When Hate Wears the Cloak of Faith: A Note on Gaza’s Nightmare

When Hate Wears the Cloak of Faith: A Note on Gaza’s Nightmare

As Gaza bleeds under relentless bombardment, mass displacement, and starvation, the world watches the unfolding horror with either numbed apathy or strategic silence. But amid the physical destruction lies something even darker: the moral erosion visible in the words of those who claim to speak for God.

In March 2024, Rabbi Eliyahu Mali, head of the Shirat Moshe Yeshiva, openly declared that “everyone in Gaza should be killed — even the babies.” Justifying this with religious law, he explained, “Today he’s a baby, tomorrow he’s a fighter,” reducing infants to future enemies and stripping an entire population of its right to live, simply by virtue of being Palestinian.

This was not an isolated outburst. In October 2023, former Knesset member Moshe Feiglin proclaimed in a televised interview: “There is no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza. Flatten the place. Turn Gaza into a slaughterhouse.”

Adding to this chorus of dehumanization, in January 2024, Nissim Vaturi, Deputy Speaker of the Knesset, declared: “Any child who is born [in Gaza] now is already a terrorist, from the moment of his birth.” In other words, even the cries of newborns are now treated as acts of war.

And yet — amid all this open and unapologetic incitement — the phrase that continues to provoke the loudest international condemnation, campus bans, and political hysteria is not “Kill the babies” or “Flatten Gaza.” No, it’s this:
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

This chant — at its core — is a cry for justice, for liberation, for the end of apartheid and occupation from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. It envisions a homeland where Palestinians are no longer second-class, no longer imprisoned in blockades, no longer refugees in their own land. And yes, for some it may carry radical connotations — as all freedom slogans have done throughout history, from “Black Lives Matter” to “Viva la Revolución.” But if that is extremism, what then do we call the bombing of refugee camps, the starvation of children, and leaders calling for genocide?

Is the chant dangerous because of what it says — or because of who dares to say it?

Universities across the West, institutions that once prided themselves on free speech, now ban the slogan. Lawmakers demand censorship. Social media platforms silence it.

And yet, not one of those same institutions has banned or even denounced the words of Vaturi, Mali, or Feiglin. Evidently, calls to “flatten Gaza” are policy positions — but “Palestine will be free” is hate speech.

These statements are not just rhetoric; they are green lights. When paired with a military campaign that has killed tens of thousands, displaced nearly the entire population, and pushed Gaza to the brink of famine, they become a genocidal doctrine. They are not metaphors — they are blueprints.

To remain silent in the face of such explicit hate is to be complicit. These words must not be normalized, excused, or brushed aside as fringe extremism. They are part of the machinery of dehumanization that fuels this catastrophe.

The people of Gaza are not abstractions. They are mothers, fathers, students, doctors, artists — and yes, children who never got to grow up.

The world must decide if it will continue to allow religious fanaticism and racist nationalism to dictate who is allowed to live — and who must die.

We must speak. We must write. We must remember.
Because if even babies are declared legitimate targets, but chants for freedom are banned, then silence is no longer just cowardice — it's collaboration.
And history will remember who raised their voice — and who didn’t.

Comments

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog