Skip to main content

"There's Only One Way to Deal With Power-hungry Bullies Like Netanyahu and His Fundamentalist Partners" Dahlia Scheindlin. Haaretz. Key Points.



Article by Dahlia Scheindlin

--

Title: "There's Only One Way to Deal With Power-hungry Bullies Like Netanyahu and His Fundamentalist Partners" 

Published: March 28, 2025 , in Haaretz .  

---

Detailed Overview of the Article 


1. Core Argument: Netanyahu’s Authoritarian Power Grab

- Scheindlin critiques  Netanyahu’s latest move to control Israel’s judiciary through a Knesset amendment to a Basic Law, effectively politicizing judicial appointments 

- She compares Netanyahu’s tactics to bullying, arguing that his government rejects compromise and seeks total dominance over democratic institutions .  


2. Key Points:  

- Judicial Takeover: The amendment bypasses checks and balances, allowing Netanyahu’s coalition to handpick judges—a step toward autocratic rule .  

- Failed Dialogue: Scheindlin recounts a failed attempt at negotiation, illustrating how Netanyahu’s government dismisses opposition and silences dissent .  

- Broader Threat: The erosion of judicial independence endangers democracy not just for Israelis but also reinforces authoritarian policies in the occupied territories .  


3. Historical Context

- Links this power grab to Netanyahu’s long-standing efforts to weaken the judiciary (e.g., 2023 judicial coup attempts) .  

- Highlights parallels with global authoritarian trends, where leaders dismantle democratic safeguards .  


4. Political Implications: 

- Domestic: Further polarizes Israeli society, deepening the rift between secular liberals and far-right religious factions .

- International: Risks isolating Israel as democratic backsliding draws global condemnation .  


5. Scheindlin’s Conclusion: 

- No Room for Compromise: Netanyahu’s government operates like a "gang" that only understands force or resistance .  

- Call to Action: Urges civil society and opposition parties to mobilize against this democratic erosion .  

---

Additional Context from Scheindlin’s Recent Work  

- In a March 2025 Guardian piece, she argues that Netanyahu’s policies in Gaza and the West Bank are driven by territorial expansionism, not security .  

- A January 2025 Time  essay critiques Israel’s failed ceasefire negotiations, blaming Netanyahu’s refusal to engage politically with Hamas .  

---

Why This Matters

Scheindlin’s analysis underscores a critical juncture for Israel:  

- Democracy vs. Autocracy: The judiciary’s capture signals a point of no return for Israeli governance .  

- Global Repercussions: Weakens Israel’s moral standing amid ongoing conflicts .  


For the full article, see: [Haaretz](https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-03-28/ty-article/.premium/the-way-to-deal-with-power-hungry-bullies-like-netanyahu-and-his-fundamentalist-partners/00000195-dbd4-d1f1-a7d5-fbf465a10000) .  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Soup Kitchens Begin to Die

There is a special kind of cruelty in watching not only a society collapse, but also the last institutions keeping it alive. For nearly three years, Gaza's humanitarian lifeline has increasingly been reduced to a queue for a single meal. Parents no longer ask their children what they would like to eat. They ask whether there will be anything to eat at all. Childhood has become measured not in birthdays, classrooms, or family gatherings, but in ration lines, empty cooking pots, and the uncertain arrival of humanitarian assistance. Now even those fragile lifelines are disappearing. The gradual closure and scaling back of World Central Kitchen (WCK) operations reflects a convergence of financial pressures, operational insecurity, and restrictions affecting humanitarian access. According to World Central Kitchen and the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem, kitchens that once produced approximately one million meals each day have been progressively reduced, leaving only a han...

The Cracks Are No Longer Hairline

For decades, Washington treated support for Israel as something beyond debate. It was political scripture. Republicans defended it. Democrats defended it. Presidents came and went, wars came and went, thousands died, settlements expanded, Gaza burned, and the checks kept arriving. Questioning the arrangement was once political suicide. Now the walls are cracking. This week, more than half of House Democrats either voted to end U.S. aid to Israel or refused to oppose doing so. The amendment failed, but something far more important succeeded. The illusion collapsed. For years, American politicians insisted that criticism of Israeli government policy belonged only to "the fringe." Apparently the fringe has become half the Democratic caucus. History has an unusual sense of humor. The same establishment that spent years dismissing students, academics, humanitarian workers, doctors, journalists, and millions of protesters as naïve, radical, or antisemitic now finds itself strugglin...

When the President Sounds the Alarm, But the Government Looks Away.

A President's Moral Warning Israeli presidents traditionally avoid political confrontation. Their role is largely ceremonial and symbolic, intended to unify rather than divide. Yet Herzog chose to speak openly about something many observers have documented for years: the erosion of moral restraints. His language was unusually severe. Warning of what he called " a terrible process of brutalization " within Israeli society, Herzog lamented that " there are segments among us that are barely shocked by violence anymore " while " certain other segments treat it lightly." Perhaps most alarming was his warning that extremist conduct is no longer confined to society's fringes. Such behavior, he said, is " threatening to enter the mainstream ." The significance of the speech lies not merely in what was said, but in who said it. When a country's ceremonial head of state feels compelled to warn that brutality is becoming normalized, the ...

Starving Gaza: How Silence Is Enabling a Genocide in Real Time

  Gaza: Starving a Nation in Broad Daylight — and the World Must Act Now Seven weeks. Zero aid. Two million lives on the brink. Gaza is not just suffering — it is being starved. Deliberately. In full view of the world, an entire population is being pushed into famine, death, and despair. No humanitarian aid or commercial supplies have entered Gaza for over seven agonizing weeks. This is now the longest closure the Gaza Strip has ever faced — a man-made catastrophe unfolding before our eyes. The evidence is clear and horrifying: All 25 WFP-supported bakeries in Gaza have been forced to shut down. No wheat. No fuel. No bread. WFP food parcels — intended to last two weeks — have been completely exhausted. Safe drinking water has run dry , leaving families to scavenge scraps to burn just to cook a basic meal. Food prices have exploded by up to 1,400%. Hospitals are collapsing without medicine, electricity, or clean water . And yet, just beyond Gaza’s sealed borders, h...

Deutsche Bank's AML Failures: A Case Study in Regulatory Enforcement

German regulator BaFin has withdrawn its special monitor from Deutsche Bank, initially installed due to unresolved money-laundering control deficiencies . This monitor had been in place since 2018 , with its mandate extended to October 2024 earlier this year, threatening fines if improvements weren't made . Deutsche Bank, Germany's largest bank, acknowledged its compliance issues and stated it was cooperating with regulators . However, another monitor remains active , overseeing the bank's consumer service issues at its Postbank unit. Neither BaFin nor Deutsche Bank commented on the withdrawal report Part I Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany. What were the specific deficiencies in Deutsche Bank's money-laundering controls? Deutsche Bank has faced significant deficiencies in its anti-money laundering (AML) controls , primarily highlighted by: - Inadequate Customer Due Diligence:   The bank failed to perform sufficient due diligence on customer...