Skip to main content

It Is Genocide — A Reckoning We Can’t Ignore. O Ed



Bernie Sanders’ words landed like a thunderclap: The intent is clear. The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Those tenacious, terrible words—published on September 17, 2025—are not a rhetorical flourish. They are the alarm bell of a democracy’s conscience, sounding in the face of overwhelming evidence and unbearable human suffering.^1

We must start by refusing the 900 numbness that lets statistics pass as background noise. Out of a population of roughly 2.2 million people, tens of thousands are dead, many more wounded, and whole neighborhoods have been flattened.^2 Children who once ran through alleys and sat in schoolrooms are now counted among the nameless dead. Hospitals, schools, water and sanitation systems — the scaffolding of daily lifelie in ruin. These are not the accidental byproducts of war; they are the very conditions that, by law and by conscience, define an effort to destroy a people’s ability to survive.^3



Sanders does something too many politicians shy away from: he names reality. He begins by acknowledging fact—the horror of the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023—and the legitimate right of a nation to defend itself. But naming legitimate defense is not the same as whitewashing a campaign of starvation, bombing, and systemic destruction that has been documented by human-rights organizations, Israeli groups, and a United Nations commission.^4 These institutions, from B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel to Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, do not use the word genocide lightly.^5 Neither did the UN experts whose recent report reached the same legal conclusion.^6

Imagine a child with the light in her eyes slowly dimming because there is no food, no medicine, no clean water. Imagine parents forced to choose which child gets the last morsel, or to bury a sibling in silence because there is no way to rescue the body from the rubble. We are not talking about abstractions or remote numbers; we are talking about mothers, fathers, elders, and children whose futures have been erased. When a government systematically denies fuel for hospitals, blocks lifesaving aid, and levels the places where people live, it does not matter what euphemism is used—the human calculus is the same: people are being killed, starved, and pushed from the face of their homes.^7


"Denying fuel, blocking aid, leveling homes — the result is the same: people killed, starved, erased"




Sanders also pulls back the curtain on intent — the legal heart of the matter. Words by policymakers and ministers matter. When officials speak of flattening cities, when they call Gaza “human animals,” when they celebrate the prospect of erasing an entire place from the map, those words are not mere rhetoric; they are evidence for prosecutors and historians alike.^8 Intent can be gleaned from policy choices as much as from speeches: blockade after blockade, the denial of aid, the targeting of infrastructure that sustains life. Put together, the picture is ugly and unmistakable.^9



What follows must be actionnot performative gestures but real leverage. Sanders calls for an immediate ceasefire, an end to offensive U.S. arms sales to Israel, a massive surge of humanitarian aid channeled through the UN, and concrete steps toward Palestinian self-determination.^10 These are not partisan demands; they are the moral minimum. If our commitment to human decency means anything, it means using the political, economic, and diplomatic tools at our disposal to stop the killing and to ensure accountability.



To those who will recoil from the word “genocidebecause of fear or politics, I say this: naming the crime does not deny complexity. It clarifies responsibility. It opens the path to justice, and it refuses the slow slide into normalizing the unthinkable. The memory of past genocides demands that we speak plainly now—because silence will be judged more harshly than any mistake of language.^11



Read Sanders’ op-ed. Hear the voices of the living and the dead. Then ask yourself what you are willing to do to stop this. A country that calls itself moral cannot shrug away from children starving in real time. We can argue about geopolitics until the next election cycle, or we can choose humanity now.



If we choose the latter, history will remember that we acted when the lamp of civilization flickered. If we fail, history will remember that we watched the lamp gutter out. The choice is ours.





(This post draws on Senator Bernie Sanders’ op-ed “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, and reporting from major international outlets and human-rights organizations.)




Footnotes

  1. Bernie Sanders, “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, Office of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
  2. Ibid.
  3. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Humanitarian Situation Report: Gaza, 2025.
  4. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  5. Amnesty International, Israel/OPT: Evidence of War Crimes in Gaza, 2024; Human Rights Watch, Israel/Palestine: Pattern of War Crimes, 2024.
  6. United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Report, September 2025.
  7. World Food Programme (WFP), Gaza Emergency Update, 2025.
  8. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  9. B’Tselem, This Is Genocide: Israel’s Assault on Gaza, 2025.
  10. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  11. Omer Bartov, “I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It,” New York Times, July 18, 2025.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...