Skip to main content

Thomas Friedman’s Half-Truth Elegy: Israel’s Suicide Notes, Written in Gaza’s Blood.

 


Thomas L. Friedman, the perennial high priest of “both-sides-ism,” has returned with his latest sermon: Israel’s Gaza Campaign Is Making It a Pariah State (Aug. 25, 2025).

And what a revelation! Friedman has finally discovered—after nearly a year of livestreamed slaughter—that Israel might just be isolating itself by dropping bombs on hospitals, torching refugee camps, and turning starvation into policy. Bravo, Tom. Pulitzer number four incoming?

But let’s not get too carried away. Friedman, as always, performs his trademark balancing act:

“I will leave it to historians to debate whether Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.”

Translation: I see genocide, you see genocide, but let’s kick the can down the road to the PhD crowd so I can keep my column slot tidy. It’s not denialit’s the art of avoiding clarity when clarity might cost cocktail party invitations in Tel Aviv or D.C




The “Tragic Mishap” Industry

Friedman was “struck” (his word) by the Israeli strike on Nasser Hospital, which killed 20 people—including five international journalists. Israel responded with its standard press release: Oops, tragic mishap. We regret any harm to uninvolved individuals.

How many “mishaps” does it take before it stops being tragic and becomes policy? How many dead doctors, reporters, and children before the world stops treating these as accidents of war and starts calling them the deliberate elimination of witnesses and survivors? Friedman doesn’t say. He prefers the soft-focus lens: suicide, homicide, fratricide—eloquent abstractions that sound like Shakespearean tragedy rather than daily livestreamed war crimes.

Bibi’s War of Survival (Not Israel’s)

Even Friedman admits the obvious: Netanyahu is prolonging the war not for Israel’s security, but for his own political survivaldodging prison and clinging to power by feeding Gaza to the wolves. Yet Friedman still draws his careful line: it’s not genocide, it’s just “homicide” stretched out for political convenience.

Imagine the comfort Palestinians must feel knowing they’re not being exterminated, merely collateral damage in one man’s campaign against his trial dates.

Israel the Pariah (Finally)

Friedman cites examples of Israelis facing backlash abroad: a French theme park, Australian ministers snapping back, cruise passengers stranded. To him, these are the shocking signs of Israel’s fall from grace. To everyone else, they’re crumbs compared to the avalanche of fury Palestinians have lived under for decades. But Friedman frames it like Israel just went from prom king to cafeteria outcast.

Yes, Israel is becoming a pariah—but not because the world suddenly became cruel. It’s because the mask has slipped, and the world now sees the bulldozed homes, the mass graves, the blocked food trucks, and the endless excuses for killing.



Assisted Suicide: Trump & the American Seal of Approval

Friedman ends with his classic Washington maneuver: pinning hope (and blame) on an American president. In this case, Trump—the man who calls famine humanitarian policy and thinks “total victory” is just good branding. According to Friedman, Netanyahu is “duping” Trump into endless war.

As though Trump—who greenlit the starvation strategy, cut UNICEF off the aid routes, and cheered Netanyahu’s “final victory”—were some innocent schoolboy tricked by the crafty Israeli fox. No, Tom. This isn’t assisted suicide. It’s a joint venture. Netanyahu writes the script, and Washington bankrolls the production.



The Real Suicide Note

Friedman wants us to see Israel’s descent as tragic self-destruction. But the suicide note is being written in Gaza’s blood, not in Hebrew ink. And every “tragic mishap,” every starving child, every bombed hospital is not just a stain on Israel’s moral standing—it’s an indictment of every columnist who waited this long to admit what the world already knew.

Israel isn’t just committing homicide, suicide, and fratricide. It’s committing erasure. And erasure isn’t tragic—it’s deliberate.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

The High Priest of “Serious” Wars Discovers Bibi

  There was a time when rode into every Middle Eastern catastrophe like a TED Talk with a press pass. If there was a war to explain, a regime to modernize, or a “vital message” to send with cruise missiles, Tom was there — sleeves rolled up, metaphors polished. Back when the invasion of was sold as a democratic software update, Friedman wasn’t exactly storming the barricades. He was midwifing “creative destruction.” The region would be shocked into sanity. History would bend toward market reform. Fast forward. Now he’s discovered that might be bending something else entirely. When an Ex–Prime Minister Uses the Words “Ethnic Cleansing” What jolts Friedman’s latest column is not campus rhetoric. Not activist slogans. Not fringe NGOs. It’s — a former Israeli prime minister — using language that once would have detonated diplomatic careers. Olmert wrote in Haaretz that: “A violent and criminal effort is underway to ethnically cleanse territories in the West Bank.” Let...

Sanctions, Selective Morality, and the War That Never Ends

  On Feb. 28, 2026, The Editorial Board of NYTimes  warned that President Trump’s latest strike on Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and strategically undefined. The board expressed concern for “the many innocent Iranians who have long suffered.” Eleven days earlier, on Feb. 17, 2026, wrote something even more explosive: “ Israel’s far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is spitting in America’s face and telling us it’s raining. It’s not raining. Bibi is playing both President Trump and American Jews for fools.” Friedman was not questioning Israel’s right to defend itself. He was questioning whether American power was being drawn into a strategy shaped less by U.S. national interest and more by Israel’s domestic political calculus. That distinction matters. Iran as the Permanent External Threat For over four decades, Iran has been under American sanctions. Since 1979, layers of financial, oil, trade, and banking restrictions have been impo...

Blood in the Car Park: Islamophobia and the Fear That Follows Us to Prayer

  On a cold February evening in 2026, 18-year-old Zeeshan Afzal was stabbed to death in the parking lot of Oldbury Jamia Masjid, near Birmingham. He had just prayed. He had just stood shoulder to shoulder with other worshippers in Ramadan — the month of mercy, of restraint, of forgiveness. Minutes later, he lay bleeding in the dark. Police have said the investigation is ongoing and that the killing is not currently being treated as religiously motivated. That is an important and responsible clarification. Motive must be established by evidence, not emotion. And yet. Across Muslim communities in Britain and Europe, the question whispers through homes and WhatsApp groups alike: Are we safe? Even at the mosque? The Atmosphere We Cannot Ignore Even when a specific case is not officially labeled a hate crime, it unfolds within a larger social climate. And that climate matters. Across Europe, reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes have surged in recent years. Mosques vandalized....

When a Journalist Becomes a “Hybrid Threat”

  The Administrative Erasure of Hüseyin Doğru Europe prides itself on being the global capital of press freedom. And yet, in 2025, the Council of the European Union placed a German journalist under sanctions using a legal regime originally designed to counter Russian destabilisation. The journalist: The legal instrument used against him: Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642 Concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities CELEX: 32024R2642 Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 Restrictive measures framework (Common Foreign and Security Policy) CELEX: 32024D2643 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2021 (3 October 2025 – listing amendment including Doğru) CELEX: 32025R2021 These are not criminal statutes. They are foreign-policy instruments. And under them, a journalist inside the European Union was designated as supporting destabilising activities. What the Official Listing Says According to the Official Journal entry (Annex t...