" Netanyahu's Judicial Coup: Government Passes Bill for Political Takeover of Judicial Appointments" Haaretz. Key Points.

The bill is a key part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's controversial judicial overhaul plan, which has sparked massive protests and deep political divisions in Israel. Here’s a detailed overview of its provisions, implications, and context:

Key Provisions of the Bill

The legislation alters the composition and functioning of the Judicial Appointments Committee, the body responsible for selecting judges in Israel, including Supreme Court justices.

1. Politicization of Judicial Appointments:

- Previously, the nine-member committee included a mix of politicians, judges, and legal professionals, requiring broad consensus for appointments.

- The new law changes the balance, giving the governing coalition a de facto majority (7 out of 13 members, after a future expansion) in selecting judges.

- The committee will now include:

- 3 government ministers (up from 2).

- 3 coalition-backed Knesset members (instead of 2, with one traditionally from the opposition).

- The Supreme Court president and two other justices (reduced influence).

- 2 representatives from the Israel Bar Association (whose role may be weakened in future reforms).

2. Elimination of Checks and Balances:

- The previous system required at least one opposition MK and cooperation between branches of government.

- Now, the coalition can push through judicial appointments without opposition or judicial input.

3. Future Implications for the Supreme Court:

- The government could stack the courts with ideologically aligned judges, including the Supreme Court, which has often acted as a check on government power.

- Critics warn this could lead to erosion of judicial independence and enable authoritarian policies.

Why It’s Controversial

- Power Grab: Opponents argue it undermines democracy by letting politicians control judicial appointments, removing a key check on government power.

- Part of a Larger Overhaul: This is just one piece of Netanyahu’s broader plan, which includes weakening the Supreme Court’s power to strike down laws (override clause) and reducing judicial review.

- Protests & Opposition: The reform has triggered months of mass protests, with military reservists, business leaders, and legal experts warning of democratic backsliding.

- International Concerns: The U.S. and EU have expressed worries about Israel’s democratic stability.

Netanyahu’s Justification

- Supporters argue the reforms "restore democracy" by reducing what they see as an overly activist Supreme Court.

- They claim judges have too much power and are unelected, while the elected government should have more influence.

What’s Next?

- The opposition may challenge the law in the Supreme Court, leading to a constitutional crisis if the Court strikes it down and the government refuses to comply.

- Further reforms are expected, including laws to limit judicial review and weaken the attorney general’s authority.

This marks a historic shift in Israel’s governance, moving toward greater political control over the judiciary—a move critics compare to Hungary and Poland’s democratic erosion.

Comments

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Gaza and the Collapse of World Order: When the Guardian of Human Rights Sounds the Alarm

There are moments when the language of diplomacy fails, when caution becomes complicity, and when silence becomes an accomplice to destruction. On January 9, 2026, Agnès Callamard—Secretary General of Amnesty International—crossed that threshold. Her words were unambiguous, unprecedented, and devastating: The United States is destroying world order. Israel has been doing so for the last two years. Germany, through complicity and repression, is helping govern its demise. This was not activist rhetoric. It was a diagnosis from the very institution tasked with guarding the moral and legal architecture of the modern world. The Collapse of the Post-War Moral Architecture The international order that emerged after World War II was built on a promise: never again . Never again genocide. Never again collective punishment. Never again impunity for powerful states. That promise was codified in international law, human rights conventions, and multilateral institutions. But Gaza has...

Rebranding Genocide: When Killing Learns New Words

There are moments in history when crimes do not end — they simply learn new language. Gaza is living inside such a moment. The bombs have not stopped falling. The children have not stopped dying. The displaced have not stopped freezing in tents pitched atop rubble that was once their homes. What has changed is the vocabulary . And in the modern age, vocabulary is power . If you can rename atrocity, you can anesthetize conscience. First, it was called self-defense — a phrase emptied of meaning by its repetition. Then it became a war , despite the grotesque imbalance: one side armed with one of the most advanced militaries on earth, backed by the world’s most powerful empire ; the other a besieged civilian population without an army, navy, air force, tanks, or safe shelter. Now it is branded a ceasefire — a word invoked not to stop violence, but to conceal it. This is not peace. It is genocide with a quieter soundtrack. The Illusion of Restraint A slowed rate of killing is not m...

Citizens on Paper, Expendable in Practice Arab Israelis, October 7, and the Failure of International Law Inside the “Only Democracy”

Israel tells the world it is the only democracy in the Middle East . Democracies, we are reminded, protect all citizens equally—especially minorities—especially in times of crisis. Now look at Palestinian citizens of Israel , roughly 20% of the population , in the months following October 7 . Then ask: what exactly does citizenship mean when the state will not protect your life? The Forgotten Fifth of the Population Arab citizens of Israel vote. They hold passports. They pay taxes. They are citizens in the narrow, bureaucratic sense. But international law does not define citizenship by paperwork. It defines it by: Equal protection Non-discrimination The right to life Equal access to justice On those measures, Israel is not merely failing—it is structurally violating its obligations . A Murder Epidemic the State Chooses Not to Stop Long before October 7, Arab towns inside Israel were drowning in violence: Illegal weapons proliferated Organized crime flourished ...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog