Skip to main content

Israel’s “Regret Machine” Strikes Again: Five Journalists Dead at Gaza’s Nasser Hospital.

 



Two Israeli airstrikes hit Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis on Monday. One strike on the fourth floor. A second — the infamous “double tap” — as rescue crews rushed in. Result: at least 20 dead, including five journalists, medical staff, patients, and rescue workers.

And Israel’s response? You already know the script.

  • “We regret any harm to uninvolved individuals.”
  • “An immediate inquiry has been ordered.”
  • “We do not target journalists as such.”

Ah yes, the greatest hits. A playlist on repeat for two years and counting.


Regret as Policy

Let’s pause for a moment. Because Israel’s regret machine is working overtime.

  • 188 journalists already killed in Gaza before this strike. Every time: regret, inquiry, silence, repeat.
  • World Central Kitchen convoy slaughtered? Netanyahu’s war machine offered regret. Then inquiry. Then buried the outrage until Jake Wood, the CEO himself, publicly exploded.
  • The Flour Massacre? Hundreds starved Palestinians gunned down in cold blood. Again, regret. Inquiry. Silence.
  • Aid sites of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation? Strikes on food warehouses, convoys, aid workers. This time? Not even the courtesy of regret. Why waste regret on anonymous Palestinians, right?

It’s almost like Israel’s military press office has a pre-saved template:

“We regret [insert number] of dead [insert civilians/journalists/aid workers]. An inquiry is underway. Please tune out until next massacre.”


Journalists as Targets of “Non-Targeting”

The dead this time:

  • Hussam al-Masri – Reuters contractor.
  • Mohammed Salama – Al Jazeera cameraman.
  • Mariam Dagga (33) – Associated Press freelancer, mother. Her 12-year-old son was already evacuated from Gaza. She had been reporting on children starving in hospital beds.
  • Moaz Abu Taha – Freelance journalist, occasional Reuters contributor.
  • Ahmad Abu Aziz – Middle East Eye contributor.

These weren’t faceless names. They were the lifeline for the outside world, the reporters the globe depended on because Israel bars international journalists from entering Gaza. They were literally standing where cameras always stood — at the hospital staircase — when the missiles came down.

Israel says it doesn’t “target journalists as such.” A phrase so absurd it deserves its own Oscar in the category of Best Euphemism for Assassination.




The Double Tap of Truth

Let’s not gloss over this: witnesses and video evidence show a double strike. First hit: the hospital’s fourth floor. Second hit: the rescuers and journalists running in.

Rights groups call this a war crime. Israel calls it an “inquiry.” The rest of us call it what it is: the silencing of truth in real time, live on Al-Ghad TV’s camera feed.


The World Still Relies on the Voices It Allows to Die

Because remember: Israel banned the world’s press from entering Gaza. So the world has been forced to rely on Palestinian journalists, reporting under bombardment and starvation.

Now five more are dead. And Israel regrets. Always regrets. Always investigates. Never changes.

Meanwhile, the Committee to Protect Journalists counts at least 192 journalists killed since this war began. One of the deadliest wars for media workers in modern history. And still, Israeli officials will shrug and repeat: “Hamas uses hospitals.”


Final Irony

Hospitals in Gaza are reduced to rubble. Aid convoys bombed. Food warehouses torched. Journalists silenced. And every time, Israel shakes its head: “Oops. Regret. Inquiry.”

But let’s be clear: regret without accountability is not remorse. It’s performance.
Inquiry without justice is not truth. It’s theatre.

And as long as the world keeps swallowing this theatre, Gaza’s journalists, aid workers, and starving civilians will continue to be buried under Israel’s “regret.”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Price Tag Attackers: Extremist Settler Violence in the West Bank.

  Year-by-year breakdown of documented " Price Tag" attacks in the West Bank and Israel , based on reports from UN OCHA , B’Tselem , Yesh Din , and Israeli media (Haaretz, Times of Israel). Introduction to "Price Tag" Attackers  "Price Tag" attackers are extremist Israeli settlers , primarily affiliated with radical right-wing groups, who carry out violent acts agains Palestinians, Israeli security forces, and left-wing activists  in retaliation for perceived threats to Jewish settlements in the West Bank . The term refers to the " price " they seek to impose for actions like outpost demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Israelis.   - Vandalism, arson, or violence by extremist settlers against Palestinians, Israeli security forces, or left-wing activists.      - Often involves graffiti (e.g., "Price Tag," "Revenge," or "Arabs Out").     - Retaliation for Palestinian attacks, outpost demolitions, or Israeli gover...

The Politicization of Antisemitism: Randy Fine, AIPAC, and the Fight Over Anti-Israel Speech

  Randy Fine.  Brief introduction of Randy Fine.  Randy Fine is a U.S. Representative-Elect for Florida's 6th Congressional District and a former Florida State Senator . Born on April 20, 1974, in Tucson , Arizona , Fine holds degrees from Harvard College and Harvard Business School . He began his political career in 2016 as a member of the Florida House of Representatives and later served in the Florida Senate. Fine is known for his strong pro-Israel stance, earning him the nickname " Hebrew Hammer, " and his socially conservative views . He has been involved in contentious legislation and has faced both support and criticism for his policies and rhetoric. Detailed overview of Randy Fine 's stance and legislative efforts related to criminalizing the distribution of anti-Israel flyers, along with broader context about his political agenda and controversies : --- 1. Randy Fine’s Legislative Efforts Against Anti-Israel Flyers - Florida’s Hate Crime Law (2023): ...

The Media Sold the War. We Watched It Happen.

What Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide reveals—and what the question of digital witnessing forces us to confront There is a disturbing question at the heart of the Gaza catastrophe that cannot be answered simply by asking what governments did, what armies did, or even what the media reported. There is another question: What did the world do while watching? Adam H. Johnson’s How to Sell a Genocide: The Media’s Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza, published by Pluto Press, approaches Gaza through the machinery of mainstream American media. His investigation examines how some of the most influential institutions in the Western information system—including The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC—framed the destruction of Gaza. It is an important question because wars are not fought only with weapons. They are also fought through language. Before bombs become statistics, they become headlines. Before civilian deaths become numbers, they become narratives. Before dest...

The Price of Their Silence: How Islamophobia Became an Industry—and Muslims Its Global Collateral

  🖋️ By Malik Mukhtar 📍 ainnbeen.blogspot.com | 🗓️ June 28, 2025 They bombed Iraq for democracy. Tortured Afghans in the name of security. Waterboarded bodies at Guantanamo and called it “enhanced interrogation.” And now in Gaza—they bury children under rubble and whisper, self-defense . This isn’t a war on terror. It’s a war on memory, on names, on brown bodies that pray in Arabic. And Islamophobia has been its golden engine—powerful, profitable, and protected. 🧠 Islamophobia: Not Just Prejudice—A $Billions Industry Islamophobia is not just a bias—it’s a well-funded psychological operation . According to the Center for American Progress , over $42 million was channeled (2001–2011) into think tanks and media fronts to craft and normalize anti-Muslim sentiment. This isn’t random—it’s strategic. The goal: keep the public afraid —of Muslims, of mosques, of immigrants, of something called Sharia Law . 📘 Sharia Law: The Manufactured Threat That Never Was Let’s be c...

Zionism, Antisemitism — and the Grotesque Death of a Political Theology

  If you ever wanted to witness how confusion, opportunism, theology, nationalism, and bigotry collide in real time — you didn’t need a medieval church council. You only needed to tune into a meeting of the . There, amid political loyalists and pop-culture appointees, a spectacle unfolded: Zionism was denounced, antisemitic conspiracies were flirted with, and centuries-old theological errors were recycled as if they were fresh revelations. But the deeper issue is not one controversial appointee. The deeper issue is this: What precisely is Zionism? And how does it intersect — or collide — with antisemitism? Because in today’s discourse, the two are either falsely merged or lazily separated without thought. Let us disentangle them carefully. 1. What Is Zionism — Precisely? Zionism , in its original and political form, is a 19th-century nationalist movement. It emerged in Europe not from theology, but from crisis. The father of modern political Zionism, , was not respon...