Thomas Friedman’s Half-Truth Elegy: Israel’s Suicide Notes, Written in Gaza’s Blood.

Thomas L. Friedman, the perennial high priest of “both-sides-ism,” has returned with his latest sermon: Israel’s Gaza Campaign Is Making It a Pariah State (Aug. 25, 2025).

And what a revelation! Friedman has finally discovered—after nearly a year of livestreamed slaughter—that Israel might just be isolating itself by dropping bombs on hospitals, torching refugee camps, and turning starvation into policy. Bravo, Tom. Pulitzer number four incoming?

But let’s not get too carried away. Friedman, as always, performs his trademark balancing act:

“I will leave it to historians to debate whether Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.”

Translation: I see genocide, you see genocide, but let’s kick the can down the road to the PhD crowd so I can keep my column slot tidy. It’s not denial—it’s the art of avoiding clarity when clarity might cost cocktail party invitations in Tel Aviv or D.C

The “Tragic Mishap” Industry

Friedman was “struck” (his word) by the Israeli strike on Nasser Hospital, which killed 20 people—including five international journalists. Israel responded with its standard press release: Oops, tragic mishap. We regret any harm to uninvolved individuals.

How many “mishaps” does it take before it stops being tragic and becomes policy? How many dead doctors, reporters, and children before the world stops treating these as accidents of war and starts calling them the deliberate elimination of witnesses and survivors? Friedman doesn’t say. He prefers the soft-focus lens: suicide, homicide, fratricide—eloquent abstractions that sound like Shakespearean tragedy rather than daily livestreamed war crimes.

Bibi’s War of Survival (Not Israel’s)

Even Friedman admits the obvious: Netanyahu is prolonging the war not for Israel’s security, but for his own political survival—dodging prison and clinging to power by feeding Gaza to the wolves. Yet Friedman still draws his careful line: it’s not genocide, it’s just “homicide” stretched out for political convenience.

Imagine the comfort Palestinians must feel knowing they’re not being exterminated, merely collateral damage in one man’s campaign against his trial dates.

Israel the Pariah (Finally)

Friedman cites examples of Israelis facing backlash abroad: a French theme park, Australian ministers snapping back, cruise passengers stranded. To him, these are the shocking signs of Israel’s fall from grace. To everyone else, they’re crumbs compared to the avalanche of fury Palestinians have lived under for decades. But Friedman frames it like Israel just went from prom king to cafeteria outcast.

Yes, Israel is becoming a pariah—but not because the world suddenly became cruel. It’s because the mask has slipped, and the world now sees the bulldozed homes, the mass graves, the blocked food trucks, and the endless excuses for killing.

Assisted Suicide: Trump & the American Seal of Approval

Friedman ends with his classic Washington maneuver: pinning hope (and blame) on an American president. In this case, Trump—the man who calls famine humanitarian policy and thinks “total victory” is just good branding. According to Friedman, Netanyahu is “duping” Trump into endless war.

As though Trump—who greenlit the starvation strategy, cut UNICEF off the aid routes, and cheered Netanyahu’s “final victory”—were some innocent schoolboy tricked by the crafty Israeli fox. No, Tom. This isn’t assisted suicide. It’s a joint venture. Netanyahu writes the script, and Washington bankrolls the production.

The Real Suicide Note

Friedman wants us to see Israel’s descent as tragic self-destruction. But the suicide note is being written in Gaza’s blood, not in Hebrew ink. And every “tragic mishap,” every starving child, every bombed hospital is not just a stain on Israel’s moral standing—it’s an indictment of every columnist who waited this long to admit what the world already knew.

Israel isn’t just committing homicide, suicide, and fratricide. It’s committing erasure. And erasure isn’t tragic—it’s deliberate.

Comments

Price Tag Attackers: Extremist Settler Violence in the West Bank.

