A Calculated Deluge: The Arithmetic of Annihilation in Gaza

Let’s talk numbers.
Not the kind that anesthetize, but the kind that sear.
The kind that, when faced honestly, strip away the rhetoric and lay bare the machinery of destruction.

The Source

This is not rumor.
This is not speculation.

On July 12, 2024, Martin Griffiths—the UN’s Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs—stood before the Security Council and said the words in cold, diplomatic tone:

“According to our colleagues at UNOSAT, Israel’s military operations have rained down 100,000 tonnes of explosives on Gaza in the first six months of the war.”

One. Hundred. Thousand. Tonnes.
A number so monstrous it dissolves into abstraction—unless we force it into meaning.

What 100,000 Tonnes Looks Like

Per Person: 43.5 kg of explosives for every man, woman, and child in Gaza.
A family of five? A 200 kg package of death—two full-grown gorillas made of TNT—delivered to their doorstep.
Per City Block: 455 tonnes per square kilometer.
Imagine your neighborhood. Now imagine 45 dump trucks, each carrying 10 tonnes of explosives, parked bumper-to-bumper down every single street—and then detonated.
The Benchmark: Hiroshima’s bomb had a yield of 15,000 tonnes.
Gaza has endured the equivalent of six Hiroshimas, not in a single instant, but as a half-year-long storm of fire unleashed on a trapped civilian population.

This is not collateral damage. This is calculated arithmetic.

The Supply Chain of Destruction

This scale of carnage does not happen in a vacuum.
It requires factories, cargo ships, signatures, authorizations.

And it has them.

The Supplier: The United States of America.
The Process: Billions in military aid. Emergency waivers. Shipments fast-tracked past Congress.
The Proof: Serial numbers stamped onto bomb fragments, traced back to U.S. factories.
The Shield: Vetoes at the UN Security Council, speeches about Israel’s “right to defend itself,” and silence about the rubble.

Every detonation in Gaza carries the echo of an American assembly line.

The Heaviest Question

We have the math.
We have the sources.
We have the photographs.

So history will ask us:

What did we do when we saw 100,000 tonnes of explosives used against a civilian population?

Did we learn that our laws are meaningless?
That our institutions are hollow?
That some lives are disposable, their killers untouchable?

Or—
Will we learn that “Never Again” is indivisible?
That accountability cannot be selective?
That those who supply and shield mass violence share in its crime?

The statistics are already carved into Gaza’s rubble.
The only question left is:

What will be carved into our conscience?

Comments

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog