Skip to main content

Chris Hedges' essay The Empire Self-Destructs. Key Points.

 


Breakdown of the main points in Chris Hedges' essay The Empire Self-Destructs, with further details:


1. The Decline of Empire: Hallmarks of Collapse

Hedges argues that the U.S. is exhibiting classic symptoms of a declining empire: corruption, military failures, economic instability, and increasing authoritarianism.

Historical comparisons are drawn to the fall of Rome, the Habsburgs, and other collapsed empires.



2. The Cannibalization of Government

Billionaires, Christian fundamentalists, and other elites are dismantling the U.S. government for personal and ideological gain.

The destruction of state institutions weakens national stability, leading to self-inflicted wounds that hasten collapse.


3. Retreat into Delusion

U.S. leadership, particularly under Trump, is detached from reality, replacing facts with conspiracy theories, religious extremism, and empty rhetoric.

This results in incoherent policies, such as withdrawing from international agreements and sanctioning international legal bodies.


4. The Rise of Christian Fascism

Dominionist theology drives a movement that seeks to transform the U.S. into a theocratic state.

This ideology is hostile to secular democracy and aims to reshape the judiciary, government, and education system under Christian nationalist control.

Inspired by Nazi thinkers, its adherents promote racism, misogyny, and homophobia.


5. Language Manipulation & Logocide

Christian nationalists redefine key words (e.g., "liberty" means obedience to Christ, not personal freedom).

This manipulation of language helps them mask their authoritarian intentions.


6. Scapegoating and the Turn to Repression

As the empire declines, leaders will blame phantom enemiesforeign adversaries, internal dissenters, "woke" ideology—and use state violence to suppress opposition.

Climate disasters will further strain resources, leading to harsher crackdowns.


7. The Illusion of American Foreign Aid

U.S. foreign aid is a tool for maintaining global dominance, not benevolence.

Programs like USAID often serve corporate interests and suppress opposition to U.S. hegemony.

Similar economic policies are used domestically, transferring wealth from the poor to the ultra-rich.


8. The Role of Military and Economic Exploitation

The military-industrial complex enforces U.S. dominance, maintaining global sweatshops, extracting resources, and destabilizing resistant governments.

The same tactics used abroad—surveillance, militarization, economic manipulation—are now being applied domestically.


9. The Coming Economic Crash

The U.S. economy is sustained by the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency, but reckless policies threaten this privilege.

If the dollar loses its dominance, economic depression will follow, making global military operations unsustainable.

This will accelerate the collapse of the empire and usher in hyper-nationalist authoritarianism.


10. The Historical Precedent for Rapid Decline

Hedges cites historian Alfred McCoy’s analysis of how empires collapse quickly once their financial foundations erode.

If McCoy's prediction holds, the U.S. could collapse within decades, much like the Soviet Union or British Empire.


11. Domestic Repression & the New Dark Age

As the empire weakens, the state will turn its tools of global control—mass surveillance, militarized policing, imprisonment—against its own citizens.

The elites will continue extracting wealth from the dying system while the general population suffers.


---

The overarching message is that the U.S. empire is unraveling from within due to greed, ideological extremism, and a refusal to acknowledge its declining global power. The collapse will not be graceful, and it will likely lead to severe repression and suffering both domestically and abroad.


Transcript from the Essay.

"The demise of the United States as the preeminent global power could come far more quickly than anyone imagines,” the historian Alfred W. McCoy writes in his book “In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of US Global Power”:


"Despite the aura of omnipotence empires often project, most are surprisingly fragile, lacking the inherent strength of even a modest nation-state. Indeed, a glance at their history should remind us that the greatest of them are susceptible to collapse from diverse causes, with fiscal pressures usually a prime factor. For the better part of two centuries, the security and prosperity of the homeland has been the main objective for most stable states, making foreign or imperial adventures an expendable option, usually allocated no more than 5 percent of the domestic budget. Without the financing that arises almost organically inside a sovereign nation, empires are famously predatory in their relentless hunt for plunder or profitwitness the Atlantic slave trade, Belgium’s rubber lust in the Congo, British India’s opium commerce, the Third Reich’s rape of Europe, or the Soviet exploitation of Eastern Europe.

When revenues shrink or collapse, McCoy points out, “empires become brittle.”

Source:

https://open.substack.com/pub/chrishedges/p/the-empire-self_destructsutm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=pwddk



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Never Attack a Revolution—Unless It’s Gaza

  By Malik Mukhtar There is a peculiar confidence that comes with being wrong for decades and still being invited back to explain the world. Yossi Alpher—former Mossad official, veteran intelligence analyst, and institutional voice of Israeli “realism”—offers us precisely that confidence in his January 12, 2026 reflections on Iran. His message, distilled, is simple: things are complicated, revolutions are unpredictable, and humility is required . This is sound advice. It just arrives from the wrong mouth, at the wrong time, over the wrong bodies. Because while Alpher warns us—correctly—not to “attack a revolution, ” Israel has spent the last two years doing something far more obscene : attacking a trapped civilian population with no revolution , no army , no air force, no escape —and calling it self-defense . Intelligence: A Sacred Failure, Repeated Faithfully Alpher recalls, with admirable candor, the catastrophic ignorance of Western and Israeli intelligence during...

Gaza Beyond the Alibi of Hamas: Genocide as Method, Silence as Accomplice.( From Chris Hedges report )

We are the most informed generation in human history—and perhaps the least disturbed by what we know. From the first missiles that struck Gaza’s residential blocks to the slow starvation that followed, everything was visible. Every destroyed home. Every burned hospital. Every child pulled from rubble. And yet, the global emotional temperature barely rose. In an age of total visibility, feeling itself has become scarce. Watching has replaced witnessing. Knowing has replaced responsibility. This moral numbness is not accidental. It is cultivated . And at the center of this cultivation stands a single word, endlessly repeated, ritually invoked, and strategically deployed: Hamas . Hamas has functioned not as an explanation, but as an alibi. The Choice Was Announcedk From Day One From the earliest days of Israel’s assault, the policy was articulated with chilling clarity: Gaza’s population would be given two options— stay and starve, or leave . This was not the language of counte...

Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja: How Ethnic Cleansing Happens Without a Declaration

Ethnic cleansing rarely announces itself with sirens or official decrees. More often, it arrives quietly—through sleepless nights, smashed water tanks, stolen sheep, armed men grazing livestock on stolen land, and the slow realization that survival itself has become impossible. On 8 January 2026 , Israel completed what it had been methodically engineering for months: the forcible transfer of 26 Palestinian families from the shepherding community of Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja in the southern Jordan Valley. That is 124 people , including 59 children , pushed from homes their families had lived in for decades—not by a single evacuation order, but by sustained terror. This is not a humanitarian crisis caused by “clashes.” It is not a byproduct of war. It is a deliberate policy outcome . Violence as Policy, Militias as Instruments Ras ‘Ein al-‘Auja lies about ten kilometers north of Jericho. It is the last remaining shepherding community in the southern Jordan Valley , and the largest sti...

Ana Kasparian: The Voice That Won’t Be Silent — A Call for Truth in an Age of Power

  Ana Kasparian is one of the most recognized and outspoken voices in contemporary political media. As a co-host of The Young Turks — a trailblazing online news and commentary program — she has spent nearly two decades dissecting U.S. politics, media, power, and foreign policy with unapologetic clarity and fierce conviction. She is not just a commentator — she is a truth-seeker who challenges power at every turn , refusing to soften her words for comfort. Schooled in journalism and political science, Ana’s commentary continues to mobilize millions, especially younger generations who feel unheard in mainstream discourse. A Voice Against the Status Quo Ana’s rhetoric can be bold, controversial, and deeply passionate — because she refuses to accept narratives that obscure the underlying truth about power and influence. On American democracy and foreign policy, she strikes at the heart of what many hesitate to articulate: “ We don’t actually live in a true democracy here in t...

Dr. Randa Abdel Fattah. De-Invited by Association: When Grief Becomes a Pretext and Palestinian Identity a Liability

How Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah Was Silenced in the Name of “Sensitivity” In a remarkable feat of moral gymnastics, Australia’s literary establishment has once again demonstrated how grief can be weaponised, principles suspended, and Palestinian identity rendered dangerously “inappropriate ” —all in the name of cultural sensitivity. Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah , a respected author, academic, and public intellectual, was quietly de-invited from Adelaide Writers’ Week following the Bondi Junction massacre. Not because she had any connection—real, implied, or imagined—to the atrocity. Not because she endorsed violence. Not because she violated any law or ethical standard. But because, apparently, the mere presence of a Palestinian Muslim woman who speaks about justice is now considered culturally unsafe during national mourning . One wonders: unsafe for whom? The Logic of the Absurd Festival organisers were careful—almost impressively so—to state that Dr. Abdel-Fattah had nothing to do wi...