Skip to main content

Columbia President ( Katrina Armstrong) Is Replaced as Trump Threatens University’s Funding. Key Points. NYTimes



Key Points & Further Details on Columbia University Leadership Change

1. Presidential Change at Columbia University

  • Katrina Armstrong stepped down as interim president of Columbia University.
  • Claire Shipman, a journalist and Columbia alumna, was named acting president.
  • Armstrong’s departure marks Columbia’s third leadership change since August 2024.

2. Trigger for Leadership Change

  • The Trump administration threatened to withhold $400 million in federal funding from Columbia.
  • This funding is roughly 20% of the university’s operating revenue.
  • The university ultimately complied with government demands, causing internal and external backlash.

3. Government Demands & Columbia’s Compliance

  • Columbia agreed to:
    • Employ 36 campus safety officers with arrest powers.
    • Adopt a formal definition of antisemitism.
    • Review admissions policies.
    • Increase oversight of its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department.
  • These changes sparked faculty and student outrage, particularly over concerns about academic freedom and law enforcement presence on campus.

4. National Context & Broader Concerns

  • The Trump administration has been investigating multiple universities over alleged antisemitism, campus protests, and other issues.
  • University of Pennsylvania also had $175 million in federal funding withheld due to allowing a transgender athlete on its swim team in 2022.
  • Other universities fear similar government interventions, especially since Columbia did not legally challenge the funding threats.

5. Political & Institutional Reactions

  • Columbia’s faculty and students condemned the university’s compliance with the government’s demands.
  • Higher education leaders worry that this sets a precedent for federal intervention in academic governance.
  • Before Armstrong’s exit, the Trump administration praised her handling of antisemitism concerns.

6. Future Implications

  • Uncertainty remains over whether Columbia will fully regain its federal funding.
  • The case highlights tensions between universities and government over academic freedom, campus safety, and funding pressures.
  • Shipman’s leadership will likely focus on navigating these challenges while stabilizing the university.

Ms. Claire Shipman, a prominent journalist and Columbia University trustee, has been appointed as the interim president of Columbia University following the resignation of Dr. Nemat Tallat Shafik’s predecessor, Dr. Lee C. Bollinger. Her appointment comes at a time of heightened tension between the U.S. government and Columbia over issues such as campus free speech, protests related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, and federal scrutiny of university policies.  


(Note : Below menrioned introduction of Ms  Shipman  is not part of NYTimes's article. )

Background on Claire Shipman:

- A seasoned journalist with experience at ABC News, CNN, and Good Morning America, Shipman has co-authored books on women’s leadership (The Confidence Code).

- She has served on Columbia’s Board of Trustees since 2018 and is seen as a stabilizing figure amid recent turmoil.  

- Unlike traditional academic leaders, Shipman brings a media and governance background rather than a scholarly one, which may influence her approach to public relations and crisis management.  


Context of Her Appointment:  

1. Tensions with the U.S. Government:

   - Columbia has faced Congressional scrutiny over allegations of antisemitism and handling of pro-Palestinian protests.  

   - The House Committee on Education has pressured Columbia (and other Ivy League schools) over campus climate, with some lawmakers threatening federal funding cuts.  

   - Shipman’s media expertise may help navigate public and political backlash.  


2. Resignation of Ms. Armstrong (Assuming a Key Administrator): 

   - If referencing a recent resignation (e.g., a dean or high-ranking official), it suggests internal strife over leadership decisions.  

   - Shipman’s interim role may involve stabilizing administration morale while Columbia searches for a permanent president.


Challenges Ahead:

- Balancing Free Speech & Federal Compliance: Columbia must address concerns about antisemitism while protecting protest rights.  

- Restoring Trust: After protests, congressional hearings, and leadership changes, Shipman must reassure students, faculty, and donors.

- Short-Term Role: As an interim, her focus may be on crisis management rather than long-term policy shifts.  

Claire Shipman’s appointment reflects Columbia’s need for a communicator and bridge-builder during a turbulent period. Her lack of academic presidency experience could be a hurdle, but her media savvy and governance background may help navigate political and public relations challenges. The coming months will test her ability to lead amid federal pressure and campus divisions.  






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Warning Comes from the General Moshe Ya’alon, Jewish Supremacy, and the Echo Nobody Wanted to Hear

History has a cruel sense of irony. Sometimes the most devastating indictments do not come from the oppressed, the bombed, the buried, or the silenced—but from the very architects of power who once swore they were different. This week, that indictment came from Moshe Ya’alon : former Israeli Defense Minister, former IDF Chief of Staff, lifelong pillar of Israel’s security establishment. Not a dissident poet. Not a radical academic. Not a Palestinian survivor. A general. And what he said shattered the last polite illusion. “ The ideology of Jewish supremacy that has become dominant in the Israeli government is reminiscent of Nazi race theory.” Pause there. Sit with it. This was not shouted at a protest . It was not scribbled on a placard. It was written calmly, deliberately, after attending a Holocaust Remembrance ceremony —then reading reports of Jewish settlers attacking Palestinians , blocking ambulances , fracturing skulls , burning homes. Never Again, apparently, now ...

A Rabbi Against the State: When Faith Refuses Power

In a world where identity is weaponized and religion is drafted into political armies, the sight of an ultra-Orthodox rabbi standing beside Palestinian flags unsettles nearly everyone. Yet there stands — black coat, beard, sidelocks — calmly declaring something that scrambles modern assumptions: “ Judaism is not Zionism.” For him, this is not rebellion . It is obedience . Affiliated with , a small and highly controversial Haredi sect, Rabbi Beck represents a theological current that predates modern nationalism. His argument is not secular. It is not progressive. It is not post-modern. It is ancient . And that is precisely the point. The Interview That Disturbs Categories In one widely circulated long-form interview, the exchange unfolds with almost disarming simplicity. Interviewer: Rabbi Beck, how can you oppose Israel as a Jewish rabbi? Rabbi Beck: Judaism and Zionism are two completely different things. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a political movement founded little more ...

“Not Auschwitz — Yet Still Genocide”: When Israeli Holocaust Historians Break the Silence on Gaza

  There are moments in history when the most unsettling truths do not come from one’s enemies, but from within. From those who know the past most intimately. From those whose moral authority is built not on ideology, but on memory. In December 2025, two of Israel’s most respected Holocaust and genocide scholars— Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem—published a deeply unsettling opinion article in Haaretz . What they argued was not casual, rhetorical, or activist hyperbole. It was a grave historical judgment. Their conclusion was stark: What is happening in Gaza is not Auschwitz. But it belongs to the same family of crimes: genocide. Why This Voice Matters Blatman and Goldberg are not marginal figures. They are historians whose professional lives have been devoted to studying Nazi crimes, genocide mechanisms, memory, and moral responsibility . Their scholarship is rooted in the very catastrophe that shaped modern Jewish iden...

Even the Dead Are Not Safe: How Power Desecrates Graves and Calls It Security

  There is a final dignity that every civilization, every faith, every moral tradition claims to respect: the dignity of the dead. In Gaza and the West Bank, even that has been revoked. Homes can be flattened. Children can be starved. Hospitals can be reduced to ash. These crimes, we are told, are “tragic necessities.” But graves ? What threat does a corpse pose to a modern army armed with drones , tanks , and nuclear ambiguity ? Apparently, enough to be bulldozed. Graves as Enemy Infrastructure According to detailed reporting by Al Jazeera , Israeli forces in Gaza did not merely fight the living — they waged war on cemeteries . Tombstones were crushed. Graves were excavated . Human remains were scattered, mixed, lost . Families returned not to mourning, but to forensic horror: bones without names, names without bodies. This was not collateral damage . This was not crossfire. This was methodical excavation . Heavy machinery was deployed to retrieve the body of one ...

Don’t Spoil the Show: Gaza, Davos, and the Business Class of Peace

There is a rule at Davos—unwritten, but strictly enforced. Reality is bad for business. Yossi Alpher learned this the hard way. Sitting on a panel at a luxury resort near the Dead Sea, surrounded by ministers, executives, and conflict “experts,” he made the unforgivable mistake of speaking honestly. Grim facts. Grim assessments. No PowerPoint optimism. No Riviera renderings. No applause. A prominent Israeli industrialist later pulled him aside and explained the crime: “ Don’t spoil the show . The idea is to radiate optimism that nourishes an investment climate . It’s all about business. No room for realism .” That sentence may be the most accurate peace-process doctrine of the 21st century. Phase II: Now With Billionaires Fast forward to Davos again. This time, the stage is Gaza—or rather, Gaza™ , the investment opportunity. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” staffed by billionaires and brand managers of global destruction , announces Phase II of a Gaza peace plan with all the s...