Skip to main content

Ione Belarra: A Lone Voice of Conscience in Europe’s Silence on Gaza

 


When history writes the record of our times, it will ask: Who stood up while children were slaughtered, and who looked away? In Spain, that answer will bear one clear name — Ione Belarra, the former Minister of Social Rights, a woman who dared to call Israel what few in power have had the courage to say: “a planned genocide.”

Belarra is not a career diplomat rehearsing sterile phrases. She is a psychologist, a parliamentarian, and until November 2023, a minister in Pedro Sánchez’s cabinet. More importantly, she has been the conscience of a Europe that has largely drowned in cowardice. When governments mumbled about “humanitarian corridors” as bombs flattened hospitals and starved civilians, Belarra raised her voice with defiance:

“Do not make us complicit in genocide. Act. Not in our name.”

Her words cut through the hypocrisy of Western capitals that lecture the world about human rights while arming Israel to the teeth. Belarra did not mince her demands. She called for Spain and Europe to do what they had done against Putin:

  • Suspend diplomatic relations with Israel.
  • Impose sanctions and an arms embargo.
  • Drag Netanyahu and his accomplices before the International Criminal Court.

She understood something most leaders refuse to admit: complicity is not measured in statements, but in trade deals, in weapons shipments, in the silence that emboldens war crimes.

And yet, in Spain as elsewhere, truth is always inconvenient. Belarra’s uncompromising stance triggered fury from the establishment. The government of Sánchez, eager to balance its moral posturing with its economic ties, bristled at her accusations of “hypocrisy.” She spoke plainly about Spain’s continued arms exports to Israel:

“I have no words to describe the shame I feel about the hypocrisy of the Spanish Government.”

For this clarity, she was branded as “radical” and “extreme.” Critics accused her of exaggeration, of inflaming rhetoric, of crossing diplomatic boundaries. But what is more extreme: denouncing genocide, or supplying bombs to those who commit it? What is more radical: calling for justice, or normalizing the daily murder of children under the banner of “security”?

Despite the backlash, her words resonated deeply across Spanish society. Tens of thousands poured into the streets of Madrid, Barcelona, and Seville waving Palestinian flags and chanting for a ceasefire. Civil society groups, trade unions, students, and artists echoed her cry: “Not in our name.” Polls reveal what Belarra sensed all along — the Spanish people stand with Palestine, even when their government wavers.

Europe needed this voice. In a continent deafened by the roar of weapons and the silence of complicity, Belarra broke through with raw honesty. She reminded us that neutrality in the face of genocide is not diplomacy — it is betrayal.

History will remember Ione Belarra not as a politician who played it safe, but as a minister who risked her career to speak the truth. She is proof that moral courage is still possible in politics — and that even in the halls of power, there remain those who refuse to wash their hands in the blood of Gaza’s children.

The question now is not whether Belarra was right. The question is whether anyone will join her.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed.

  Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed “ I delivered a beheaded woman who was nine months pregnant. ” That’s not a horror-film script. That’s not medieval history. That is the testimony of an Australian medic standing in a Gaza hospital in 2025, describing what it means to “ practice medicine ” under Israeli bombardment. A nine-months-pregnant woman , decapitated , her body torn open so that the child she carried could be pulled out lifeless — and somehow this is still not enough to shake the comfortable democracies of the West into anything resembling a conscience. We should probably give the Nobel Prize for Creative Euphemism to the politicians who still call this “self-defense.” After all, there’s nothing quite as defensive as severing the head of an expectant mother and forcing foreign doctors to deliver her dead child in the rubble of what used to be a hospital . Bravo, civilization . The tragedy is not just the atrocity itself. It’s the smug perfo...

Docu Drama. The voice of Hind Rajab.

The Red Phone Rings, but the World Hits Mute The world just gave a 23-minute standing ovation —yes, twenty-three full minutes of clapping —for The Voice of Hind Rajab at the Venice Film Festival . Applause so long it could’ve filled Hind’s final desperate phone call to the Red Crescent. Bravo, humanity. We couldn’t save her when it mattered, but at least we can applaud her ghost. This is the new morality play: a five-year-old Palestinian child, trapped in a bullet-riddled car , whispering “please come, I’m scared ,” while surrounded by the corpses of her family. The Red Crescent tried . Paramedics drove toward her and were killed too . Israel buried them in silence . And the “ civilized world ”? It buried her in its news cycle . But now—don’t worry— we have a movie . Starring Hind’s voice. Directed by Kaouther Ben Hania. Produced by an ensemble of Hollywood conscience-bearers : Brad Pitt, Joaquin Phoenix, Rooney Mara, Alfonso Cuarón, Jonathan Glazer, Jemima Khan , and others. ...

The End of Zionism? Welcome to the Funeral Nobody Wants to Admit Is Overdue

  Of course. Haaretz recently published an opinion piece by Ithamar Handelman -Smith titled “ Some Say It’s the End of Zionism, and I Say That’s All Right .” And what impeccable timing: as Israel carries out a near-two-year campaign of siege, famine, and bombardment in Gaza — slaughtering families, burying aid workers with their ambulances, and literally starving children to death — someone in Israel finally whispers the unspeakable: maybe Zionism, that 20th-century project of “ Jewish salvation ,” has outlived its moral shelf life. Bravo. The house is burning, bodies are scattered in the street, and the philosopher shows up with a garden hose . Zionism: Success Story or Crime Scene? Handelman-Smith argues that Zionism achieved its success : a Jewish state, a safe haven, a fortress against the ghosts of Europe’s crimes . But like every “ success story ” drenched in other people’s blood , it didn’t age well. What began as refuge turned into domination; what was called “ ...

Dockers of Conscience: Italy’s Brave Guardians of Gaza

  At a time when most governments avert their eyes , when institutions choose silence over principle, it is often the hands hardened by real work — the hands of dockworkers— that lift the banner of humanity. In Genoa , those hands belong to the members of the Unione Sindacale di Base (USB) and the dockworkers’ collective CALP ( Collettivo Autonomo Lavoratori Portuali ) . These are not new voices. For years they have stood where conscience demands —on the cold concrete of the docks , blocking ships laden with weapons destined for wars , refusing to let Italy’s ports be complicit in bloodshed. USB , born in 2010 out of grassroots struggles , has carried a proud history of international solidarity. Its members have consistently placed labor at the service of justice, from strikes against austerity to protests against militarism . CALP , forged in Genoa’s port , has a more direct history with Palestine: blocking Israeli-bound weapons , organizing boycotts, and declaring, time ...

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.

So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “ recognises the State of Palestine. ” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption . It’s theatre. 1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future. On 2 November 1917 , Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object , it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine , or the rights and political sta...