Skip to main content

It Is Genocide — A Reckoning We Can’t Ignore. O Ed



Bernie Sanders’ words landed like a thunderclap: “The intent is clear. The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” Those tenacious, terrible words—published on September 17, 2025—are not a rhetorical flourish. They are the alarm bell of a democracy’s conscience, sounding in the face of overwhelming evidence and unbearable human suffering.^1

We must start by refusing the 900 numbness that lets statistics pass as background noise. Out of a population of roughly 2.2 million people, tens of thousands are dead, many more wounded, and whole neighborhoods have been flattened.^2 Children who once ran through alleys and sat in schoolrooms are now counted among the nameless dead. Hospitals, schools, water and sanitation systems — the scaffolding of daily life — lie in ruin. These are not the accidental byproducts of war; they are the very conditions that, by law and by conscience, define an effort to destroy a people’s ability to survive.^3



Sanders does something too many politicians shy away from: he names reality. He begins by acknowledging fact—the horror of the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023—and the legitimate right of a nation to defend itself. But naming legitimate defense is not the same as whitewashing a campaign of starvation, bombing, and systemic destruction that has been documented by human-rights organizations, Israeli groups, and a United Nations commission.^4 These institutions, from B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel to Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, do not use the word genocide lightly.^5 Neither did the UN experts whose recent report reached the same legal conclusion.^6

Imagine a child with the light in her eyes slowly dimming because there is no food, no medicine, no clean water. Imagine parents forced to choose which child gets the last morsel, or to bury a sibling in silence because there is no way to rescue the body from the rubble. We are not talking about abstractions or remote numbers; we are talking about mothers, fathers, elders, and children whose futures have been erased. When a government systematically denies fuel for hospitals, blocks lifesaving aid, and levels the places where people live, it does not matter what euphemism is used—the human calculus is the same: people are being killed, starved, and pushed from the face of their homes.^7


"Denying fuel, blocking aid, leveling homes — the result is the same: people killed, starved, erased"




Sanders also pulls back the curtain on intent — the legal heart of the matter. Words by policymakers and ministers matter. When officials speak of flattening cities, when they call Gaza “human animals,” when they celebrate the prospect of erasing an entire place from the map, those words are not mere rhetoric; they are evidence for prosecutors and historians alike.^8 Intent can be gleaned from policy choices as much as from speeches: blockade after blockade, the denial of aid, the targeting of infrastructure that sustains life. Put together, the picture is ugly and unmistakable.^9



What follows must be action—not performative gestures but real leverage. Sanders calls for an immediate ceasefire, an end to offensive U.S. arms sales to Israel, a massive surge of humanitarian aid channeled through the UN, and concrete steps toward Palestinian self-determination.^10 These are not partisan demands; they are the moral minimum. If our commitment to human decency means anything, it means using the political, economic, and diplomatic tools at our disposal to stop the killing and to ensure accountability.



To those who will recoil from the word “genocide” because of fear or politics, I say this: naming the crime does not deny complexity. It clarifies responsibility. It opens the path to justice, and it refuses the slow slide into normalizing the unthinkable. The memory of past genocides demands that we speak plainly now—because silence will be judged more harshly than any mistake of language.^11



Read Sanders’ op-ed. Hear the voices of the living and the dead. Then ask yourself what you are willing to do to stop this. A country that calls itself moral cannot shrug away from children starving in real time. We can argue about geopolitics until the next election cycle, or we can choose humanity now.



If we choose the latter, history will remember that we acted when the lamp of civilization flickered. If we fail, history will remember that we watched the lamp gutter out. The choice is ours.




(This post draws on Senator Bernie Sanders’ op-ed “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, and reporting from major international outlets and human-rights organizations.)



Footnotes

  1. Bernie Sanders, “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, Office of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
  2. Ibid.
  3. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Humanitarian Situation Report: Gaza, 2025.
  4. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  5. Amnesty International, Israel/OPT: Evidence of War Crimes in Gaza, 2024; Human Rights Watch, Israel/Palestine: Pattern of War Crimes, 2024.
  6. United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Report, September 2025.
  7. World Food Programme (WFP), Gaza Emergency Update, 2025.
  8. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  9. B’Tselem, This Is Genocide: Israel’s Assault on Gaza, 2025.
  10. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  11. Omer Bartov, “I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It,” New York Times, July 18, 2025.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When the President Sounds the Alarm, But the Government Looks Away.

A President's Moral Warning Israeli presidents traditionally avoid political confrontation. Their role is largely ceremonial and symbolic, intended to unify rather than divide. Yet Herzog chose to speak openly about something many observers have documented for years: the erosion of moral restraints. His language was unusually severe. Warning of what he called " a terrible process of brutalization " within Israeli society, Herzog lamented that " there are segments among us that are barely shocked by violence anymore " while " certain other segments treat it lightly." Perhaps most alarming was his warning that extremist conduct is no longer confined to society's fringes. Such behavior, he said, is " threatening to enter the mainstream ." The significance of the speech lies not merely in what was said, but in who said it. When a country's ceremonial head of state feels compelled to warn that brutality is becoming normalized, the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

From Karachi to the Palestine Book Awards: The Journey of The Livestreamed Genocide.

Honored to share that my latest work, The Livestreamed Genocide: A Civilization That Watched and Scrorrlled, has officially been submitted for consideration for the 2026 . 🇵🇸📚 Today, the physical manuscripts of the five-volume series were formally dispatched from Karachi to the distinguished judging panel in London and the United States as part of the awards review process. This project was written as both a historical chronicle and a moral inquiry into the age of digital witnessing — an era in which atrocities are no longer hidden from the world, yet are consumed in real time through screens, timelines, and livestreams. Grounded in documented evidence, authenticated sources, and extensive independent research, the series examines the relationship between modern media, public consciousness, political silence, and the normalization of suffering in the digital age. This work was researched, written, compiled, edited, and prepared independently over countless long days and nights....
Post a Comment
Read more

When Violence Becomes the Language of the State Israel’s Internal Crisis and the Brutality Long Normalized in the West Bank

  The image of prosecutor Salah Khalil Na’ameh’s battered face shocked many Israelis because it shattered a dangerous illusion: that state violence lmk can remain confined to Palestinians indefinitely without eventually consuming Israeli society itself. For Palestinians, especially in the occupied West Bank, such scenes are tragically familiar. A man beaten bloody by armed forces. Masked officers storming homes. Security forces accused of fabricating narratives later contradicted by video evidence. Citizens pleading for protection while police either stand aside or participate. What shocked many Israelis was not merely the brutality itself — but the identity of the victim. Na’ameh was not a villager from Hebron or a shepherd from Masafer Yatta. He was an Arab citizen of Israel. A state prosecutor. A man who worked within the Israeli legal system itself. And even he allegedly found himself helpless before a police force critics increasingly describe as politicized, radicaliz...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Humanity Becomes Illegal The kidnapping of conscience on the high seas

  History will remember many crimes of this age. It will remember the bombs . It will remember the starvation . It will remember children pulled from rubble in pieces small enough to fit in their fathers’ hands. But history will also remember something colder, uglier, and perhaps more damning: It will remember how compassion itself was hunted down. Not long ago, the language of the West was filled with grand declarations: rule of law, human rights, international order, civilized values. Today those words hang like burnt banners over a moral wasteland. In international waters near Crete, a humanitarian flotilla carrying activists attempting to challenge the siege of Gaza was intercepted. More than 170 activists were detained. Most were released. But two men — Thiago Avila and Saif Abu Keshek — were taken away into Israeli custody, accused of aiding “the enemy,” while governments in Spain and Brazil demanded their release. Read that again. Not arms traffickers. N...
Post a Comment
Read more

At 78, a Nation at War With Itself

There is a haunting irony in watching a state built on the promise of refuge become trapped in fear of its own reflection. For decades, **** was one of the men entrusted with Israel’s sword — soldier, commander, prime minister, architect of its security doctrine. Not a radical voice. Not an outsider. Not a dissident shouting from the margins. An insider. And when insiders begin speaking the language of alarm, history listens differently . His warning is not that Israel may be destroyed by rockets, tunnels, militias, or regional enemies. His warning is more unsettling: that Israel may survive every external war — and lose itself from within. That is a far more tragic form of defeat. A nation can repel missiles and still watch its institutions hollow out . A nation can dominate battlefields and still become morally exhausted. A nation can claim victory abroad while quietly burying democracy at home . This is the paradox now confronting Israel at 78: militarily formidable, technologic...
Post a Comment
Read more