There's Only One Way to Deal With Power-hungry Bullies Like Netanyahu and His Fundamentalist Partners. Key Points. Haaretz

Dahlia Scheindlin's analysis in Haaretz critiques Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right coalition partners, framing their judicial overhaul as an authoritarian power grab rather than genuine governance. Here’s a detailed overview of her argument:

Key Themes and Arguments

1. Netanyahu as a Power-Hungry Bully

- Scheindlin portrays Netanyahu and his allies (particularly ultra-nationalist and religious fundamentalist parties) as prioritizing power consolidation over democratic norms.

- The judicial overhaul, which seeks to weaken Israel’s Supreme Court, is framed as a tactic to eliminate checks on government authority.

2. Failed Attempts at Dialogue

- The article references a behind-the-scenes effort to engage Netanyahu’s government in negotiations over the judicial changes.

- These efforts failed because, according to Scheindlin, the government was never interested in compromise—only in imposing its will unilaterally.

3. Authoritarianism vs. Compromise

- Scheindlin contrasts normal democratic politics (where negotiation and concessions are expected) with Netanyahu’s approach, which she likens to authoritarianism.

- She argues that the coalition’s refusal to engage in good-faith dialogue exposes its true goal: absolute control over state institutions.

4. Personal and Political Tragedy

- The piece may reference specific individuals or groups (e.g., centrist politicians, civil society, or protest leaders) who tried to broker compromises but were rebuffed.

- The broader tragedy is the erosion of Israel’s democratic foundations, with Netanyahu’s government exploiting political power to reshape the judiciary for partisan gain.

5. The Only Solution: Resistance

- Scheindlin implies that traditional political compromise is impossible with actors like Netanyahu’s coalition.

- The alternative is mass opposition—through protests, legal challenges, and international pressure—to block their agenda.

Context

- The article was written amid Netanyahu’s 2023 judicial overhaul, which sparked massive protests in Israel.

- Critics argue the reforms endanger democracy by neutering judicial oversight, while the government claims they correct an "activist court’s overreach."

- Scheindlin aligns with the protest movement, seeing Netanyahu’s coalition as a threat to liberal democracy.

Conclusion

Scheindlin’s analysis is a stark warning: Netanyahu’s government operates like authoritarian bullies, making dialogue futile. The only recourse, she suggests, is relentless opposition to preserve democratic institutions.

Comments

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed.

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed “ I delivered a beheaded woman who was nine months pregnant. ” That’s not a horror-film script. That’s not medieval history. That is the testimony of an Australian medic standing in a Gaza hospital in 2025, describing what it means to “ practice medicine ” under Israeli bombardment. A nine-months-pregnant woman , decapitated , her body torn open so that the child she carried could be pulled out lifeless — and somehow this is still not enough to shake the comfortable democracies of the West into anything resembling a conscience. We should probably give the Nobel Prize for Creative Euphemism to the politicians who still call this “self-defense.” After all, there’s nothing quite as defensive as severing the head of an expectant mother and forcing foreign doctors to deliver her dead child in the rubble of what used to be a hospital . Bravo, civilization . The tragedy is not just the atrocity itself. It’s the smug perfo...

Docu Drama. The voice of Hind Rajab.

The Red Phone Rings, but the World Hits Mute The world just gave a 23-minute standing ovation —yes, twenty-three full minutes of clapping —for The Voice of Hind Rajab at the Venice Film Festival . Applause so long it could’ve filled Hind’s final desperate phone call to the Red Crescent. Bravo, humanity. We couldn’t save her when it mattered, but at least we can applaud her ghost. This is the new morality play: a five-year-old Palestinian child, trapped in a bullet-riddled car , whispering “please come, I’m scared ,” while surrounded by the corpses of her family. The Red Crescent tried . Paramedics drove toward her and were killed too . Israel buried them in silence . And the “ civilized world ”? It buried her in its news cycle . But now—don’t worry— we have a movie . Starring Hind’s voice. Directed by Kaouther Ben Hania. Produced by an ensemble of Hollywood conscience-bearers : Brad Pitt, Joaquin Phoenix, Rooney Mara, Alfonso Cuarón, Jonathan Glazer, Jemima Khan , and others. ...

The End of Zionism? Welcome to the Funeral Nobody Wants to Admit Is Overdue

Of course. Haaretz recently published an opinion piece by Ithamar Handelman -Smith titled “ Some Say It’s the End of Zionism, and I Say That’s All Right .” And what impeccable timing: as Israel carries out a near-two-year campaign of siege, famine, and bombardment in Gaza — slaughtering families, burying aid workers with their ambulances, and literally starving children to death — someone in Israel finally whispers the unspeakable: maybe Zionism, that 20th-century project of “ Jewish salvation ,” has outlived its moral shelf life. Bravo. The house is burning, bodies are scattered in the street, and the philosopher shows up with a garden hose . Zionism: Success Story or Crime Scene? Handelman-Smith argues that Zionism achieved its success : a Jewish state, a safe haven, a fortress against the ghosts of Europe’s crimes . But like every “ success story ” drenched in other people’s blood , it didn’t age well. What began as refuge turned into domination; what was called “ ...

Dockers of Conscience: Italy’s Brave Guardians of Gaza

At a time when most governments avert their eyes , when institutions choose silence over principle, it is often the hands hardened by real work — the hands of dockworkers— that lift the banner of humanity. In Genoa , those hands belong to the members of the Unione Sindacale di Base (USB) and the dockworkers’ collective CALP ( Collettivo Autonomo Lavoratori Portuali ) . These are not new voices. For years they have stood where conscience demands —on the cold concrete of the docks , blocking ships laden with weapons destined for wars , refusing to let Italy’s ports be complicit in bloodshed. USB , born in 2010 out of grassroots struggles , has carried a proud history of international solidarity. Its members have consistently placed labor at the service of justice, from strikes against austerity to protests against militarism . CALP , forged in Genoa’s port , has a more direct history with Palestine: blocking Israeli-bound weapons , organizing boycotts, and declaring, time ...

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.

So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “ recognises the State of Palestine. ” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption . It’s theatre. 1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future. On 2 November 1917 , Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object , it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine , or the rights and political sta...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog