Skip to main content

It Is Genocide — A Reckoning We Can’t Ignore. O Ed



Bernie Sanders’ words landed like a thunderclap: “The intent is clear. The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.” Those tenacious, terrible words—published on September 17, 2025—are not a rhetorical flourish. They are the alarm bell of a democracy’s conscience, sounding in the face of overwhelming evidence and unbearable human suffering.^1

We must start by refusing the 900 numbness that lets statistics pass as background noise. Out of a population of roughly 2.2 million people, tens of thousands are dead, many more wounded, and whole neighborhoods have been flattened.^2 Children who once ran through alleys and sat in schoolrooms are now counted among the nameless dead. Hospitals, schools, water and sanitation systems — the scaffolding of daily life — lie in ruin. These are not the accidental byproducts of war; they are the very conditions that, by law and by conscience, define an effort to destroy a people’s ability to survive.^3



Sanders does something too many politicians shy away from: he names reality. He begins by acknowledging fact—the horror of the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023—and the legitimate right of a nation to defend itself. But naming legitimate defense is not the same as whitewashing a campaign of starvation, bombing, and systemic destruction that has been documented by human-rights organizations, Israeli groups, and a United Nations commission.^4 These institutions, from B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel to Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, do not use the word genocide lightly.^5 Neither did the UN experts whose recent report reached the same legal conclusion.^6

Imagine a child with the light in her eyes slowly dimming because there is no food, no medicine, no clean water. Imagine parents forced to choose which child gets the last morsel, or to bury a sibling in silence because there is no way to rescue the body from the rubble. We are not talking about abstractions or remote numbers; we are talking about mothers, fathers, elders, and children whose futures have been erased. When a government systematically denies fuel for hospitals, blocks lifesaving aid, and levels the places where people live, it does not matter what euphemism is used—the human calculus is the same: people are being killed, starved, and pushed from the face of their homes.^7


"Denying fuel, blocking aid, leveling homes — the result is the same: people killed, starved, erased"




Sanders also pulls back the curtain on intent — the legal heart of the matter. Words by policymakers and ministers matter. When officials speak of flattening cities, when they call Gaza “human animals,” when they celebrate the prospect of erasing an entire place from the map, those words are not mere rhetoric; they are evidence for prosecutors and historians alike.^8 Intent can be gleaned from policy choices as much as from speeches: blockade after blockade, the denial of aid, the targeting of infrastructure that sustains life. Put together, the picture is ugly and unmistakable.^9



What follows must be action—not performative gestures but real leverage. Sanders calls for an immediate ceasefire, an end to offensive U.S. arms sales to Israel, a massive surge of humanitarian aid channeled through the UN, and concrete steps toward Palestinian self-determination.^10 These are not partisan demands; they are the moral minimum. If our commitment to human decency means anything, it means using the political, economic, and diplomatic tools at our disposal to stop the killing and to ensure accountability.



To those who will recoil from the word “genocide” because of fear or politics, I say this: naming the crime does not deny complexity. It clarifies responsibility. It opens the path to justice, and it refuses the slow slide into normalizing the unthinkable. The memory of past genocides demands that we speak plainly now—because silence will be judged more harshly than any mistake of language.^11



Read Sanders’ op-ed. Hear the voices of the living and the dead. Then ask yourself what you are willing to do to stop this. A country that calls itself moral cannot shrug away from children starving in real time. We can argue about geopolitics until the next election cycle, or we can choose humanity now.



If we choose the latter, history will remember that we acted when the lamp of civilization flickered. If we fail, history will remember that we watched the lamp gutter out. The choice is ours.




(This post draws on Senator Bernie Sanders’ op-ed “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, and reporting from major international outlets and human-rights organizations.)



Footnotes

  1. Bernie Sanders, “It Is Genocide,” September 17, 2025, Office of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
  2. Ibid.
  3. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Humanitarian Situation Report: Gaza, 2025.
  4. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  5. Amnesty International, Israel/OPT: Evidence of War Crimes in Gaza, 2024; Human Rights Watch, Israel/Palestine: Pattern of War Crimes, 2024.
  6. United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Report, September 2025.
  7. World Food Programme (WFP), Gaza Emergency Update, 2025.
  8. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  9. B’Tselem, This Is Genocide: Israel’s Assault on Gaza, 2025.
  10. Sanders, “It Is Genocide.”
  11. Omer Bartov, “I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It,” New York Times, July 18, 2025.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

  There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

  Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...
Post a Comment
Read more