Skip to main content

Hypothetical, but Plausible: How to End the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict for Good, Right Now," Dahlia Scheindlin. Key Points



 In her article titled "Hypothetical, but Plausible: How to End the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict for Good, Right Now," Dahlia Scheindlin explores a scenario where Israel leverages a Gaza ceasefire as a catalyst for a comprehensive political resolution to the longstanding conflict. She suggests that instead of using military actions to justify territorial annexationsa pattern observed in the past—Israel could seize this moment to initiate a peace process involving both Palestinian leadership and international stakeholders.


Scheindlin's proposal aligns with the concept of a two-state confederation, where Israel and Palestine exist as two sovereign states within a single territorial unit, maintaining open borders and shared institutions. This model acknowledges the deep connections both peoples have to the entire land and seeks to balance Israeli security concerns with Palestinian aspirations for statehood and equality. 


The envisioned plan includes several key components:

Establishment of Two Sovereign States: Israel and Palestine would be recognized as independent, sovereign nations, coexisting within agreed-upon borders.


Open Borders and Freedom of Movement: Both states would maintain open borders, allowing citizens to move freely throughout the shared territory, reflecting the intertwined nature of their societies.


Shared Institutions: Certain institutions, particularly those managing resources and infrastructure that affect both populations, would be jointly administered to ensure equitable access and cooperation.


Security Cooperation: While each state would have its own security apparatus, there would be a framework for collaboration to address mutual security concerns, aiming to build trust and ensure the safety of all citizens.


Jerusalem as a Shared Capital: Jerusalem would serve as the capital for both states, with arrangements to ensure access and respect for the religious and cultural significance it holds for both peoples.

This approach draws inspiration from existing proposals and movements advocating for a confederation model, such as "A Land for All," which promotes a two-state confederation based on shared principles of equality, freedom, and dignity. 

By adopting this strategy, Scheindlin argues that Israel could transform a temporary ceasefire into a lasting peace, addressing the core issues of the conflict through political agreement rather than continued military engagement.


(The views about the Two-State Confederation are entirely those of the author, Ms. Dahlia Scheindlin. The blogger remains neutral on this perspective.)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐Ÿ—️ Corporate Complicity in Genocide: The Global Economy Behind Gaza’s Ruin.

๐Ÿ“… July 5, 2025 “We are witnessing not just genocide in Gaza—but a genocide made profitable.” — UN Special Rapporteur, A/HRC/59/23 “This report is written from the heart of darkness . It is penned with a broken hand from a broken land for a broken people . But its words are not broken . They are the words of law and of longing . They are the words of those who are not yet silenced . It is written for Palestinians , first and foremost. It is also addressed to those who remain silent , indifferent or complicit . And it is a call to action for those who are not.” — Introduction, UN Report A/HRC/59/23 In an unprecedented and unflinching report to the UN Human Rights Council, the Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory has laid bare the truth that much of the world’s corporate, academic, and financial architecture is actively complicit in Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and now, genocide in Gaza. This isn’t just about military aggression . This is about the mac...

๐Ÿ’” One Eye for Gaza: Hannah Thomas and the Price of Speaking Truth

๐Ÿ–‹️ By Malik Mukhtar ๐Ÿ“ ainnbeen.blogspot.com | ๐Ÿ—“️ June 29, 2025 She stood on the pavement—Hannah Thomas, lawyer, activist, former Greens candidate. She stood—holding no weapon, only a banner and a conscience. She stood—outside a factory that allegedly helps plate the steel for F-35 jets now raining hell on Gaza. And for that—Australian police slammed her to the ground. Now, she may never see from her right eye again. Let that sentence burn into your mind: “She may lose her sight—for standing against genocide.” ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ In Gaza, Eyes Are Lost Forever In Gaza, there are no surgeons left for eyes. Eyes are buried beneath concrete. Eyes were starved shut. Eyes were blinded by phosphorus, smoke, dust. Children in Gaza have forgotten what it means to look up without fear. And still, the bombs fall. From October 7, 2023 to now, tens of thousands dead—many torn apart by American-made weapons, polished and prepped by foreign contractors. The livestream genocide has not stopped. The...

"Globalize the Intifada”—Or How to Offend Power by Naming Its Crimes

  ๐Ÿ“ฐ The New York Times and the Art of Grieving Selectively ✍️ By Malik Mukhtar ๐Ÿ“ ainnbeen.blogspot.com ๐Ÿ“… July 2, 2025 Bret Stephens is upset. Again. Apparently, he’s still recovering from Cafรฉ Moment. And Passover in Netanya. And that one horrific morning in 2004 when he saw carnage on Azza Street. And he has every right to grieve those losses. Every human does. But here’s the thing: Some corpses get columns. Others get erased. Stephens, perched on the prestigious opinion page of The New York Times , just spent a full-length sermon condemning Zohran Mamdani—not for what he said, but for what he refused to denounce: the phrase “ globalize the intifada.” According to Bret, refusing to ritually cleanse your political career with the holy water of pro-Israel respectability is now akin to blessing bus bombings. What “ globalize the intifada” really means, Mr. Stephens, is refusing to accept a world where genocide is livestreamed, and the world just shrugs. It means dari...

๐Ÿ•ฏ️ The Day Tel Aviv Trembled: Iran’s Missiles and the Crumbling Illusion of Invincibility

  By ainnbeen.blogspot.com For decades, Israel projected an image of invulnerability— a fortress powered by American billions , state-of-the-art missile defenses, and a myth of unmatched military precision. But in a chilling shift, that illusion is cracking. As Iranian missiles rained down on Tel Aviv, not through proxies but directly from Tehran, the world witnessed what was once unthinkable: the heart of Israel under direct attack, air-raid sirens wailing , embassies shuttered , and diplomats fleeing. This isn’t just a military development —it’s a political earthquake . And it exposes deep fractures in Israel’s defense doctrine, regional strategy, and perhaps most importantly —its belief that it could strike without consequence. ๐Ÿ”ฅ 1. Iranian Missiles Hit Tel Aviv: The Strike That Shattered Complacency In what appears to be retaliation for Israel’s continuous sabotage campaigns — nuclear facility strikes , assassinations of IRGC commanders — Iran unleashed a salvo...

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iran’s Missile Strikes on U.S. Bases | June 23, 2025 Operation Tidings of Victory

๐Ÿ“ What Happened On the evening of June 23 , around 8:00 p.m. local time (17:00 UTC) , Iran launched a coordinated missile attack on multiple U.S. military sites: Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar : ~10 missiles launched. Explosions were heard over Doha. Qatar’s air defense systems intercepted several. U.S. outposts in Iraq : Specific bases were hit; names have not been officially disclosed. Mentions of the U.S. Consulate in Erbil and sites in Kuwait : Reports are unconfirmed regarding direct hits in Kuwait. ๐Ÿ“‰ Damage & Casualties No confirmed U.S. fatalities or serious injuries reported. Damage appears limited to infrastructure: some runways, radar systems, tents, and non-critical equipment were affected. Qatar successfully intercepted multiple missiles. No civilian injuries have been reported in Doha. In Iraq and Kuwait , initial assessments indicate no significant troop harm . ๐Ÿ“Œ Background & Context The attack is seen as a retaliatory strike by Iran for...