Skip to main content

Hell Is Breaking Loose in Lebanon”: Israel Rejects Ceasefire Proposal as U.N. Chief Calls for Peace

 Key Points from the Interview:

1. Ongoing Conflict and Casualties: Israel's bombardment of Lebanon has displaced about 500,000 people. On Wednesday alone, 72 people were killed, bringing the death toll in recent days to over 620. Israel has rejected an international call for a 21-day ceasefire.

Mahdi Amelwho was a Marxist intellectual. And he wrote this a few months after the 1982 invasion of Beirut. And he writes:
"They said that the war in Lebanon would be swift and that in a few days those who have not knelt and who understand only the language of force would kneel. They declared that there would be no salaam, but shalom, and that Israel is the Rome of our modern times. To the kings of Israel, to the scum of our nation and our foul Arab regimes, to the petty fascists and to their imperialist masters, we say: It pleases us to spit in your faces. We will fight you even with our nails. Our fists are the compass of history. And the bullet of our freedom will pierce your hearts. To them, we say, brick by brick, we build a world on your graves. You are the dustbin of history, and Beirut is the city of the free. We have vowed that we will resist you.

2. Possible Ground Invasion: 
Israel is preparing for a potential ground invasion of Lebanon, having deployed two brigades to the Lebanese border.

3. Widespread Suffering: 
Journalist Lara Bitar, based in Beirut, reports on the extreme hardships faced by displaced people, especially the elderly, who have endured previous invasions. Despite the suffering, there is a strong attachment to the land.

4. Historical Context: 
Bitar highlights Israel’s repeated invasions and occupations of Lebanon, referencing invasions in 1978, 1982, and 2006. She emphasizes that the current violence is part of a long history of Israeli aggression in the region.

5. Ceasefire Skepticism: 
Bitar expresses deep skepticism about the potential for a ceasefire, citing past broken promises and the failure of the Biden administration to follow through on red lines in Gaza.

6. Hezbollah's Response: 
Hezbollah, so far, has tried to de-escalate the situation, targeting military infrastructure rather than civilians. Bitar suggests that an Israeli ground invasion would be deeply traumatizing for Israeli soldiers.

7. UN Resolutions: 
U.N. Resolutions 1701 and 1559, meant to address peace and security in Lebanon, are regularly violated by Israel. The Lebanese population does not place much faith in international resolutions or the U.N. Security Council.

8. Global Responsibility: 
Bitar argues that global citizens should act by boycotting and divesting from Israel. She believes international pressure is necessary to make Israel's actions too costly to continue.

9. International Manipulation: 
Bitar is critical of the U.S. and other Western nations, accusing them of manipulating public opinion and failing to take serious steps toward achieving a ceasefire. She questions the sincerity of U.S. diplomatic efforts.

10. Call for Global Action: 
In her closing remarks, Bitar calls for grassroots action, urging people worldwidesà to pressure their governments and institutions to isolate Israel economically and diplomatically to end the violence.

Source: 
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/9/26/lebanon_israel_hezbollah_ceasefire

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Crusaders Go Digital: Old Wars, New Costumes, Same Bloodlust

History, it seems, has developed a dark sense of humor. After centuries of reflection, scholarship, and solemn declarations of “never again,” we now find elected officials—armed not with swords but with AI filters —cosplaying as Crusaders . Progress , apparently, means upgrading from iron armor to algorithmic propaganda. Let’s begin where this story actually starts—not in Washington, not in Tel Aviv, but nearly a thousand years ago, when Europe launched what it called “holy wars.” ⚔️ The Original Crusades: A Brief Reminder The Crusades (1095–1291) were not a single war but a series of campaigns initiated after Pope Urban II’s call at Clermont in 1095. His message was simple and devastatingly effective: reclaim Jerusalem, and God will reward you. What followed was not a clean clash of armies, but waves of violence that engulfed entire regions—from France and Germany through Hungary, into Byzantium, Antioch, and Palestine. Historians caution that medieval records are fragmented, but acro...

The War That Wins on Paper—and Bleeds in Reality

  The War That Always Works—Until It Doesn’t There is a certain elegance to modern war. Not the destruction. Not the bodies. But the presentation . The language is always impeccable: “ Strategic degradation” “Precision targeting” “Limited objectives” It almost sounds like a policy workshop — not the opening act of something that may consume an entire region. And once again, the script is being rehearsed. Iran is “weakened.” Its systems are “degraded.” Its options are “limited.” And somewhere between these carefully chosen words, a very old idea quietly returns: Maybe this time, we finish it. Chapter One: The Seduction of Air Power Airstrikes are irresistible. They promise control without commitment. Dominance without vulnerability. Victory without presence. You can bomb a country… without ever having to meet it . No dialects to understand. No terrain to navigate. No জনগোষ্ঠী to confront. Just coordinates. And for a brief moment— it feels like war ...

Ceasefires, Fireworks, and the Fine Art of Calling Ashes “Peace”

  There is something almost poetic about declaring victory while the smoke is still rising. Not poetic in the romantic sense—more in the way a press release can be mistaken for reality if repeated often enough. So here we are. Another “ceasefire.” Another “agreement.” Another feather in the ever-expanding, never-examined peacemaking cap of Donald Trump . Israel–Iran. Israel–Hezbollah. Israel–Hamas. One could be forgiven for thinking peace has broken out everywhere—if peace meant pauses between airstrikes . The Theater of Victory On cue, Benjamin Netanyahu steps forward, flanked by ministers who speak the language of triumph as if it were immune to contradiction. “Iran weakened.” “Hezbollah contained.” “Total victory.” It all sounds remarkably similar to past declarations—just before the next round of fighting. Because here’s the inconvenient detail buried beneath the applause: none of the stated objectives were actually achieved. Iran still has its missiles. Hezboll...

Morality Compass? Or a Weapon of Convenience

There is something almost poetic about the sudden rediscovery of morality in war. Not morality itself. Not restraint. But the language of it. Because today, we are told—once again—that there are limits. That civilians matter. That infrastructure must not be touched. And yet, at the very same moment, Donald Trump openly threatens to “ obliterate” Iran’s infrastructure —including electric grids and water desalination plants , the very systems that keep millions alive. Water. Electricity. The basic architecture of survival . Not hidden in classified documents. Not whispered behind closed doors. But declared—casually, publicly, almost theatrically. So let’s ask again: Where exactly is this moral compass? Because if destroying water systems—knowing it will deprive civilians of drinking water—is not crossing a line, then perhaps the line was never there. Legal experts are not confused about this. Targeting such infrastructure is widely considered prohibited under internatio...

When the System Is Questioned by Its Own Guardians. A Warning Israel Can’t Dismiss.

  When the Warning Comes From Within There are moments in history when criticism from the outside can be dismissed—but when it comes from within, it becomes something far more dangerous: a mirror. That is what makes the recent letter by the The London Initiative so unsettling. Jewish philanthropists. Rabbis. Community leaders. Not critics of Israel—but voices shaped by it—now warning Isaac Herzog that something has gone terribly wrong. Their charge is stark: extremist settler violence is no longer fringe— it is becoming normalized. The Numbers That Refuse to Stay Quiet This is not rhetoric. It is data. Israeli military data (reported by Haaretz ) shows settler attacks rose by 25% in 2025 845 attacks in 2025 alone , injuring around 200 Palestinians Since October 2023: over 1,700 recorded settler attacks Early 2026: an average of 4 incidents per day And according to the United Nations and field reporting: Hundreds of Palestinians injured already in 2026 Entire ...