Skip to main content

It Is Genocide — A Reckoning We Can’t Ignore. O Ed



Bernie Sanders’ words landed like a thunderclap: “The intent is clear. The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” Those tenacious, terrible words—published on September 17, 2025—are not a rhetorical flourish. They are the alarm bell of a democracy’s conscience, sounding in the face of overwhelming evidence and unbearable human suffering.^1

We must start by refusing the 900 numbness that lets statistics pass as background noise. Out of a population of roughly 2.2 million people, tens of thousands are dead, many more wounded, and whole neighborhoods have been flattened.^2 Children who once ran through alleys and sat in schoolrooms are now counted among the nameless dead. Hospitals, schools, water and sanitation systems — the scaffolding of daily life — lie in ruin. These are not the accidental byproducts of war; they are the very conditions that, by law and by conscience, define an effort to destroy a people’s ability to survive.^3



Sanders does something too many politicians shy away from: he names reality. He begins by acknowledging fact—the horror of the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023—and the legitimate right of a nation to defend itself. But naming legitimate defense is not the same as whitewashing a campaign of starvation, bombing, and systemic destruction that has been documented by human-rights organizations, Israeli groups, and a United Nations commission.^4 These institutions, from B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel to Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, do not use the word genocide lightly.^5 Neither did the UN experts whose recent report reached the same legal conclusion.^6

Imagine a child with the light in her eyes slowly dimming because there is no food, no medicine, no clean water. Imagine parents forced to choose which child gets the last morsel, or to bury a sibling in silence because there is no way to rescue the body from the rubble. We are not talking about abstractions or remote numbers; we are talking about mothers, fathers, elders, and children whose futures have been erased. When a government systematically denies fuel for hospitals, blocks lifesaving aid, and levels the places where people live, it does not matter what euphemism is used—the human calculus is the same: people are being killed, starved, and pushed from the face of their homes.^7


"Denying fuel, blocking aid, leveling homes — the result is the same: people killed, starved, erased"




Sanders also pulls back the curtain on intent — the legal heart of the matter. Words by policymakers and ministers matter. When officials speak of flattening cities, when they call Gaza “human animals,” when they celebrate the prospect of erasing an entire place from the map, those words are not mere rhetoric; they are evidence for prosecutors and historians alike.^8 Intent can be gleaned from policy choices as much as from speeches: blockade after blockade, the denial of aid, the targeting of infrastructure that sustains life. Put together, the picture is ugly and unmistakable.^9



What follows must be action—not performative gestures but real leverage. Sanders calls for an immediate ceasefire, an end to offensive U.S. arms sales to Israel, a massive surge of humanitarian aid channeled through the UN, and concrete steps toward Palestinian self-determination.^10 These are not partisan demands; they are the moral minimum. If our commitment to human decency means anything, it means using the political, economic, and diplomatic tools at our disposal to stop the killing and to ensure accountability.



To those who will recoil from the word “genocide” because of fear or politics, I say this: naming the crime does not deny complexity. It clarifies responsibility. It opens the path to justice, and it refuses the slow slide into normalizing the unthinkable. The memory of past genocides demands that we speak plainly now—because silence will be judged more harshly than any mistake of language.^11



Read Sanders’ op-ed. Hear the voices of the living and the dead. Then ask yourself what you are willing to do to stop this. A country that calls itself moral cannot shrug away from children starving in real time. We can argue about geopolitics until the next election cycle, or we can choose humanity now.



If we choose the latter, history will remember that we acted when the lamp of civilization flickered. If we fail, history will remember that we watched the lamp gutter out. The choice is ours.




(This post draws on Senator Bernie Sanders’ op-ed “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, and reporting from major international outlets and human-rights organizations.)



Footnotes

  1. Bernie Sanders, “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, Office of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
  2. Ibid.
  3. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Humanitarian Situation Report: Gaza, 2025.
  4. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  5. Amnesty International, Israel/OPT: Evidence of War Crimes in Gaza, 2024; Human Rights Watch, Israel/Palestine: Pattern of War Crimes, 2024.
  6. United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Report, September 2025.
  7. World Food Programme (WFP), Gaza Emergency Update, 2025.
  8. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  9. B’Tselem, This Is Genocide: Israel’s Assault on Gaza, 2025.
  10. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  11. Omer Bartov, “I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It,” New York Times, July 18, 2025.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Crusaders Go Digital: Old Wars, New Costumes, Same Bloodlust

History, it seems, has developed a dark sense of humor. After centuries of reflection, scholarship, and solemn declarations of “never again,” we now find elected officials—armed not with swords but with AI filters —cosplaying as Crusaders . Progress , apparently, means upgrading from iron armor to algorithmic propaganda. Let’s begin where this story actually starts—not in Washington, not in Tel Aviv, but nearly a thousand years ago, when Europe launched what it called “holy wars.” ⚔️ The Original Crusades: A Brief Reminder The Crusades (1095–1291) were not a single war but a series of campaigns initiated after Pope Urban II’s call at Clermont in 1095. His message was simple and devastatingly effective: reclaim Jerusalem, and God will reward you. What followed was not a clean clash of armies, but waves of violence that engulfed entire regions—from France and Germany through Hungary, into Byzantium, Antioch, and Palestine. Historians caution that medieval records are fragmented, but acro...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War That Wins on Paper—and Bleeds in Reality

  The War That Always Works—Until It Doesn’t There is a certain elegance to modern war. Not the destruction. Not the bodies. But the presentation . The language is always impeccable: “ Strategic degradation” “Precision targeting” “Limited objectives” It almost sounds like a policy workshop — not the opening act of something that may consume an entire region. And once again, the script is being rehearsed. Iran is “weakened.” Its systems are “degraded.” Its options are “limited.” And somewhere between these carefully chosen words, a very old idea quietly returns: Maybe this time, we finish it. Chapter One: The Seduction of Air Power Airstrikes are irresistible. They promise control without commitment. Dominance without vulnerability. Victory without presence. You can bomb a country… without ever having to meet it . No dialects to understand. No terrain to navigate. No জনগোষ্ঠী to confront. Just coordinates. And for a brief moment— it feels like war ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

  There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...
Post a Comment
Read more

Morality Compass? Or a Weapon of Convenience

There is something almost poetic about the sudden rediscovery of morality in war. Not morality itself. Not restraint. But the language of it. Because today, we are told—once again—that there are limits. That civilians matter. That infrastructure must not be touched. And yet, at the very same moment, Donald Trump openly threatens to “ obliterate” Iran’s infrastructure —including electric grids and water desalination plants , the very systems that keep millions alive. Water. Electricity. The basic architecture of survival . Not hidden in classified documents. Not whispered behind closed doors. But declared—casually, publicly, almost theatrically. So let’s ask again: Where exactly is this moral compass? Because if destroying water systems—knowing it will deprive civilians of drinking water—is not crossing a line, then perhaps the line was never there. Legal experts are not confused about this. Targeting such infrastructure is widely considered prohibited under internatio...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the System Is Questioned by Its Own Guardians. A Warning Israel Can’t Dismiss.

  When the Warning Comes From Within There are moments in history when criticism from the outside can be dismissed—but when it comes from within, it becomes something far more dangerous: a mirror. That is what makes the recent letter by the The London Initiative so unsettling. Jewish philanthropists. Rabbis. Community leaders. Not critics of Israel—but voices shaped by it—now warning Isaac Herzog that something has gone terribly wrong. Their charge is stark: extremist settler violence is no longer fringe— it is becoming normalized. The Numbers That Refuse to Stay Quiet This is not rhetoric. It is data. Israeli military data (reported by Haaretz ) shows settler attacks rose by 25% in 2025 845 attacks in 2025 alone , injuring around 200 Palestinians Since October 2023: over 1,700 recorded settler attacks Early 2026: an average of 4 incidents per day And according to the United Nations and field reporting: Hundreds of Palestinians injured already in 2026 Entire ...
Post a Comment
Read more