It is an absolute duty on our Government … where arms or components used in arms are used in violation of international law … there must be an immediate suspension of exports and a review.”

And the response from the Government side:

On 30 November 2023, Secretary of State for Business and Trade said:
“Export licences are kept under careful and continual review as standard, and we are able to amend licences or refuse new licence applications if they are inconsistent with the strategic export licensing criteria.”

3. Piecing It Together: Recognition vs. Action

Now, you have this set of truths:

  • Britain in 1917 promised to “facilitate” a national home for Jewish people in Palestine, while preserving rights of non-Jewish inhabitants. Balfour’s caveat has long been shredded.

  • In 2023-2025, UK Parliament acknowledged arms licences worth hundreds of millions to Israel, F-35 parts, shipments of bombs, grenades, etc., even while thousands of children and civilians are being killed in Gaza.

  • The Government claims constant review, licensing criteria, and international law compliance — but in practice, many of the items exported may well be used in operations in Gaza or against civilians.

  • Recognition of statehood by Britain is being celebrated — yet at the same time, Britain continues to provide the tools of war.

4. Sharpened Sarcasm

Let’s sharpen this:

“We recognise Palestine,” says Britain.
“But we will continue licensing bombs, stealth-fighter parts, surveillance, intelligence, trade in weapon-components, training.”


 

So it recognises, while arming. It recognises, while enabling. It recognises, while profiting, while facilitating, while shielding. It recognises, while the smoke, the ruin, the children’s graveyards pile up.




Recognition without meaningful action? That is complicity. Recognition with a handshake to the killer, while you keep sharpening his knife? That is hypocrisy.

5. What Would True Recognition Look Like

Let this be clear: recognition means nothing unless it is backed by brave, real, painful decisions. These are not soft asks; they are moral imperatives.

  • Immediate suspension of all arms export licences to any end-user in Israel / IDF, especially for items that could or do facilitate operations in Gaza, drone strikes, fighter-aircraft parts, etc.
  • Full transparency in the licensing process, with public disclosure of what is going where, through which companies, who is responsible.
  • Cease intelligence & surveillance support that can be used for targeting Palestinian civilian areas.
  • Stop all military training that enhances operational capacity of units involved in operations in Gaza or the West Bank.
  • Push for independent investigations into alleged violations of international humanitarian law; support accountability via international courts.

6. Conclusion: Britain, You Were There, You’re Still There

Britain lit the fuse:

  • The Balfour Declaration didn’t simply announce support. It planted the seeds of dispossession, displacement, injustice.
  • Under the Mandate, British forces suppressed Palestinian resistance, controlled land, immigration, civil rights.
  • In 1948, Britain’s withdrawal didn’t end the colonial project — it handed over the structure.
  • Since then, Britain has traded with, armed, trained, allied with Israel — even when serious allegations of war crimes stood stand.

Recognising Palestine now without ceasing your role in the machinery of war is like a doctor declaring themselves against sickness while still infecting patients.

Britain is not absolved by wrapping recognition in flowery words. Recognition must mean something. If not, it is just Britain saying: we see the victim, we call them a state — while giving the aggressor tools to kill them longer.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

  There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

  Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...
Post a Comment
Read more