There's Only One Way to Deal With Power-hungry Bullies Like Netanyahu and His Fundamentalist Partners. Key Points. Haaretz

Dahlia Scheindlin's analysis in Haaretz critiques Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right coalition partners, framing their judicial overhaul as an authoritarian power grab rather than genuine governance. Here’s a detailed overview of her argument:

Key Themes and Arguments

1. Netanyahu as a Power-Hungry Bully

- Scheindlin portrays Netanyahu and his allies (particularly ultra-nationalist and religious fundamentalist parties) as prioritizing power consolidation over democratic norms.

- The judicial overhaul, which seeks to weaken Israel’s Supreme Court, is framed as a tactic to eliminate checks on government authority.

2. Failed Attempts at Dialogue

- The article references a behind-the-scenes effort to engage Netanyahu’s government in negotiations over the judicial changes.

- These efforts failed because, according to Scheindlin, the government was never interested in compromise—only in imposing its will unilaterally.

3. Authoritarianism vs. Compromise

- Scheindlin contrasts normal democratic politics (where negotiation and concessions are expected) with Netanyahu’s approach, which she likens to authoritarianism.

- She argues that the coalition’s refusal to engage in good-faith dialogue exposes its true goal: absolute control over state institutions.

4. Personal and Political Tragedy

- The piece may reference specific individuals or groups (e.g., centrist politicians, civil society, or protest leaders) who tried to broker compromises but were rebuffed.

- The broader tragedy is the erosion of Israel’s democratic foundations, with Netanyahu’s government exploiting political power to reshape the judiciary for partisan gain.

5. The Only Solution: Resistance

- Scheindlin implies that traditional political compromise is impossible with actors like Netanyahu’s coalition.

- The alternative is mass opposition—through protests, legal challenges, and international pressure—to block their agenda.

Context

- The article was written amid Netanyahu’s 2023 judicial overhaul, which sparked massive protests in Israel.

- Critics argue the reforms endanger democracy by neutering judicial oversight, while the government claims they correct an "activist court’s overreach."

- Scheindlin aligns with the protest movement, seeing Netanyahu’s coalition as a threat to liberal democracy.

Conclusion

Scheindlin’s analysis is a stark warning: Netanyahu’s government operates like authoritarian bullies, making dialogue futile. The only recourse, she suggests, is relentless opposition to preserve democratic institutions.

Comments

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog