Skip to main content

Empires’ Regent of Gaza: Tony Blair’s Long March of War Crimes Disguised as Statesmanship.

 


Tony Blair has always enjoyed his favorite costume: the peacemaker. A Nobel-prize smile, a PowerPoint full of “solutions,” and a rolodex of Gulf patrons. But peel back the PR varnish and what remains is one of the most destructive salesmen of war in modern times a man whose policies turned Iraq into rubble, Afghanistan into a graveyard of promises, and who now, with astonishing audacity, is whispered about as the Regent of Gaza.”

Yes, you read that right: the man who sold a lie to Parliament about Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction,” who tied Britain’s destiny to George W. Bush’s cowboy wars, is now being floated as a manager of Gaza’s future. If it weren’t grotesque, it would almost be comic.




Iraq: The War That Had “No Imminent Threat”

The Chilcot Inquiry laid it bare:

  • “When Britain joined the US-led invasion in March 2003, the Iraqi dictator posed no imminent threat’.
  • “Policy on the Iraq invasion was made on the basis of flawed intelligence assessmentsnot challenged, and should have been.”
  • “The scale of the UK effort in post-conflict Iraq never matched the scale of the challenge.”

Translation: Blair  the UK into a war of choice, ignored dissent, parroted dodgy intelligence, and then botched the aftermath.

Chilcot’s conclusion was devastating: Blair was not straight with the nation. Families of the dead soldiers called him a war criminal. Iraqi civilians had no need to read the reporttheir cities and families bore the evidence in real time.

Blair’s own words after the report are almost Shakespearean in their irony: I accept responsibility in fullwithout exception or excuse.” And then, in the next breath: “If I was back in the same place with the same information, I would take the same decision.” A confession and a refusal, rolled into one politician’s shrug.




Afghanistan: The Endless War of Broken Promises

Before Iraq, there was Afghanistan. Blair proudly announced Britain’s role in 2001: There are three parts, all equally important, to the operation … military, diplomatic, and humanitarian. The promise was liberation and reconstruction. The reality was twenty years of destruction.



By 2021, Blair railed against America’s withdrawal, calling it imbecilic — as if the true tragedy wasn’t two decades of shattered lives, but the fact that his precious intervention was finally over.

The numbers are unforgiving:

  • At least 46,000 Afghan civilians killed directly in the war.
  • Up to 170,000 civilian deaths if you count indirect causes.
  • A country left with mass displacement, collapsed health care, and the Taliban back in Kabul.

A “humanitarian coalition”? No — a war that killed more civilians than terrorists, all cheered on by Blair as a junior partner to George W. Bush.


Gaza: The “Technocrat” Sells Stability While Children Starve

And now, Blair resurfaces — not in Baghdad, not in Kabul, but in Gaza. The enclave where hospitals have been leveled, where children are deliberately starved, where entire families are erased in seconds by airstrikes.

Amnesty International:

  • Israel has carried out acts prohibited under the Genocide Convention … with the specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza.”
  • Evidence demonstrates Israel has used starvation of civilians as a weapon of war.”

Human Rights Watch:

  • “This strike inflicted massive civilian casualties without an apparent military target … one of scores of attacks causing overwhelming carnage.”
  • “Israeli forces … have routinely opened fire on starving civiliansserious violations of international law and war crimes.”

And into this living hell, empire sends — Tony Blair. His Tony Blair Institute, flush with Gulf money, sells “development” and “stability packages” that sound more like a corporate rebranding pitch than a liberation strategy. Food, medicine, electricity? Maybe — if Palestinians surrender politics, agency, and dignity in return.


The Pattern: Disaster as a Business Model

The pattern is unmistakable:

  • Iraq: invent a threat, invade, profit from “post-war solutions.”
  • Afghanistan: partner in occupation, then lecture the world when it collapses.
  • Gaza: propose to manage the ruins, as though the blood of children can be administrated like a consultancy portfolio.


Blair’s genius is not statecraft. It is marketing catastrophe as governance.


The Climax: Regent of Gaza

And here is the climax of this sordid drama: Tony Blair, a man accused by his own people of war crimes, condemned by inquiry after inquiry, haunted by the ghosts of Iraq and Afghanistan, is now being whispered about as the Regent of Gaza.

A war criminal elevated as a peace manager. A salesman of empire given the keys to a caged people. A man whose “humanitarian coalitions” left only body counts, now dressing Gaza’s genocide in the language of “post-war solutions.”

It is not just shameful. It is obscene. Gaza does not need a Regent. Gaza needs freedom, justice, and the end of manufactured catastrophes sold as “necessary wars.”



History will not remember Blair as a peacemaker. It will remember him as a grinning technocrat of empire — a man who followed Bush into hell, and now wants to sell Gaza the ashes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed.

  Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed “ I delivered a beheaded woman who was nine months pregnant. ” That’s not a horror-film script. That’s not medieval history. That is the testimony of an Australian medic standing in a Gaza hospital in 2025, describing what it means to “ practice medicine ” under Israeli bombardment. A nine-months-pregnant woman , decapitated , her body torn open so that the child she carried could be pulled out lifeless — and somehow this is still not enough to shake the comfortable democracies of the West into anything resembling a conscience. We should probably give the Nobel Prize for Creative Euphemism to the politicians who still call this “self-defense.” After all, there’s nothing quite as defensive as severing the head of an expectant mother and forcing foreign doctors to deliver her dead child in the rubble of what used to be a hospital . Bravo, civilization . The tragedy is not just the atrocity itself. It’s the smug perfo...

Docu Drama. The voice of Hind Rajab.

The Red Phone Rings, but the World Hits Mute The world just gave a 23-minute standing ovation —yes, twenty-three full minutes of clapping —for The Voice of Hind Rajab at the Venice Film Festival . Applause so long it could’ve filled Hind’s final desperate phone call to the Red Crescent. Bravo, humanity. We couldn’t save her when it mattered, but at least we can applaud her ghost. This is the new morality play: a five-year-old Palestinian child, trapped in a bullet-riddled car , whispering “please come, I’m scared ,” while surrounded by the corpses of her family. The Red Crescent tried . Paramedics drove toward her and were killed too . Israel buried them in silence . And the “ civilized world ”? It buried her in its news cycle . But now—don’t worry— we have a movie . Starring Hind’s voice. Directed by Kaouther Ben Hania. Produced by an ensemble of Hollywood conscience-bearers : Brad Pitt, Joaquin Phoenix, Rooney Mara, Alfonso Cuarón, Jonathan Glazer, Jemima Khan , and others. ...

The End of Zionism? Welcome to the Funeral Nobody Wants to Admit Is Overdue

  Of course. Haaretz recently published an opinion piece by Ithamar Handelman -Smith titled “ Some Say It’s the End of Zionism, and I Say That’s All Right .” And what impeccable timing: as Israel carries out a near-two-year campaign of siege, famine, and bombardment in Gaza — slaughtering families, burying aid workers with their ambulances, and literally starving children to death — someone in Israel finally whispers the unspeakable: maybe Zionism, that 20th-century project of “ Jewish salvation ,” has outlived its moral shelf life. Bravo. The house is burning, bodies are scattered in the street, and the philosopher shows up with a garden hose . Zionism: Success Story or Crime Scene? Handelman-Smith argues that Zionism achieved its success : a Jewish state, a safe haven, a fortress against the ghosts of Europe’s crimes . But like every “ success story ” drenched in other people’s blood , it didn’t age well. What began as refuge turned into domination; what was called “ ...

Dockers of Conscience: Italy’s Brave Guardians of Gaza

  At a time when most governments avert their eyes , when institutions choose silence over principle, it is often the hands hardened by real work — the hands of dockworkers— that lift the banner of humanity. In Genoa , those hands belong to the members of the Unione Sindacale di Base (USB) and the dockworkers’ collective CALP ( Collettivo Autonomo Lavoratori Portuali ) . These are not new voices. For years they have stood where conscience demands —on the cold concrete of the docks , blocking ships laden with weapons destined for wars , refusing to let Italy’s ports be complicit in bloodshed. USB , born in 2010 out of grassroots struggles , has carried a proud history of international solidarity. Its members have consistently placed labor at the service of justice, from strikes against austerity to protests against militarism . CALP , forged in Genoa’s port , has a more direct history with Palestine: blocking Israeli-bound weapons , organizing boycotts, and declaring, time ...

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.

So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “ recognises the State of Palestine. ” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption . It’s theatre. 1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future. On 2 November 1917 , Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object , it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine , or the rights and political sta...