Skip to main content

“Gaza at the Crossroads — Will the 2025 Peace Plan Hold?”



Gaza at the Crossroads — Will the 2025 Peace Plan Hold?

By : Malik Mukhtar, October 2025

Two years into a devastating war, Gaza lies in ruins. The humanitarian catastrophe is staggering: over 66,000 lives lost, tens of thousands more injured, entire neighborhoods turned into rubble. While rockets and tank shells continue to dominate headlines, this past week marked a turning point in diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. A new U.S.-brokered 20-point peace proposal has plunged the region into fresh hope — and renewed debate over whether promises can outpace bullets.


What’s on the Table: The 20-Point Proposal

On September 29, 2025, President Donald Trump unveiled a sweeping 20-point plan to end hostilities in Gaza. Immediately, the plan called for:

  • A ceasefire, freezing conflict lines instantly
  • Hostage returns: within 72 hours, all captives (alive and deceased) released
  • Prisoner swaps: Israel releases 250 life-sentence prisoners and 1,700 Gazans detained since the war began
  • Disarmament of Hamas and dismantling of tunnels, weapons, and militant infrastructure
  • Transitional governance by technocratic Palestinian leadership (explicitly excluding Hamas)
  • International stabilization forces deployed to secure the Gaza Strip during withdrawal
  • Gradual withdrawal of Israeli troops with maintenance of a “security perimeter presence”
  • No annexation: Israel agrees not to annex Gaza under the proposal
  • Humanitarian reconstruction and oversight of rebuilding while population returns

Crucially, the plan hinges on mutual acceptance: hostilities only halt if both sides agree to the terms.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly accepted the plan (with caveats). Hamas, however, is still weighing it. Leading voices in Doha and Gaza suggest they may propose modifications, especially around full Israeli withdrawal and guarantees for their leadership.


Ground Realities: Fighting Through Diplomacy

While negotiators work the backchannels, the war continues in full force:

  • The Israeli military has intensified bombing in Gaza City, severed key corridors, and issued ultimatums for last evacuations.
  • Aid agencies have pulled back from many urban zones due to safety concerns.
  • A flotilla carrying activists and relief goods was intercepted at sea by Israeli naval forces.
  • Gaza’s movement is increasingly restricted: the Sharon corridor and Netzarim corridor closures are cutting off northern and southern zones.

This juxtaposition — of diplomacy and destruction — is the crucible in which any deal must emerge. Every hour of delay deepens despair and raises the risk that even a signed agreement will have no ground to stand on.


What Makes or Breaks a Deal

For the 2025 peace plan to succeed — not just on paper but in practice — several critical elements must be resolved:

  1. Buy-in from Hamas
    They must accept (or at least not reject) the core terms. Even minor amendments — especially over Israeli withdrawal or protection of their leadership — could derail the entire framework.

  2. Credible security guarantees / enforcement
    The stabilization force must be robust, neutral, and empowered. It must provide real oversight over disarmament and prevent spoilers from rearming or ث6undermining the transition.

  3. Clear sequencing and verification
    The order of actions — hostages, withdrawals, governance, reconstruction — must be well defined, not vague clauses. Ambiguity is an invitation for stalling or backsliding.

  4. Reconstruction and humanitarian logistics
    Rebuilding Gaza will require immense funds, materials, manpower, and coordination. Ensuring that aid crosses borders and reaches civilians (not being diverted) is essential.

  5. Public legitimacy
    On both sides — among Israelis and Palestinians — the deal must appear just and sustainable. Otherwise, internal backlash could oust leaders or cripple implementation.

  6. International backing & pressure
    Arab states, the U.N., major powers must not just endorse but help enforce & monitor. Funding, diplomatic pressure, peacekeeping roles all matter.

  7. Contingency mechanisms
    What if one side violates? What happens if violence restarts? The deal must include triggers, arbitration, and consequences, not a fragile handshake.


A Fragile Window — But Not a Guarantee

In the halls of power, diplomats call this a “last window” — a chance to halt irreversible loss before the devastation becomes permanent. But Gaza is already scarred beyond repair in many places. Any deal that fails to stop bombing, displacement, or reconstruction will be seen by many as a hollow peace.

The 2025 plan is bold. It encompasses both the hard security demands of Israel and the demands for Palestinian dignity, return, and rebuilding. But the devil is in the details: sequencing, guarantees, verification, and willingness to act will decide whether it is historic or hollow.

As the world watches, the question is no longer whether a deal can be made — it’s whether it can be kept.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed.

  Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed “ I delivered a beheaded woman who was nine months pregnant. ” That’s not a horror-film script. That’s not medieval history. That is the testimony of an Australian medic standing in a Gaza hospital in 2025, describing what it means to “ practice medicine ” under Israeli bombardment. A nine-months-pregnant woman , decapitated , her body torn open so that the child she carried could be pulled out lifeless — and somehow this is still not enough to shake the comfortable democracies of the West into anything resembling a conscience. We should probably give the Nobel Prize for Creative Euphemism to the politicians who still call this “self-defense.” After all, there’s nothing quite as defensive as severing the head of an expectant mother and forcing foreign doctors to deliver her dead child in the rubble of what used to be a hospital . Bravo, civilization . The tragedy is not just the atrocity itself. It’s the smug perfo...

Docu Drama. The voice of Hind Rajab.

The Red Phone Rings, but the World Hits Mute The world just gave a 23-minute standing ovation —yes, twenty-three full minutes of clapping —for The Voice of Hind Rajab at the Venice Film Festival . Applause so long it could’ve filled Hind’s final desperate phone call to the Red Crescent. Bravo, humanity. We couldn’t save her when it mattered, but at least we can applaud her ghost. This is the new morality play: a five-year-old Palestinian child, trapped in a bullet-riddled car , whispering “please come, I’m scared ,” while surrounded by the corpses of her family. The Red Crescent tried . Paramedics drove toward her and were killed too . Israel buried them in silence . And the “ civilized world ”? It buried her in its news cycle . But now—don’t worry— we have a movie . Starring Hind’s voice. Directed by Kaouther Ben Hania. Produced by an ensemble of Hollywood conscience-bearers : Brad Pitt, Joaquin Phoenix, Rooney Mara, Alfonso Cuarón, Jonathan Glazer, Jemima Khan , and others. ...

The End of Zionism? Welcome to the Funeral Nobody Wants to Admit Is Overdue

  Of course. Haaretz recently published an opinion piece by Ithamar Handelman -Smith titled “ Some Say It’s the End of Zionism, and I Say That’s All Right .” And what impeccable timing: as Israel carries out a near-two-year campaign of siege, famine, and bombardment in Gaza — slaughtering families, burying aid workers with their ambulances, and literally starving children to death — someone in Israel finally whispers the unspeakable: maybe Zionism, that 20th-century project of “ Jewish salvation ,” has outlived its moral shelf life. Bravo. The house is burning, bodies are scattered in the street, and the philosopher shows up with a garden hose . Zionism: Success Story or Crime Scene? Handelman-Smith argues that Zionism achieved its success : a Jewish state, a safe haven, a fortress against the ghosts of Europe’s crimes . But like every “ success story ” drenched in other people’s blood , it didn’t age well. What began as refuge turned into domination; what was called “ ...

Dockers of Conscience: Italy’s Brave Guardians of Gaza

  At a time when most governments avert their eyes , when institutions choose silence over principle, it is often the hands hardened by real work — the hands of dockworkers— that lift the banner of humanity. In Genoa , those hands belong to the members of the Unione Sindacale di Base (USB) and the dockworkers’ collective CALP ( Collettivo Autonomo Lavoratori Portuali ) . These are not new voices. For years they have stood where conscience demands —on the cold concrete of the docks , blocking ships laden with weapons destined for wars , refusing to let Italy’s ports be complicit in bloodshed. USB , born in 2010 out of grassroots struggles , has carried a proud history of international solidarity. Its members have consistently placed labor at the service of justice, from strikes against austerity to protests against militarism . CALP , forged in Genoa’s port , has a more direct history with Palestine: blocking Israeli-bound weapons , organizing boycotts, and declaring, time ...

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.

So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “ recognises the State of Palestine. ” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption . It’s theatre. 1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future. On 2 November 1917 , Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object , it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine , or the rights and political sta...