Year-by-year breakdown of documented " Price Tag" attacks in the West Bank and Israel , based on reports from UN OCHA , B’Tselem , Yesh Din , and Israeli media (Haaretz, Times of Israel). Introduction to "Price Tag" Attackers "Price Tag" attackers are extremist Israeli settlers , primarily affiliated with radical right-wing groups, who carry out violent acts agains Palestinians, Israeli security forces, and left-wing activists in retaliation for perceived threats to Jewish settlements in the West Bank . The term refers to the " price " they seek to impose for actions like outpost demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Israelis. - Vandalism, arson, or violence by extremist settlers against Palestinians, Israeli security forces, or left-wing activists. - Often involves graffiti (e.g., "Price Tag," "Revenge," or "Arabs Out"). - Retaliation for Palestinian attacks, outpost demolitions, or Israeli gover...

The Politicization of Antisemitism: Randy Fine, AIPAC, and the Fight Over Anti-Israel Speech

Randy Fine. Brief introduction of Randy Fine. Randy Fine is a U.S. Representative-Elect for Florida's 6th Congressional District and a former Florida State Senator . Born on April 20, 1974, in Tucson , Arizona , Fine holds degrees from Harvard College and Harvard Business School . He began his political career in 2016 as a member of the Florida House of Representatives and later served in the Florida Senate. Fine is known for his strong pro-Israel stance, earning him the nickname " Hebrew Hammer, " and his socially conservative views . He has been involved in contentious legislation and has faced both support and criticism for his policies and rhetoric. Detailed overview of Randy Fine 's stance and legislative efforts related to criminalizing the distribution of anti-Israel flyers, along with broader context about his political agenda and controversies : --- 1. Randy Fine’s Legislative Efforts Against Anti-Israel Flyers - Florida’s Hate Crime Law (2023): ...

The Media Sold the War. We Watched It Happen.

What Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide reveals—and what the question of digital witnessing forces us to confront There is a disturbing question at the heart of the Gaza catastrophe that cannot be answered simply by asking what governments did, what armies did, or even what the media reported. There is another question: What did the world do while watching? Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide: The Media’s Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza, published by Pluto Press, approaches Gaza through the machinery of mainstream American media. His investigation examines how some of the most influential institutions in the Western information system—including The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC—framed the destruction of Gaza. It is an important question because wars are not fought only with weapons. They are also fought through language. Before bombs become statistics, they become headlines. Before civilian deaths become numbers, they become narratives. Before dest...

The Price of Their Silence: How Islamophobia Became an Industry—and Muslims Its Global Collateral

🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 28, 2025 They bombed Iraq for democracy. Tortured Afghans in the name of security. Waterboarded bodies at Guantanamo and called it “enhanced interrogation.” And now in Gaza—they bury children under rubble and whisper, self-defense . This isn’t a war on terror. It’s a war on memory, on names, on brown bodies that pray in Arabic. And Islamophobia has been its golden engine—powerful, profitable, and protected. 🧠 Islamophobia: Not Just Prejudice—A $Billions Industry Islamophobia is not just a bias—it’s a well-funded psychological operation . According to the Center for American Progress , over $42 million was channeled (2001–2011) into think tanks and media fronts to craft and normalize anti-Muslim sentiment. This isn’t random—it’s strategic. The goal: keep the public afraid —of Muslims, of mosques, of immigrants, of something called Sharia Law . 📘 Sharia Law: The Manufactured Threat That Never Was Let’s be c...

Zionism, Antisemitism — and the Grotesque Death of a Political Theology

If you ever wanted to witness how confusion, opportunism, theology, nationalism, and bigotry collide in real time — you didn’t need a medieval church council. You only needed to tune into a meeting of the . There, amid political loyalists and pop-culture appointees, a spectacle unfolded: Zionism was denounced, antisemitic conspiracies were flirted with, and centuries-old theological errors were recycled as if they were fresh revelations. But the deeper issue is not one controversial appointee. The deeper issue is this: What precisely is Zionism? And how does it intersect — or collide — with antisemitism? Because in today’s discourse, the two are either falsely merged or lazily separated without thought. Let us disentangle them carefully. 1. What Is Zionism — Precisely? Zionism , in its original and political form, is a 19th-century nationalist movement. It emerged in Europe not from theology, but from crisis. The father of modern political Zionism, , was not respon...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog