Skip to main content

Columbia President ( Katrina Armstrong) Is Replaced as Trump Threatens University’s Funding. Key Points. NYTimes



Key Points & Further Details on Columbia University Leadership Change

1. Presidential Change at Columbia University

  • Katrina Armstrong stepped down as interim president of Columbia University.
  • Claire Shipman, a journalist and Columbia alumna, was named acting president.
  • Armstrong’s departure marks Columbia’s third leadership change since August 2024.

2. Trigger for Leadership Change

  • The Trump administration threatened to withhold $400 million in federal funding from Columbia.
  • This funding is roughly 20% of the university’s operating revenue.
  • The university ultimately complied with government demands, causing internal and external backlash.

3. Government Demands & Columbia’s Compliance

  • Columbia agreed to:
    • Employ 36 campus safety officers with arrest powers.
    • Adopt a formal definition of antisemitism.
    • Review admissions policies.
    • Increase oversight of its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department.
  • These changes sparked faculty and student outrage, particularly over concerns about academic freedom and law enforcement presence on campus.

4. National Context & Broader Concerns

  • The Trump administration has been investigating multiple universities over alleged antisemitism, campus protests, and other issues.
  • University of Pennsylvania also had $175 million in federal funding withheld due to allowing a transgender athlete on its swim team in 2022.
  • Other universities fear similar government interventions, especially since Columbia did not legally challenge the funding threats.

5. Political & Institutional Reactions

  • Columbia’s faculty and students condemned the university’s compliance with the government’s demands.
  • Higher education leaders worry that this sets a precedent for federal intervention in academic governance.
  • Before Armstrong’s exit, the Trump administration praised her handling of antisemitism concerns.

6. Future Implications

  • Uncertainty remains over whether Columbia will fully regain its federal funding.
  • The case highlights tensions between universities and government over academic freedom, campus safety, and funding pressures.
  • Shipman’s leadership will likely focus on navigating these challenges while stabilizing the university.

Ms. Claire Shipman, a prominent journalist and Columbia University trustee, has been appointed as the interim president of Columbia University following the resignation of Dr. Nemat Tallat Shafik’s predecessor, Dr. Lee C. Bollinger. Her appointment comes at a time of heightened tension between the U.S. government and Columbia over issues such as campus free speech, protests related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, and federal scrutiny of university policies.  


(Note : Below menrioned introduction of Ms  Shipman  is not part of NYTimes's article. )

Background on Claire Shipman:

- A seasoned journalist with experience at ABC News, CNN, and Good Morning America, Shipman has co-authored books on women’s leadership (The Confidence Code).

- She has served on Columbia’s Board of Trustees since 2018 and is seen as a stabilizing figure amid recent turmoil.  

- Unlike traditional academic leaders, Shipman brings a media and governance background rather than a scholarly one, which may influence her approach to public relations and crisis management.  


Context of Her Appointment:  

1. Tensions with the U.S. Government:

   - Columbia has faced Congressional scrutiny over allegations of antisemitism and handling of pro-Palestinian protests.  

   - The House Committee on Education has pressured Columbia (and other Ivy League schools) over campus climate, with some lawmakers threatening federal funding cuts.  

   - Shipman’s media expertise may help navigate public and political backlash.  


2. Resignation of Ms. Armstrong (Assuming a Key Administrator): 

   - If referencing a recent resignation (e.g., a dean or high-ranking official), it suggests internal strife over leadership decisions.  

   - Shipman’s interim role may involve stabilizing administration morale while Columbia searches for a permanent president.


Challenges Ahead:

- Balancing Free Speech & Federal Compliance: Columbia must address concerns about antisemitism while protecting protest rights.  

- Restoring Trust: After protests, congressional hearings, and leadership changes, Shipman must reassure students, faculty, and donors.

- Short-Term Role: As an interim, her focus may be on crisis management rather than long-term policy shifts.  

Claire Shipman’s appointment reflects Columbia’s need for a communicator and bridge-builder during a turbulent period. Her lack of academic presidency experience could be a hurdle, but her media savvy and governance background may help navigate political and public relations challenges. The coming months will test her ability to lead amid federal pressure and campus divisions.  






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

  By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...