Columbia President ( Katrina Armstrong) Is Replaced as Trump Threatens University’s Funding. Key Points. NYTimes

Key Points & Further Details on Columbia University Leadership Change

1. Presidential Change at Columbia University

Katrina Armstrong stepped down as interim president of Columbia University.
Claire Shipman, a journalist and Columbia alumna, was named acting president.
Armstrong’s departure marks Columbia’s third leadership change since August 2024.

2. Trigger for Leadership Change

The Trump administration threatened to withhold $400 million in federal funding from Columbia.
This funding is roughly 20% of the university’s operating revenue.
The university ultimately complied with government demands, causing internal and external backlash.

3. Government Demands & Columbia’s Compliance

Columbia agreed to:
- Employ 36 campus safety officers with arrest powers.
- Adopt a formal definition of antisemitism.
- Review admissions policies.
- Increase oversight of its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department.
These changes sparked faculty and student outrage, particularly over concerns about academic freedom and law enforcement presence on campus.

4. National Context & Broader Concerns

The Trump administration has been investigating multiple universities over alleged antisemitism, campus protests, and other issues.
University of Pennsylvania also had $175 million in federal funding withheld due to allowing a transgender athlete on its swim team in 2022.
Other universities fear similar government interventions, especially since Columbia did not legally challenge the funding threats.

5. Political & Institutional Reactions

Columbia’s faculty and students condemned the university’s compliance with the government’s demands.
Higher education leaders worry that this sets a precedent for federal intervention in academic governance.
Before Armstrong’s exit, the Trump administration praised her handling of antisemitism concerns.

6. Future Implications

Uncertainty remains over whether Columbia will fully regain its federal funding.
The case highlights tensions between universities and government over academic freedom, campus safety, and funding pressures.
Shipman’s leadership will likely focus on navigating these challenges while stabilizing the university.

Ms. Claire Shipman, a prominent journalist and Columbia University trustee, has been appointed as the interim president of Columbia University following the resignation of Dr. Nemat Tallat Shafik’s predecessor, Dr. Lee C. Bollinger. Her appointment comes at a time of heightened tension between the U.S. government and Columbia over issues such as campus free speech, protests related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, and federal scrutiny of university policies.

(Note : Below menrioned introduction of Ms Shipman is not part of NYTimes's article. )

Background on Claire Shipman:

- A seasoned journalist with experience at ABC News, CNN, and Good Morning America, Shipman has co-authored books on women’s leadership (The Confidence Code).

- She has served on Columbia’s Board of Trustees since 2018 and is seen as a stabilizing figure amid recent turmoil.

- Unlike traditional academic leaders, Shipman brings a media and governance background rather than a scholarly one, which may influence her approach to public relations and crisis management.

Context of Her Appointment:

1. Tensions with the U.S. Government:

- Columbia has faced Congressional scrutiny over allegations of antisemitism and handling of pro-Palestinian protests.

- The House Committee on Education has pressured Columbia (and other Ivy League schools) over campus climate, with some lawmakers threatening federal funding cuts.

- Shipman’s media expertise may help navigate public and political backlash.

2. Resignation of Ms. Armstrong (Assuming a Key Administrator):

- If referencing a recent resignation (e.g., a dean or high-ranking official), it suggests internal strife over leadership decisions.

- Shipman’s interim role may involve stabilizing administration morale while Columbia searches for a permanent president.

Challenges Ahead:

- Balancing Free Speech & Federal Compliance: Columbia must address concerns about antisemitism while protecting protest rights.

- Restoring Trust: After protests, congressional hearings, and leadership changes, Shipman must reassure students, faculty, and donors.

- Short-Term Role: As an interim, her focus may be on crisis management rather than long-term policy shifts.

Claire Shipman’s appointment reflects Columbia’s need for a communicator and bridge-builder during a turbulent period. Her lack of academic presidency experience could be a hurdle, but her media savvy and governance background may help navigate political and public relations challenges. The coming months will test her ability to lead amid federal pressure and campus divisions.

Comments

Gaza’s Medical Apocalypse: Numbers, Neglect, and the Farce of “Access”

If you ever needed proof that statistics can be more damning than bombs, look at Gaza’s health crisis . Behind the headlines and hashtags lies a cascade of bodies and broken systems. We have numbers, we have reports, we have PDFs— and yet the world stares, unmoved, at the collapse. Below is your ruthless, numbers-soaked guide to the suffering —and the institutional failure—behind Gaza’s medical implosion . 1. The Health System Is Already Dead. We’re Just Counting the Corpse. According to WHO, “The Gaza Strip faces an unprecedented humanitarian crisis with rising mortality and widespread displacement.” Between 1 January and 31 August 2024 , local health authorities reported 18,900 deaths and 38,916 injuries . Women, children, and the elderly account for over 50 % of fatal casualties . More than 53 % of Gaza’s 36 hospitals were non-functional as of August 2024, and many of the partially functioning ones lacked adequate water or relied entirely on fuel generators. ...

The Ceasefire of Exhaustion: When Empires Collapse from Within

By Malik Mukhtar — ainnbeen.blogspot.com Two years after Gaza was first set on fire , the war that began with biblical vengeance has stumbled to an exhausted ceasefire . On October 9, 2025 , Israel and Hamas — after endless carnage, famine, and rubble — have signed the first phase of a ceasefire agreement mediated in Sharm el-Sheikh . Trump called it a “ historic peace plan. ” History may call it a truce of attrition — a war that collapsed under the weight of its own hubris. What the Ceasefire Says — and What It Doesn’t Under the agreement, Israeli forces are to pull back to a designated “yellow line” within 24 hours of cabinet ratification. Hamas, in turn, will release all remaining hostages — alive or dead — within 72 hours after the withdrawal. Israel will free about 2,000 Palestinian prisoners, though it made sure to exclude political figures like Marwan Barghouti , whose freedom would remind the world that Palestine still breathes. Humanitarian convoys — food,...

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed.

Delivering the Dead: How the World Watches Gaza Bleed “ I delivered a beheaded woman who was nine months pregnant. ” That’s not a horror-film script. That’s not medieval history. That is the testimony of an Australian medic standing in a Gaza hospital in 2025, describing what it means to “ practice medicine ” under Israeli bombardment. A nine-months-pregnant woman , decapitated , her body torn open so that the child she carried could be pulled out lifeless — and somehow this is still not enough to shake the comfortable democracies of the West into anything resembling a conscience. We should probably give the Nobel Prize for Creative Euphemism to the politicians who still call this “self-defense.” After all, there’s nothing quite as defensive as severing the head of an expectant mother and forcing foreign doctors to deliver her dead child in the rubble of what used to be a hospital . Bravo, civilization . The tragedy is not just the atrocity itself. It’s the smug perfo...

The Veil Gets Thicker: How “Democracy” Is Being Used to Suppress Solidarity.

There’s a whisper among the ideals Europe claims to represent: freedom, human rights, assembly . But lately, those whispers are being drowned out —by batons, by laws, by arrests . Pro-Palestinian protestors are being met not with dialogue or understanding , but with the brute choreography of state power. Democracy is no longer just veiled . It is draped in shame. Recent Snapshots: When Solidarity Becomes a Crime These are not isolated incidents. These are signals. They tell us where the balance has shifted—and how. UK — The Ban, the Proscription, the Mass Arrests Palestine Action Proscribed Under Terrorism Act In July 2025 the UK government declared Palestine Action a proscribed organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000 . From that moment, supporting the group—by words or peaceful symbolic action—became criminalized. 466 Arrested at Parliament Square On August 9, 2025 , some 466 people were arrested in London at Parliament Square for a protest against the Pales...

Britain’s Recognition of Palestine: A Century of Complicity in Disguise.

So we’ve reached this moment: Keir Starmer’s UK “ recognises the State of Palestine. ” Applause lines up. Speeches made. Headlines dazzled. But behind the pomp, the guns, the exports, the intelligence, the training — history rings out in mocking laughter. Because Britain has been complicit since day one. This recognition is not redemption . It’s theatre. 1. The Original Sin: Balfour Declaration Let’s go back. Because if you don’t know your history, you’ll be fooled by the future. On 2 November 1917 , Arthur James Balfour (Britain’s Foreign Secretary) wrote to Lord Rothschild, and officially declared: “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object , it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine , or the rights and political sta...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog