Skip to main content

It Is Genocide — A Reckoning We Can’t Ignore. O Ed



Bernie Sanders’ words landed like a thunderclap: “The intent is clear. The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” Those tenacious, terrible words—published on September 17, 2025—are not a rhetorical flourish. They are the alarm bell of a democracy’s conscience, sounding in the face of overwhelming evidence and unbearable human suffering.^1

We must start by refusing the 900 numbness that lets statistics pass as background noise. Out of a population of roughly 2.2 million people, tens of thousands are dead, many more wounded, and whole neighborhoods have been flattened.^2 Children who once ran through alleys and sat in schoolrooms are now counted among the nameless dead. Hospitals, schools, water and sanitation systems — the scaffolding of daily life — lie in ruin. These are not the accidental byproducts of war; they are the very conditions that, by law and by conscience, define an effort to destroy a people’s ability to survive.^3



Sanders does something too many politicians shy away from: he names reality. He begins by acknowledging fact—the horror of the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023—and the legitimate right of a nation to defend itself. But naming legitimate defense is not the same as whitewashing a campaign of starvation, bombing, and systemic destruction that has been documented by human-rights organizations, Israeli groups, and a United Nations commission.^4 These institutions, from B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel to Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, do not use the word genocide lightly.^5 Neither did the UN experts whose recent report reached the same legal conclusion.^6

Imagine a child with the light in her eyes slowly dimming because there is no food, no medicine, no clean water. Imagine parents forced to choose which child gets the last morsel, or to bury a sibling in silence because there is no way to rescue the body from the rubble. We are not talking about abstractions or remote numbers; we are talking about mothers, fathers, elders, and children whose futures have been erased. When a government systematically denies fuel for hospitals, blocks lifesaving aid, and levels the places where people live, it does not matter what euphemism is used—the human calculus is the same: people are being killed, starved, and pushed from the face of their homes.^7


"Denying fuel, blocking aid, leveling homes — the result is the same: people killed, starved, erased"




Sanders also pulls back the curtain on intent — the legal heart of the matter. Words by policymakers and ministers matter. When officials speak of flattening cities, when they call Gaza “human animals,” when they celebrate the prospect of erasing an entire place from the map, those words are not mere rhetoric; they are evidence for prosecutors and historians alike.^8 Intent can be gleaned from policy choices as much as from speeches: blockade after blockade, the denial of aid, the targeting of infrastructure that sustains life. Put together, the picture is ugly and unmistakable.^9



What follows must be action—not performative gestures but real leverage. Sanders calls for an immediate ceasefire, an end to offensive U.S. arms sales to Israel, a massive surge of humanitarian aid channeled through the UN, and concrete steps toward Palestinian self-determination.^10 These are not partisan demands; they are the moral minimum. If our commitment to human decency means anything, it means using the political, economic, and diplomatic tools at our disposal to stop the killing and to ensure accountability.



To those who will recoil from the word “genocide” because of fear or politics, I say this: naming the crime does not deny complexity. It clarifies responsibility. It opens the path to justice, and it refuses the slow slide into normalizing the unthinkable. The memory of past genocides demands that we speak plainly now—because silence will be judged more harshly than any mistake of language.^11



Read Sanders’ op-ed. Hear the voices of the living and the dead. Then ask yourself what you are willing to do to stop this. A country that calls itself moral cannot shrug away from children starving in real time. We can argue about geopolitics until the next election cycle, or we can choose humanity now.



If we choose the latter, history will remember that we acted when the lamp of civilization flickered. If we fail, history will remember that we watched the lamp gutter out. The choice is ours.




(This post draws on Senator Bernie Sanders’ op-ed “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, and reporting from major international outlets and human-rights organizations.)



Footnotes

  1. Bernie Sanders, “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, Office of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
  2. Ibid.
  3. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Humanitarian Situation Report: Gaza, 2025.
  4. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  5. Amnesty International, Israel/OPT: Evidence of War Crimes in Gaza, 2024; Human Rights Watch, Israel/Palestine: Pattern of War Crimes, 2024.
  6. United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Report, September 2025.
  7. World Food Programme (WFP), Gaza Emergency Update, 2025.
  8. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  9. B’Tselem, This Is Genocide: Israel’s Assault on Gaza, 2025.
  10. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  11. Omer Bartov, “I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It,” New York Times, July 18, 2025.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Price Tag Attackers: Extremist Settler Violence in the West Bank.

  Year-by-year breakdown of documented " Price Tag" attacks in the West Bank and Israel , based on reports from UN OCHA , B’Tselem , Yesh Din , and Israeli media (Haaretz, Times of Israel). Introduction to "Price Tag" Attackers  "Price Tag" attackers are extremist Israeli settlers , primarily affiliated with radical right-wing groups, who carry out violent acts agains Palestinians, Israeli security forces, and left-wing activists  in retaliation for perceived threats to Jewish settlements in the West Bank . The term refers to the " price " they seek to impose for actions like outpost demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Israelis.   - Vandalism, arson, or violence by extremist settlers against Palestinians, Israeli security forces, or left-wing activists.      - Often involves graffiti (e.g., "Price Tag," "Revenge," or "Arabs Out").     - Retaliation for Palestinian attacks, outpost demolitions, or Israeli gover...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Politicization of Antisemitism: Randy Fine, AIPAC, and the Fight Over Anti-Israel Speech

  Randy Fine.  Brief introduction of Randy Fine.  Randy Fine is a U.S. Representative-Elect for Florida's 6th Congressional District and a former Florida State Senator . Born on April 20, 1974, in Tucson , Arizona , Fine holds degrees from Harvard College and Harvard Business School . He began his political career in 2016 as a member of the Florida House of Representatives and later served in the Florida Senate. Fine is known for his strong pro-Israel stance, earning him the nickname " Hebrew Hammer, " and his socially conservative views . He has been involved in contentious legislation and has faced both support and criticism for his policies and rhetoric. Detailed overview of Randy Fine 's stance and legislative efforts related to criminalizing the distribution of anti-Israel flyers, along with broader context about his political agenda and controversies : --- 1. Randy Fine’s Legislative Efforts Against Anti-Israel Flyers - Florida’s Hate Crime Law (2023): ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Media Sold the War. We Watched It Happen.

What Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide reveals—and what the question of digital witnessing forces us to confront There is a disturbing question at the heart of the Gaza catastrophe that cannot be answered simply by asking what governments did, what armies did, or even what the media reported. There is another question: What did the world do while watching? Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide: The Media’s Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza, published by Pluto Press, approaches Gaza through the machinery of mainstream American media. His investigation examines how some of the most influential institutions in the Western information system—including The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC—framed the destruction of Gaza. It is an important question because wars are not fought only with weapons. They are also fought through language. Before bombs become statistics, they become headlines. Before civilian deaths become numbers, they become narratives. Before dest...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Price of Their Silence: How Islamophobia Became an Industry—and Muslims Its Global Collateral

  🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 28, 2025 They bombed Iraq for democracy. Tortured Afghans in the name of security. Waterboarded bodies at Guantanamo and called it “enhanced interrogation.” And now in Gaza—they bury children under rubble and whisper, self-defense . This isn’t a war on terror. It’s a war on memory, on names, on brown bodies that pray in Arabic. And Islamophobia has been its golden engine—powerful, profitable, and protected. 🧠 Islamophobia: Not Just Prejudice—A $Billions Industry Islamophobia is not just a bias—it’s a well-funded psychological operation . According to the Center for American Progress , over $42 million was channeled (2001–2011) into think tanks and media fronts to craft and normalize anti-Muslim sentiment. This isn’t random—it’s strategic. The goal: keep the public afraid —of Muslims, of mosques, of immigrants, of something called Sharia Law . 📘 Sharia Law: The Manufactured Threat That Never Was Let’s be c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Zionism, Antisemitism — and the Grotesque Death of a Political Theology

  If you ever wanted to witness how confusion, opportunism, theology, nationalism, and bigotry collide in real time — you didn’t need a medieval church council. You only needed to tune into a meeting of the . There, amid political loyalists and pop-culture appointees, a spectacle unfolded: Zionism was denounced, antisemitic conspiracies were flirted with, and centuries-old theological errors were recycled as if they were fresh revelations. But the deeper issue is not one controversial appointee. The deeper issue is this: What precisely is Zionism? And how does it intersect — or collide — with antisemitism? Because in today’s discourse, the two are either falsely merged or lazily separated without thought. Let us disentangle them carefully. 1. What Is Zionism — Precisely? Zionism , in its original and political form, is a 19th-century nationalist movement. It emerged in Europe not from theology, but from crisis. The father of modern political Zionism, , was not respon...
Post a Comment
Read more