"States Don’t Have a Right to Exist. People Do." By Peter Beinart. NYTimes .Jan. 27, 2025. Key Points.

Key Points:

1. Consensus in Washington:

Bipartisan agreement exists among U.S. leaders that Israel has a right to exist, as evidenced by statements from figures across the political spectrum.

In 2023, the House affirmed Israel's right to exist by a vote of 412-1.

2. Questioning Israel’s Form of Governance:

The usual focus of U.S. leaders on individual rights contrasts with their support for Israel as a Jewish state, which raises concerns about equal rights for all under its control.

The better question, according to the author, is whether Israel, as a Jewish state, adequately protects the rights of all individuals under its jurisdiction. The conclusion is that it does not.

3. Comparison with Other Nations:

U.S. leaders support democratic reforms in oppressive regimes like Iran and China but exempt Israel from similar scrutiny.

This double standard highlights a focus on the consent of the governed in other states but not in Israel.

4. Rights Denial and Discrimination:

Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank live under Israeli control without citizenship or equal rights.

Even Palestinian citizens of Israel face systemic discrimination in land allocation and representation.

5. American Jewish Leadership and Idolatry of the State:

American Jewish leaders insist on Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state, despite contradictions with democratic principles.

Jewish tradition, which emphasizes skepticism of state power, is at odds with the veneration of Israel as a political entity.

6. Human Rights Abuses:

Israel has been accused of apartheid by its own human rights organization, B’Tselem, and has seen increasing settler violence against Palestinians.

The Gaza conflict illustrates the dangers of denying basic rights, perpetuating cycles of violence and instability.

7. Implications for Jewish Safety:

Denying Palestinians representation and rights leads to violence, endangering both Jews and Palestinians.

The emphasis on maintaining Israel as a Jewish state undermines the principle of equality and fuels ongoing conflict.

Conclusion:

The author argues for a rethinking of Israel’s character, emphasizing the protection of all individuals under its control.

Worship of the state as an absolute value can justify harmful actions and perpetuate inequality.

Source:

NYTimes

Comments

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

When a Constitution Becomes a Decorative Document America’s Latest War, and the Curious Death of Accountability

There is an imperial comedy unfolding before the world — dark enough to be tragedy, absurd enough to be satire. This is, after all, the very “model democracy” United States has spent decades promising to export to humanity — by missile, by occupation, by sanctions, by “shock and awe,” by solemn lectures on liberty delivered from polished podiums standing atop broken nations. This was the sermon preached to Iraq. Imposed on Afghanistan. Invoked amid the destruction of Libya . Entangled in the agony of Syria. Echoed through the devastation of Yemen. The doctrine was always wrapped in noble language: Rule of law. Democratic institutions. Constitutional order. Checks and balances. How magnificent those words sound — right up until power decides they are optional at home. What a remarkable export product: A democracy where Congress yields, courts hesitate, executive power expands, wars begin first and legal arguments arrive later — wrapped in flags, marketed...

The Confession Without Consequence When Empire Admits the Crime… and Funds It Anyway

There are moments in history when power accidentally tells the truth. Not because conscience triumphs. Not because morality suddenly awakens. But because the wreckage becomes too vast to keep describing as “complicated.” That moment arrived when — a pillar of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, veteran diplomat, architect of negotiations, insider to empire’s machinery — uttered words that would once have been politically unthinkable: “ Prime Minister Netanyahu has led us down a road — and we have been part of it — that has, in essence, created a genocide in Gaza that has destabilize d the Middle East.” Read that again. Not they . We. Not Israel alone . We have been part of it. That single phrase — “we have been part of it” — may be one of the most consequential admissions made by a former senior American official in modern Middle Eastern history. For decades, Washington supplied the bombs, shielded the diplomacy, vetoed accountability, framed slaughter as...

When the Readers Move Ahead of the Columnist

There is something quietly seismic happening—not in the corridors of power, not in carefully worded opinion columns, but in the comment sections beneath them. While attempts to diagnose where Israel “lost its way,” the readers seem to be asking a far more unsettling question: What if it didn’t lose its way at all? What if this is the way? For decades, the comforting narrative was simple: the problem was leadership. Replace , and the moral arc would gently correct itself. Peace would again become plausible. Restraint would return. The “real Israel” would re-emerge. But the readers are no longer convinced. They are pointing to something deeper—something less convenient. Not a deviation. A pattern. Not an exception. A structure. Because when policies persist across decades, across governments, across crises—at what point do we stop calling them mistakes and start calling them design? The Quiet Collapse of a Narrative One reader puts it bluntly: Palestinians have alr...

At 78, a Nation at War With Itself

There is a haunting irony in watching a state built on the promise of refuge become trapped in fear of its own reflection. For decades, **** was one of the men entrusted with Israel’s sword — soldier, commander, prime minister, architect of its security doctrine. Not a radical voice. Not an outsider. Not a dissident shouting from the margins. An insider. And when insiders begin speaking the language of alarm, history listens differently . His warning is not that Israel may be destroyed by rockets, tunnels, militias, or regional enemies. His warning is more unsettling: that Israel may survive every external war — and lose itself from within. That is a far more tragic form of defeat. A nation can repel missiles and still watch its institutions hollow out . A nation can dominate battlefields and still become morally exhausted. A nation can claim victory abroad while quietly burying democracy at home . This is the paradox now confronting Israel at 78: militarily formidable, technologic...

Ainnbeen

Search This Blog